• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两辆车正面至背面碰撞,司机严重受伤。

Front-to-rear crashes involving two vehicles with severe driver injury.

机构信息

ProBiomechanics LLC, Bloomfield Hills, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

Traffic Inj Prev. 2012;13(1):55-60. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2011.625735.

DOI:10.1080/15389588.2011.625735
PMID:22239144
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study investigates the risk for severe-to-fatal injury (Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale [MAIS] 4+F) to drivers in two-vehicle crashes involving front impacts into the rear of another vehicle.

METHODS

1995-2009 National Automotive Sampling System-Crashworthiness Data System (NASS-CDS) was analyzed for driver injuries in front-to-rear crashes without rear occupants in either vehicle. The study involved 13+-year-old front outboard occupants in model year (MY) 1995+ light vehicles. Injury severity was subdivided into MAIS 0+6 and MAIS 4+F to assess the risk of severe-to-fatal injury (MAIS 4+F/MAIS 0+6). Injury risks were determined using weighted data for the drivers by impact type. Standard errors were calculated in SAS to determine ±95 percent confidence intervals. An in-depth analysis was made of individual cases with severely injured drivers in the front and rear impacts.

RESULTS

There were 215,163 drivers in the 15 years of NASS-CDS with known injuries in front-to-rear two-vehicle collisions; 624 were severely injured (MAIS 4+F) in the rear impacts and 124 in the front impacts. The risk for severe-to-fatal driver injury was 0.290 ± 0.241 percent in rear impacts and 0.058 ± 0.057 percent in front impacts. The difference was not statistically significant (P > .05). There were 13 unweighted cases with MAIS 4+F driver injury in rear impacts. Most (77%) involved intrusion in the vicinity of the driver's seating area with the seat supported upright or deformed forward. There were 5 unweighted cases with severely injured drivers in frontal impacts. Three (60%) involved intrusion due to offset frontal loading. There was only one crash where both drivers were severely injured.

CONCLUSIONS

In front-to-rear crashes with two vehicles, typically one driver was severely injured, not both. The risk of severe injury was not significantly different for drivers in the front or rear impacts. The risk was higher in rear impacts due to intrusion into the driver's seating area that supported or pushed the driver's seat forward. The risk for drivers in frontal crashes was also often related to intrusion due to offset loading and occupant compartment deformation.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查两车碰撞中,正面撞击另一辆车后部导致驾驶员重伤或死亡(最大简略损伤等级 [MAIS] 4+F)的风险。

方法

分析了 1995 年至 2009 年国家汽车抽样系统碰撞数据系统(NASS-CDS)中没有后排乘客的两车正面追尾碰撞中驾驶员的受伤情况。研究涉及 1995 年及以上款型轻型车辆中,前排外侧 13 岁以上的乘客。损伤严重程度分为 MAIS 0+6 和 MAIS 4+F,以评估重伤或死亡(MAIS 4+F/MAIS 0+6)的风险。通过冲击类型对驾驶员使用加权数据确定损伤风险。在 SAS 中计算标准误差以确定±95%置信区间。对前后冲击中严重受伤驾驶员的个别病例进行了深入分析。

结果

NASS-CDS 15 年期间,有 215163 名驾驶员在两车正面追尾碰撞中受伤;624 名驾驶员在后部碰撞中重伤(MAIS 4+F),124 名驾驶员在正面碰撞中重伤。后部碰撞中驾驶员重伤或死亡的风险为 0.290±0.241%,正面碰撞中为 0.058±0.057%。差异无统计学意义(P>.05)。后部碰撞中有 13 例未加权 MAIS 4+F 驾驶员损伤病例。大多数(77%)涉及驾驶员座椅区域附近的侵入,座椅支撑直立或向前变形。正面碰撞中有 5 例驾驶员严重受伤病例。其中 3 例(60%)涉及因正面偏置加载引起的侵入。只有一起事故中两名驾驶员均受重伤。

结论

在两车正面追尾碰撞中,通常只有一名驾驶员重伤,而不是两名。前后冲击中驾驶员重伤的风险没有显著差异。由于侵入驾驶员座椅区域,支撑或推动驾驶员座椅向前,后部冲击中的风险更高。正面碰撞中驾驶员的风险也常常与因偏移加载和乘客舱变形引起的侵入有关。

相似文献

1
Front-to-rear crashes involving two vehicles with severe driver injury.两辆车正面至背面碰撞,司机严重受伤。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2012;13(1):55-60. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2011.625735.
2
Rollover injury in vehicles with high-strength-to-weight ratio (SWR) roofs, curtain and side airbags, and other safety improvements.在配备高强度重量比(SWR)车顶、窗帘式和侧面安全气囊以及其他安全改进措施的车辆中的翻滚损伤。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018;19(7):734-740. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2018.1482489. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
3
Driver and front passenger injury in frontal crashes: Update on the effect of unbelted rear occupants.正面碰撞中驾驶员和前排乘客的损伤:未系安全带的后排乘客的影响更新。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2018 Jan 2;19(1):28-34. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2017.1344355. Epub 2017 Jun 28.
4
Factors contributing to serious and fatal injuries in belted rear seat occupants in frontal crashes.导致正面碰撞中安全带后排座椅乘客重伤和死亡的因素。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2019;20(sup1):S84-S91. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2019.1601182.
5
Light-vehicle occupancy and severe injury by vehicle and crash type.轻型车辆乘坐人数与车辆和碰撞类型导致的重伤。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(5):457-61. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.835044.
6
IIHS side crash test ratings and occupant death risk in real-world crashes.IIHS 侧面碰撞测试评级与现实碰撞中的乘员死亡风险。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2011 Oct;12(5):500-7. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2011.585671.
7
Effectiveness of the revision to FMVSS 301: FARS and NASS-CDS analysis of fatalities and severe injuries in rear impacts.FMVSS 301 修订版的有效性:FARS 和 NASS-CDS 对后碰撞中死亡和重伤的分析。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Apr;89:1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.12.016. Epub 2016 Jan 13.
8
Effect of cargo loading on occupant injury and seat deformation in motor-vehicle crashes.货物装载对汽车碰撞中乘员伤害和座椅变形的影响。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(8):835-43. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.894996.
9
A matched-cohort analysis of belted front and rear seat occupants in newer and older model vehicles shows that gains in front occupant safety have outpaced gains for rear seat occupants.对新款和老款车辆中系安全带的前后排座椅乘客进行的匹配队列分析表明,前排乘客的安全收益超过了后排座椅乘客的安全收益。
Accid Anal Prev. 2010 Nov;42(6):1974-7. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2010.06.002. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
10
Severe-to-fatal injury risks in crashes with two front-seat occupants by seat belt use.安全带使用与两名前排乘客座位的碰撞中严重至致命伤害风险。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2010 Jun;11(3):294-9. doi: 10.1080/15389581003788898.