Radiological Center, University of Fukui Hospital, Fukui, Japan.
MAGMA. 2012 Apr;25(2):103-11. doi: 10.1007/s10334-011-0301-8. Epub 2012 Jan 13.
To propose a new arterial spin labeling (ASL) perfusion-imaging method (alternate slab width inversion recovery ASL: AIRASL) that takes advantage of the qualities of 3.0 T.
AIRASL utilizes alternate slab width IR pulses for labeling blood to obtain a higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Numerical simulations were used to evaluate perfusion signals. In vivo studies were performed to show the feasibility of AIRASL on five healthy subjects. We performed a statistical analysis of the differences in perfusion SNR measurements between flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) and AIRASL.
In signal simulation, the signal obtained by AIRASL at 3.0 and 1.5 T was 1.14 and 0.85%, respectively, whereas the signal obtained by FAIR at 3.0 and 1.5 T was 0.57 and 0.47%, respectively. In an in vivo study, the SNR of FAIR (3.0 T) and FAIR (1.5 T) were 1.73 ± 0.49 and 1.02 ± 0.20, respectively, whereas the SNRs of AIRASL (3.0 T) and AIRASL (1.5 T) were 3.93 ± 1.65 and 1.34 ± 0.31, respectively. SNR in AIRASL at 3.0 T was significantly greater than that in FAIR at 3.0 T.
The most significant potential advantage of AIRASL is its high SNR, which takes advantage of the qualities of 3.0 T. This sequence can be easily applied in the clinical setting and will enable ASL to become more relevant for clinical application.
提出一种新的动脉自旋标记(ASL)灌注成像方法(交替层面宽度反转恢复 ASL:AIRASL),充分利用 3.0T 的优点。
AIRASL 利用交替层面宽度 IR 脉冲对血液进行标记,以获得更高的信噪比(SNR)。采用数值模拟方法对灌注信号进行评估。在 5 名健康志愿者中进行了体内研究,以显示 AIRASL 的可行性。我们对流量敏感反转恢复(FAIR)和 AIRASL 测量的灌注 SNR 差异进行了统计学分析。
在信号模拟中,AIRASL 在 3.0 和 1.5T 时获得的信号分别为 1.14%和 0.85%,而 FAIR 在 3.0 和 1.5T 时获得的信号分别为 0.57%和 0.47%。在体内研究中,FAIR(3.0T)和 FAIR(1.5T)的 SNR 分别为 1.73±0.49 和 1.02±0.20,而 AIRASL(3.0T)和 AIRASL(1.5T)的 SNR 分别为 3.93±1.65 和 1.34±0.31。AIRASL 在 3.0T 时的 SNR 明显大于 FAIR 在 3.0T 时的 SNR。
AIRASL 的最大优势是其具有较高的 SNR,充分利用了 3.0T 的优势。该序列可轻松应用于临床环境,使 ASL 更能应用于临床。