Suppr超能文献

对 Chimowitz 等人在《新英格兰医学杂志》上发表的“颅内动脉狭窄的血管内支架置入术与强化药物治疗的比较”一文的评论。

Critique of "Stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for intracranial arterial stenosis" by Chimowitz et al in the new England Journal of Medicine.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Room 113, University of Louisville, 500 S Preston Street, Louisville, KY 40202, USA.

出版信息

Stroke. 2012 Feb;43(2):616-20. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.641563. Epub 2012 Jan 12.

Abstract

Symptomatic intracranial stenoses are an important cause of stroke and have a high risk of recurrent stroke with medical therapy. The Stenting and Aggressive Medical Management for Preventing Recurrent Stroke in Intracranial Arterial Stenosis (SAMMPRIS) trial unexpectedly showed a higher-than-expected rate of complications with intracranial stenting and a lower-than-expected recurrence rate with medical therapy. In this commentary, the authors review possible explanations for these findings and suggest future strategies for study.

摘要

症状性颅内狭窄是中风的一个重要原因,且采用药物治疗时中风复发的风险很高。血管内支架置入术和强化药物治疗预防颅内动脉狭窄患者卒中复发的研究(SAMMPRIS)试验出人意料地显示颅内支架置入术的并发症发生率高于预期,而药物治疗的复发率却低于预期。在这篇评论中,作者回顾了这些发现的可能解释,并提出了未来的研究策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验