Franklin Suzanne L, Bones Isabell K, Harteveld Anita A, Hirschler Lydiane, van Stralen Marijn, Qin Qin, de Boer Anneloes, Hoogduin Johannes M, Bos Clemens, van Osch Matthias J P, Schmid Sophie
C.J. Gorter Center for High Field MRI, Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Center for Image Sciences, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Magn Reson Med. 2021 May;85(5):2580-2594. doi: 10.1002/mrm.28603. Epub 2020 Nov 30.
Flow-based arterial spin labeling (ASL) techniques provide a transit-time insensitive alternative to the more conventional spatially selective ASL techniques. However, it is not clear which flow-based ASL technique performs best and also, how these techniques perform outside the brain (taking into account eg, flow-dynamics, field-inhomogeneity, and organ motion). In the current study we aimed to compare 4 flow-based ASL techniques (ie, velocity selective ASL, acceleration selective ASL, multiple velocity selective saturation ASL, and velocity selective inversion prepared ASL [VSI-ASL]) to the current spatially selective reference techniques in brain (ie, pseudo-continuous ASL [pCASL]) and kidney (ie, pCASL and flow alternating inversion recovery [FAIR]).
Brain (n = 5) and kidney (n = 6) scans were performed in healthy subjects at 3T. Perfusion-weighted signal (PWS) maps were generated and ASL techniques were compared based on temporal SNR (tSNR), sensitivity to perfusion changes using a visual stimulus (brain) and robustness to respiratory motion by comparing scans acquired in paced-breathing and free-breathing (kidney).
In brain, all flow-based ASL techniques showed similar tSNR as pCASL, but only VSI-ASL showed similar sensitivity to perfusion changes. In kidney, all flow-based ASL techniques had comparable tSNR, although all lower than FAIR. In addition, VSI-ASL showed a sensitivity to B -inhomogeneity. All ASL techniques were relatively robust to respiratory motion.
In both brain and kidney, flow-based ASL techniques provide a planning-free and transit-time insensitive alternative to spatially selective ASL techniques. VSI-ASL shows the most potential overall, showing similar performance as the golden standard pCASL in brain. However, in kidney, a reduction of B -sensitivity of VSI-ASL is necessary to match the performance of FAIR.
基于血流的动脉自旋标记(ASL)技术为更传统的空间选择性ASL技术提供了一种对通过时间不敏感的替代方法。然而,尚不清楚哪种基于血流的ASL技术表现最佳,以及这些技术在脑外的表现如何(例如,考虑血流动力学、场不均匀性和器官运动)。在本研究中,我们旨在将4种基于血流的ASL技术(即速度选择性ASL、加速度选择性ASL、多速度选择性饱和ASL和速度选择性反转准备ASL [VSI-ASL])与当前脑内的空间选择性参考技术(即伪连续ASL [pCASL])和肾内的空间选择性参考技术(即pCASL和血流交替反转恢复 [FAIR])进行比较。
在3T对健康受试者进行脑(n = 5)和肾(n = 6)扫描。生成灌注加权信号(PWS)图,并基于时间信噪比(tSNR)、使用视觉刺激时对灌注变化的敏感性(脑)以及通过比较在有节奏呼吸和自由呼吸时采集的扫描对呼吸运动的稳健性(肾)对ASL技术进行比较。
在脑内,所有基于血流的ASL技术的tSNR与pCASL相似,但只有VSI-ASL对灌注变化的敏感性相似。在肾内,所有基于血流的ASL技术的tSNR相当,尽管均低于FAIR。此外,VSI-ASL对B不均匀性敏感。所有ASL技术对呼吸运动相对稳健。
在脑和肾中,基于血流的ASL技术为空间选择性ASL技术提供了一种无需规划且对通过时间不敏感的替代方法。总体而言,VSI-ASL显示出最大潜力,在脑内表现与金标准pCASL相似。然而,在肾内,需要降低VSI-ASL 的B敏感性以匹配FAIR的性能。