Department of Radiology, Rui Jin Hospital, Medical School, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200025, PR China.
Korean J Radiol. 2012 Jan-Feb;13(1):20-6. doi: 10.3348/kjr.2012.13.1.20. Epub 2011 Dec 23.
To assess the performance of a high-definition CT (HDCT) for imaging small caliber coronary stents (≤ 3 mm) by comparing different scan modes of a conventional 64-row standard-definition CT (SDCT).
A cardiac phantom with twelve stents (2.5 mm and 3.0 mm in diameter) was scanned by HDCT and SDCT. The scan modes were retrospective electrocardiography (ECG)-gated helical and prospective ECG-triggered axial with tube voltages of 120 kVp and 100 kVp, respectively. The inner stent diameters (ISD) and the in-stent attenuation value (AV(in-stent)) and the in-vessel extra-stent attenuation value (AV(in-vessel)) were measured by two observers. The artificial lumen narrowing (ALN = [ISD - ISD(measured)]/ISD) and artificial attenuation increase between in-stent and in-vessel (AAI = AV(in-stent) - AV(in-vessel)) were calculated. All data was analyzed by intraclass correlation and ANOVA-test.
The correlation coefficient of ISD, AV(in-vessel) and AV(in-stent) between the two observers was good. The ALNs of HDCT were statistically lower than that of SDCT (30 ± 5.7% versus 35 ± 5.4%, p < 0.05). HDCT had statistically lower AAI values than SDCT (15.7 ± 81.4 HU versus 71.4 ± 90.5 HU, p < 0.05). The prospective axial dataset demonstrated smaller ALN than the retrospective helical dataset on both HDCT and SDCT (p < 0.05). Additionally, there were no differences in ALN between the 120 kVp and 100 kVp tube voltages on HDCT (p = 0.05).
High-definition CT helps improve measurement accuracy for imaging coronary stents compared to SDCT. HDCT with 100 kVp and the prospective ECG-triggered axial technique, with a lower radiation dose than 120 kVp application, may be advantageous in evaluating coronary stents with smaller calibers (≤ 3 mm).
通过比较常规 64 排标准定义 CT(SDCT)的不同扫描模式,评估高分辨率 CT(HDCT)对小口径冠状动脉支架(≤3mm)成像的性能。
使用心脏模型对 12 个支架(直径 2.5mm 和 3.0mm)进行 HDCT 和 SDCT 扫描。扫描模式分别为回顾性心电门控螺旋和前瞻性心电触发轴向,管电压分别为 120kVp 和 100kVp。由两位观察者测量内支架直径(ISD)、支架内衰减值(AV(支架内))和血管内支架外衰减值(AV(血管内))。计算支架内人工管腔狭窄(ALN = [ISD - ISD(测量值)]/ISD)和支架内与血管内之间的人工衰减增加(AAI = AV(支架内)-AV(血管内))。所有数据均采用组内相关系数和方差分析进行分析。
两位观察者之间 ISD、AV(血管内)和 AV(支架内)的相关性系数良好。HDCT 的 ALN 明显低于 SDCT(30 ± 5.7% 对 35 ± 5.4%,p < 0.05)。HDCT 的 AAI 值明显低于 SDCT(15.7 ± 81.4HU 对 71.4 ± 90.5HU,p < 0.05)。在 HDCT 和 SDCT 上,前瞻性轴向数据集的 ALN 明显小于回顾性螺旋数据集(p < 0.05)。此外,在 HDCT 上,120kVp 和 100kVp 管电压之间的 ALN 无差异(p = 0.05)。
与 SDCT 相比,HDCT 有助于提高冠状动脉支架成像的测量准确性。与 120kVp 应用相比,100kVp 管电压和前瞻性心电触发轴向技术的 HDCT 辐射剂量较低,可能有利于评估较小口径(≤3mm)的冠状动脉支架。