• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

性接触网络的动态变化:对疾病传播和控制的影响。

The dynamics of sexual contact networks: effects on disease spread and control.

作者信息

Robinson Katy, Cohen Ted, Colijn Caroline

机构信息

Bristol Centre for Complexity Sciences, Department of Engineering Mathematics, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Theor Popul Biol. 2012 Mar;81(2):89-96. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2011.12.009. Epub 2012 Jan 8.

DOI:10.1016/j.tpb.2011.12.009
PMID:22248701
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3328800/
Abstract

Sexually transmitted pathogens persist in populations despite the availability of biomedical interventions and knowledge of behavioural changes that would reduce individual-level risk. While behavioural risk factors are shared between many sexually transmitted infections, the prevalence of these diseases across different risk groups varies. Understanding this heterogeneity and identifying better control strategies depends on an improved understanding of the complex social contact networks over which pathogens spread. To date, most efforts to study the impact of sexual network structure on disease dynamics have focused on static networks. However, the interaction between the dynamics of partnership formation and dissolution and the dynamics of transmission plays a role, both in restricting the effective network accessible to the pathogen, and in modulating the transmission dynamics. We present a simple method to simulate dynamical networks of sexual partnerships. We inform the model using survey data on sexual attitudes and lifestyles, and investigate how the duration of infectiousness changes the effective contact network over which disease may spread. We then simulate several control strategies: screening, vaccination and behavioural interventions. Previous theory and research has advanced the importance of core groups for spread and control of STD. Our work is consistent with the importance of core groups, but extends this idea to consider how the duration of infectiousness associated with a particular pathogen interacts with host behaviours to define these high risk subpopulations. Characteristics of the parts of the network accessible to the pathogen, which represent the network structure of sexual contacts from the "point of view" of the pathogen, are substantially different from those of the network as a whole. The pathogen itself plays an important role in determining this effective network structure; specifically, we find that if the pathogen's duration of infectiousness is short, infection is more concentrated in high-activity, high-concurrency individuals even when all other factors are held constant. Widespread screening programmes would be enhanced by follow-up interventions targeting higher-risk individuals, because screening shortens the expected duration of infectiousness and causes a greater relative decrease in prevalence among lower-activity than in higher-activity individuals. Even for pathogens with longer durations of infectiousness, our findings suggest that targeting vaccination and behavioural interventions towards high-activity individuals provides comparable benefits to population-wide interventions.

摘要

尽管有生物医学干预措施,且人们也了解可降低个体层面风险的行为变化,但性传播病原体仍在人群中持续存在。虽然许多性传播感染存在共同的行为风险因素,但这些疾病在不同风险群体中的流行程度各不相同。了解这种异质性并确定更好的控制策略,取决于对病原体传播所涉及的复杂社会接触网络有更深入的理解。迄今为止,大多数研究性网络结构对疾病动态影响的工作都集中在静态网络上。然而,性伴侣形成和解散的动态过程与传播动态之间的相互作用,在限制病原体可接触的有效网络以及调节传播动态方面都发挥着作用。我们提出了一种模拟性伴侣动态网络的简单方法。我们利用关于性态度和生活方式的调查数据为模型提供信息,并研究传染性持续时间如何改变疾病可能传播的有效接触网络。然后,我们模拟了几种控制策略:筛查、疫苗接种和行为干预。先前的理论和研究已经强调了核心群体在性传播疾病传播和控制中的重要性。我们的工作与核心群体的重要性是一致的,但扩展了这一观点,以考虑与特定病原体相关的传染性持续时间如何与宿主行为相互作用来定义这些高风险亚群体。从病原体“视角”来看,病原体可接触的网络部分的特征,即性接触的网络结构,与整个网络的特征有很大不同。病原体本身在决定这种有效网络结构方面起着重要作用;具体而言,我们发现,如果病原体的传染性持续时间较短,即使所有其他因素保持不变,感染也更集中在高活跃度、高并发率的个体中。针对高风险个体的后续干预措施将加强广泛的筛查计划,因为筛查会缩短预期的传染性持续时间,并且与高活跃度个体相比,低活跃度个体中的患病率相对下降幅度更大。即使对于传染性持续时间较长的病原体,我们的研究结果表明,针对高活跃度个体进行疫苗接种和行为干预与全人群干预相比,能带来相当的益处。

相似文献

1
The dynamics of sexual contact networks: effects on disease spread and control.性接触网络的动态变化:对疾病传播和控制的影响。
Theor Popul Biol. 2012 Mar;81(2):89-96. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2011.12.009. Epub 2012 Jan 8.
2
Capturing sexual contact patterns in modelling the spread of sexually transmitted infections: Evidence using Natsal-3.在建模性传播感染传播中捕捉性接触模式:使用 Natsal-3 的证据。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 1;13(11):e0206501. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0206501. eCollection 2018.
3
Concurrency of partnerships, consistency with data, and control of sexually transmitted infections.伴侣关系的同时性、与数据的一致性和性传播感染的控制。
Epidemics. 2018 Dec;25:35-46. doi: 10.1016/j.epidem.2018.05.003. Epub 2018 May 14.
4
More realistic models of sexually transmitted disease transmission dynamics: sexual partnership networks, pair models, and moment closure.更现实的性传播疾病传播动力学模型:性伴侣网络、配对模型和矩量闭合。
Sex Transm Dis. 2000 Nov;27(10):600-9. doi: 10.1097/00007435-200011000-00008.
5
Monogamous networks and the spread of sexually transmitted diseases.一夫一妻制关系网络与性传播疾病的传播
Math Biosci. 2004 Jun;189(2):115-30. doi: 10.1016/j.mbs.2004.02.003.
6
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
7
Partnership dynamics in mathematical models and implications for representation of sexually transmitted infections: a review.数学模型中的伙伴关系动态及其对性传播感染表示的影响:综述。
Ann Epidemiol. 2021 Jul;59:72-80. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2021.04.012. Epub 2021 Apr 28.
8
Modelling the impact of alternative HIV intervention strategies in rural Uganda.模拟乌干达农村地区替代艾滋病干预策略的影响。
AIDS. 1995 Nov;9(11):1263-70. doi: 10.1097/00002030-199511000-00008.
9
Sexual networks and sexually transmitted infections: innovations and findings.性网络和性传播感染:创新与发现。
Curr Opin Infect Dis. 2011 Feb;24(1):70-7. doi: 10.1097/QCO.0b013e3283422647.
10
Determinants and consequences of sexual networks as they affect the spread of sexually transmitted infections.性网络的决定因素及其对性传播感染传播的影响和后果。
J Infect Dis. 2005 Feb 1;191 Suppl 1:S42-54. doi: 10.1086/425277.

