Suppr超能文献

合并症对糖尿病患者结直肠癌筛查成本效益研究的影响。

Impact of comorbidity on colorectal cancer screening cost-effectiveness study in diabetic populations.

机构信息

Archimedes Inc., 201 Mission St., 29th floor, San Francisco, CA 94105, USA.

出版信息

J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27(6):730-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1972-6. Epub 2012 Jan 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although comorbidity has been shown to affect the benefits and risks of colorectal cancer (CRC) screening, it has not been accounted for in prior cost-effectiveness analyses of CRC screening.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of diagnosis of diabetes mellitus, a highly prevalent comorbidity in U.S. adults aged 50 and older, on health and economic outcomes of CRC screening.

DESIGN

Cost-effectiveness analysis using an integrated modeling framework.

DATA SOURCES

Derived from basic and epidemiologic studies, clinical trials, cancer registries, and a colonoscopy database.

TARGET POPULATION

U.S. 50-year-old population.

TIME HORIZON

Lifetime.

PERSPECTIVE

Costs are based on Medicare reimbursement rates.

INTERVENTIONS

Colonoscopy screening at ten-year intervals, beginning at age 50, and discontinued after age 50, 60, 70, 80 or death.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Health outcomes and cost effectiveness.

RESULTS OF BASE-CASE ANALYSIS: Diabetes diagnosis significantly affects cost-effectiveness of CRC screening. For the same CRC screening strategy, a person without diabetes at age 50 gained on average 0.07-0.13 life years more than a person diagnosed with diabetes at age 50 or younger. For a population of 1,000 patients diagnosed with diabetes at baseline, increasing stop age from 70 years to 80 years increased quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained by 0.3, with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $206,671/QALY. The corresponding figures for 1,000 patients without diabetes are 2.3 QALYs and $46,957/QALY.

RESULTS OF SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS

Cost-effectiveness results are sensitive to cost of colonoscopy and adherence to colonoscopy screening.

LIMITATIONS

Results depend on accuracy of model assumptions.

CONCLUSION

Benefits of CRC screening differ substantially for patients with and without diabetes. Screening for CRC in patients diagnosed with diabetes at age 50 or younger is not cost-effective beyond age 70. Screening recommendations should be individualized based on the presence of comorbidities.

摘要

背景

尽管合并症已被证明会影响结直肠癌(CRC)筛查的获益和风险,但在之前的 CRC 筛查成本效益分析中并未考虑到这一点。

目的

评估糖尿病(美国 50 岁及以上成年人中高发的合并症)诊断对 CRC 筛查的健康和经济结果的影响。

设计

使用综合建模框架进行成本效益分析。

数据来源

来源于基础和流行病学研究、临床试验、癌症登记处和结肠镜数据库。

目标人群

美国 50 岁人群。

时间范围

终生。

视角

成本基于医疗保险报销率。

干预措施

50 岁开始每十年进行一次结肠镜筛查,在 50、60、70、80 岁或死亡后停止筛查。

结果测量

健康结果和成本效益。

基础分析结果

糖尿病诊断显著影响 CRC 筛查的成本效益。对于相同的 CRC 筛查策略,50 岁时未患有糖尿病的人比 50 岁及以下诊断患有糖尿病的人平均多获得 0.07-0.13 个生命年。对于基线时诊断出患有糖尿病的 1000 名患者,将停止年龄从 70 岁增加到 80 岁,会使获得的质量调整生命年(QALY)增加 0.3,增量成本效益比为 206671 美元/QALY。对于没有糖尿病的 1000 名患者,相应的数字为 2.3 QALY 和 46957 美元/QALY。

敏感性分析结果

成本效益结果对结肠镜检查的成本和结肠镜检查的依从性敏感。

局限性

结果取决于模型假设的准确性。

结论

CRC 筛查对患有和不患有糖尿病的患者的获益有很大差异。对于在 50 岁或更年轻被诊断患有糖尿病的患者,筛查 CRC 到 70 岁以后就没有成本效益了。应根据合并症的存在来个体化筛查建议。

相似文献

1
Impact of comorbidity on colorectal cancer screening cost-effectiveness study in diabetic populations.
J Gen Intern Med. 2012 Jun;27(6):730-8. doi: 10.1007/s11606-011-1972-6. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
2
Health benefits and cost-effectiveness of a hybrid screening strategy for colorectal cancer.
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Sep;11(9):1158-66. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.03.013. Epub 2013 Mar 28.
3
Contrasting Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of Colorectal Cancer Screening Under Commercial Insurance vs. Medicare.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2018 Dec;113(12):1836-1847. doi: 10.1038/s41395-018-0106-8. Epub 2018 Jun 15.
5
Cost-effectiveness and budget impact analyses of colorectal cancer screenings in a low- and middle-income country: example from Thailand.
J Med Econ. 2019 Dec;22(12):1351-1361. doi: 10.1080/13696998.2019.1674065. Epub 2019 Oct 12.
7
High-Intensity Versus Low-Intensity Surveillance for Patients With Colorectal Adenomas: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Ann Intern Med. 2019 Nov 5;171(9):612-622. doi: 10.7326/M18-3633. Epub 2019 Sep 24.
8
Comparative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of screening colonoscopy vs. sigmoidoscopy and alternative strategies.
Am J Gastroenterol. 2013 Jan;108(1):120-32. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2012.380. Epub 2012 Dec 18.
10
Cost Effectiveness of Screening Individuals With Cystic Fibrosis for Colorectal Cancer.
Gastroenterology. 2018 Feb;154(3):556-567.e18. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2017.10.036. Epub 2017 Nov 2.

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

1
Individualized guidelines: the potential for increasing quality and reducing costs.
Ann Intern Med. 2011 May 3;154(9):627-34. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-154-9-201105030-00008.
2
Cancer statistics, 2010.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2010 Sep-Oct;60(5):277-300. doi: 10.3322/caac.20073. Epub 2010 Jul 7.
3
Once-only flexible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Lancet. 2010 May 8;375(9726):1624-33. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60551-X. Epub 2010 Apr 27.
4
Age at initiation and frequency of screening to detect type 2 diabetes: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Lancet. 2010 Apr 17;375(9723):1365-74. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)62162-0. Epub 2010 Mar 29.
5
Effect of rising chemotherapy costs on the cost savings of colorectal cancer screening.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Oct 21;101(20):1412-22. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djp319. Epub 2009 Sep 24.
7
Adverse events after outpatient colonoscopy in the Medicare population.
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Jun 16;150(12):849-57, W152. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-12-200906160-00008.
8
Individualizing colonoscopy screening by sex and race.
Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Jul;70(1):96-108, 108.e1-24. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.08.040. Epub 2009 May 24.
9
Impact of age and comorbidity on colorectal cancer screening among older veterans.
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Apr 7;150(7):465-73. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-150-7-200904070-00006.
10
American College of Gastroenterology guidelines for colorectal cancer screening 2009 [corrected].
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar;104(3):739-50. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.104. Epub 2009 Feb 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验