Department of Endodontics, University of Washington School of Dentistry, Seattle, Washington, USA.
J Endod. 2012 Feb;38(2):226-31. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2011.10.014. Epub 2011 Dec 5.
The shaping ability of root canal instruments is determined by a complex interrelationship of parameters such as cross-sectional design and the ability to remove debris and the smear layer. The self-adjusting file (SAF) consists of a hollow, flexible instrument in the form of a compressible, thin-walled, pointed cylinder. The aim of this study was to compare the SAF with the ProTaper rotary file system, evaluating debris and smear layer removal and the presence of bacteria by using microbiological and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) evaluation.
Fifty maxillary premolars were inoculated with Enterococcus faecalis for 30 days and then randomly distributed into 2 groups. Group 1 was prepared with ProTaper rotary instruments and irrigated with 30-gauge side-vented needles. Group 2 was prepared by using the SAF system with continuous irrigation. Bacteriologic samples were taken before and after preparation. All samples were then longitudinally split and analyzed under scanning electron microscopy. The scoring was carried out by 3 blinded evaluators.
In group 1, 40% of samples had negative cultures with postinstrumentation samples taken with paper points (S2a) and 45% with postinstrumentation dentin samples (S2b). In group 2, 20% of samples had negative cultures with S2a and 15% with S2b. Intragroup analyses evaluating the reduction in the number of colony-forming units (CFUs) from S1 to S2a and S2b demonstrated both preparation techniques were highly effective (P < .01). Further reduction of CFUs was observed when comparing S2a and S2b in group 1 (P < .05), whereas no difference was observed in group 2. Intergroup analysis demonstrated a statistically significant difference of CFUs at S2a and S2b (P < .05). SEM scores were consistent with the microbiology findings.
The SAF system does not allow control of the apical enlargement, thus limiting the ability of the irrigants to achieve effective and predictable disinfection.
根管器械的成型能力取决于多个参数之间的复杂相互关系,例如横截面设计以及去除碎屑和玷污层的能力。自调整锉(SAF)由空心、灵活的器械组成,呈可压缩的薄壁、尖圆柱形状。本研究的目的是通过微生物学和扫描电子显微镜(SEM)评估来比较 SAF 与 ProTaper 旋转锉系统,评估碎屑和玷污层的去除以及细菌的存在情况。
50 颗上颌前磨牙接种粪肠球菌 30 天,然后随机分为 2 组。第 1 组用 ProTaper 旋转器械预备,并使用 30 号侧孔针头冲洗。第 2 组使用 SAF 系统连续冲洗预备。预备前后采集细菌学样本。所有样本均纵向劈开,在扫描电子显微镜下分析。由 3 名盲法评估员进行评分。
第 1 组中,40%的样本在使用纸尖(S2a)采集的器械预备后样本和 45%的牙本质样本(S2b)中培养结果为阴性。第 2 组中,20%的样本在 S2a 中培养结果为阴性,15%的样本在 S2b 中培养结果为阴性。评估 S1 到 S2a 和 S2b 之间菌落形成单位(CFU)数量减少的组内分析表明,两种预备技术均非常有效(P <.01)。在第 1 组中,当比较 S2a 和 S2b 时,观察到 CFU 进一步减少(P <.05),而在第 2 组中未观察到差异。组间分析表明,S2a 和 S2b 的 CFU 存在统计学差异(P <.05)。SEM 评分与微生物学发现一致。
SAF 系统无法控制根尖扩大,从而限制了冲洗剂实现有效和可预测消毒的能力。