引用本文的文献

1
Pathogen transmission modes determine contact network structure, altering other pathogen characteristics.病原体传播方式决定了接触网络结构,从而改变了其他病原体特征。
Proc Biol Sci. 2022 Dec 21;289(1989):20221389. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2022.1389. Epub 2022 Dec 14.
2
Understanding the survival of Zika virus in a vector interconnected sexual contact network.了解寨卡病毒在具有相互关联的性接触网络的媒介中的存活情况。
Sci Rep. 2019 May 10;9(1):7253. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-43651-3.
3
A dynamic power-law sexual network model of gonorrhoea outbreaks.

本文引用的文献

1
Transmission of Chlamydia trachomatis through sexual partnerships: a comparison between three individual-based models and empirical data.性伴侣传播沙眼衣原体:三种个体为基础的模型与经验数据的比较。
J R Soc Interface. 2012 Jan 7;9(66):136-46. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2011.0131. Epub 2011 Jun 8.
2
Simulated epidemics in an empirical spatiotemporal network of 50,185 sexual contacts.在一个包含 50185 名性接触者的经验时空网络中模拟传染病流行。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Mar;7(3):e1001109. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001109. Epub 2011 Mar 17.
3
Estimating duration in partnership studies: issues, methods and examples.
淋病疫情的动态幂律性性传播网络模型。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Mar 8;15(3):e1006748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006748. eCollection 2019 Mar.
4
Phylogenies from dynamic networks.动态网络的系统发育。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2019 Feb 26;15(2):e1006761. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1006761. eCollection 2019 Feb.
5
Bipartite graphs in systems biology and medicine: a survey of methods and applications.系统生物学和医学中的二部图:方法和应用综述。
Gigascience. 2018 Apr 1;7(4):1-31. doi: 10.1093/gigascience/giy014.
6
A Metric on Phylogenetic Tree Shapes.系统发育树形状的一种度量。
Syst Biol. 2018 Jan 1;67(1):113-126. doi: 10.1093/sysbio/syx046.
7
Behavioural change models for infectious disease transmission: a systematic review (2010-2015).传染病传播的行为改变模型:一项系统综述(2010 - 2015年)
J R Soc Interface. 2016 Dec;13(125). doi: 10.1098/rsif.2016.0820.
8
A molecular transmission network of recent hepatitis C infection in people with and without HIV: Implications for targeted treatment strategies.合并或未合并人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)感染者近期丙型肝炎病毒感染的分子传播网络:对靶向治疗策略的启示
J Viral Hepat. 2017 May;24(5):404-411. doi: 10.1111/jvh.12652. Epub 2016 Nov 24.
9
Effects of memory on the shapes of simple outbreak trees.记忆对简单爆发树形状的影响。
Sci Rep. 2016 Feb 18;6:21159. doi: 10.1038/srep21159.
10
Evolution and emergence of infectious diseases in theoretical and real-world networks.理论与现实网络中传染病的演变与出现
Nat Commun. 2015 Jan 16;6:6101. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7101.
伴侣关系研究中的持续时间估计:问题、方法与实例。
Sex Transm Infect. 2010 Apr;86(2):84-9. doi: 10.1136/sti.2009.037960.
4
Concurrent partnerships and HIV prevalence disparities by race: linking science and public health practice.同时存在的性伙伴关系与不同种族间的艾滋病毒流行率差异:连接科学与公共卫生实践
Am J Public Health. 2009 Jun;99(6):1023-31. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2008.147835. Epub 2009 Apr 16.
5
Recent heterosexual partnerships and patterns of condom use: a weighted analysis.
Epidemiology. 2009 Jan;20(1):44-51. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0b013e318187ac81.
6
Mind the gap: the role of time between sex with two consecutive partners on the transmission dynamics of gonorrhea.注意间隔:与两个连续伴侣发生性行为的时间间隔对淋病传播动态的作用。
Sex Transm Dis. 2008 May;35(5):435-44. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181612d33.
7
Adaptive coevolutionary networks: a review.自适应协同进化网络:综述
J R Soc Interface. 2008 Mar 6;5(20):259-71. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2007.1229.
8
How disease models in static networks can fail to approximate disease in dynamic networks.
Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2007 Sep;76(3 Pt 1):031919. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.76.031919. Epub 2007 Sep 19.
9
Network frailty and the geometry of herd immunity.网络脆弱性与群体免疫的几何学
Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Nov 7;273(1602):2743-8. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2006.3636.
10
Global and regional burden of disease and risk factors, 2001: systematic analysis of population health data.《2001年全球和区域疾病负担及风险因素:对人群健康数据的系统分析》
Lancet. 2006 May 27;367(9524):1747-57. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68770-9.