• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于损伤的重建方法在 NHTSA 侧面碰撞测试中的准确性。

Accuracy of a damage-based reconstruction method in NHTSA side crash tests.

机构信息

Virginia Tech-Wake Forest University, Center for Injury Biomechanics, Blacksburg, Virginia 24061, USA.

出版信息

Traffic Inj Prev. 2012;13(1):72-80. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2011.636592.

DOI:10.1080/15389588.2011.636592
PMID:22239147
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Delta-V (ΔV), the magnitude of the velocity change experienced by a vehicle during a crash, is widely used as a predictor of injury risk. The National Automotive Sampling System/Crashworthiness Data System (NASS-CDS) uses the WinSMASH computer code to reconstruct ΔV based on postcrash vehicle deformation. WinSMASH, a direct descendant of CRASH3, first uses vehicle damage to estimate absorbed energy and then applies momentum conservation to estimate ΔV. This study aims to determine the accuracy of WinSMASH ΔV reconstructions for NHTSA side crash tests.

METHODS

This study is based upon 168 dynamic side impact tests conducted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA). For each crash test the actual ΔV for the struck vehicle was first determined from test instrumentation. WinSMASH was then used to reconstruct the struck vehicle ΔV for each test. WinSMASH-reconstructed ΔVs were compared to measured ΔVs for each test to assess reconstruction accuracy.

RESULTS

WinSMASH predicts ΔV at maximum crush, before restitution occurs. WinSMASH predictions of struck vehicle ΔV at maximum crush were 20 percent high on average when using vehicle specific stiffnesses, with a great deal of inter-case variability in the error. When compared to the total struck vehicle ΔV at separation (including restitution), WinSMASH overpredicted ΔV by 11 percent. WinSMASH overpredicted the amount of energy absorbed in collisions by 40 percent, which is consistent with overprediction of ΔV. When forced to reconstruct tests using the amount of absorbed energy calculated from the test data, error in WinSMASH ΔV effectively disappeared.

DISCUSSION

When reconstructing NHTSA side crash tests, WinSMASH overpredicts maximum crush ΔV by about 20 percent on average. The primary factors determining the amount of ΔV overprediction appear to be overprediction of absorbed energy and the assumption of zero restitution. WinSMASH vehicle side stiffness parameters are calculated based on artificially high energies; this may explain the overprediction of absorbed energy. WinSMASH's assumption of zero restitution partially masks the effect of energy overprediction. When given accurate reconstruction inputs and energy estimates, WinSMASH is capable of accurately reconstructing maximum crush ΔV in NHTSA side crash tests but cannot compensate for restitution.

摘要

目的

Delta-V(ΔV)是车辆在碰撞过程中经历的速度变化量,被广泛用作伤害风险的预测指标。国家汽车抽样系统/耐撞性数据系统(NASS-CDS)使用 WinSMASH 计算机代码根据碰撞后车辆变形来重建ΔV。WinSMASH 是 CRASH3 的直接后代,首先使用车辆损坏来估计吸收的能量,然后应用动量守恒来估计ΔV。本研究旨在确定 WinSMASHΔV 重建用于 NHTSA 侧面碰撞测试的准确性。

方法

本研究基于美国国家公路交通安全管理局(NHTSA)进行的 168 次动态侧面冲击测试。对于每一次碰撞测试,首先从测试仪器中确定了被撞车辆的实际ΔV。然后,为每个测试使用 WinSMASH 重建被撞车辆的ΔV。将 WinSMASH 重建的ΔVs 与每个测试的实测ΔVs 进行比较,以评估重建准确性。

结果

WinSMASH 在发生恢复之前预测最大压缩时的ΔV。当使用车辆特定刚度时,WinSMASH 对被撞车辆最大压缩时的ΔV 预测平均高出 20%,并且在误差方面存在很大的个案间可变性。当与分离时(包括恢复)的总被撞车辆ΔV 相比,WinSMASH 高估了 11%的ΔV。WinSMASH 高估了碰撞中吸收的能量,高估了 40%,这与高估ΔV 一致。当被迫使用从测试数据中计算得出的吸收能量来重建测试时,WinSMASHΔV 的误差实际上消失了。

讨论

在重建 NHTSA 侧面碰撞测试时,WinSMASH 平均高估了最大压缩时的ΔV 约 20%。确定ΔV 高估量的主要因素似乎是高估了吸收的能量和零恢复的假设。WinSMASH 车辆侧面刚度参数是根据人为较高的能量计算得出的,这可能解释了高估吸收的能量。WinSMASH 对零恢复的假设部分掩盖了能量高估的影响。当给出准确的重建输入和能量估计时,WinSMASH 能够准确重建 NHTSA 侧面碰撞测试中的最大压缩ΔV,但无法补偿恢复。

相似文献

1
Accuracy of a damage-based reconstruction method in NHTSA side crash tests.基于损伤的重建方法在 NHTSA 侧面碰撞测试中的准确性。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2012;13(1):72-80. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2011.636592.
2
Evaluation of NASS-CDS side crash delta-V estimates using event data recorders.利用事故数据记录器评估 NASS-CDS 侧面碰撞 delta-V 估计值。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(8):827-34. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2014.881995.
3
Analysis of delta velocity and PDOF by means of collision partner and structural involvement in real-life crash pulses with modern passenger cars.基于现代乘用车实际碰撞脉冲中碰撞对象和结构参与情况,分析相对速度增量和 PDOF。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2014;15(1):56-65. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2013.793796.
4
Evaluation of the Accuracy of NASS/CDS Delta-V Estimates from the Enhanced WinSmash Algorithm.评估增强型WinSmash算法中NASS/CDS速度增量估计的准确性。
Ann Adv Automot Med. 2010;54:241-52.
5
NASS/CDS delta-V estimates: the influence of enhancements to the WinSmash crash reconstruction code.美国国家航空航天安全委员会/民用航空局速度变化估计:对WinSmash碰撞重建代码增强的影响
Ann Adv Automot Med. 2009 Oct;53:91-102.
6
The accuracy of WinSmash delta-V estimates: the influence of vehicle type, stiffness, and impact mode.WinSmash速度增量估计的准确性:车辆类型、刚度和碰撞模式的影响。
Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2006;50:73-89.
7
Preventing passenger vehicle occupant injuries by vehicle design--a historical perspective from IIHS.通过车辆设计预防乘用车驾乘人员受伤——美国公路安全保险协会的历史视角
Traffic Inj Prev. 2009 Apr;10(2):113-26. doi: 10.1080/15389580802486225.
8
Factors affecting pelvic and thoracic forces in near-side impact crashes: a study of US-NCAP, NASS, and CIREN data.近侧碰撞事故中影响骨盆和胸部受力的因素:基于美国国家新车评估计划、国家汽车抽样系统及汽车事故重建与安全实验中心数据的研究
Accid Anal Prev. 2005 Mar;37(2):287-93. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2004.09.005.
9
IIHS side crash test ratings and occupant death risk in real-world crashes.IIHS 侧面碰撞测试评级与现实碰撞中的乘员死亡风险。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2011 Oct;12(5):500-7. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2011.585671.
10
Secondary collisions revisited: real-world crash data and relationship to crash test criteria.二次碰撞再探讨:实际碰撞数据与碰撞测试标准的关系。
Traffic Inj Prev. 2013;14(1):46-55. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2012.686076.