Center for Industrial Ecology, School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University, 195 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT 06511, United States.
Sci Total Environ. 2012 Feb 15;417-418:138-47. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.09.075. Epub 2012 Jan 16.
Metals are used in a variety of ways, many of which lead to dissipative releases to the environment. Such releases are relevant from both a resource use and an environmental impact perspective. We present a historical analysis of copper dissipative releases in the United States from 1975 to 2000. We situate all dissipative releases in copper's life cycle and introduce a conceptual framework by which copper dissipative releases may be categorized in terms of intentionality of use and release. We interpret our results in the context of larger trends in production and consumption and government policies that have served as drivers of intentional copper releases from the relevant sources. Intentional copper releases are found to be both significant in quantity and highly variable. In 1975, for example, the largest source of intentional releases was from the application of copper-based pesticides, and this decreased more than 50% over the next 25 years; all other sources of intentional releases increased during that period. Overall, intentional copper releases decreased by approximately 15% from 1975 to 2000. Intentional uses that are unintentionally released such as copper from roofing, increased by the same percentage. Trace contaminant sources such as fossil fuel combustion, i.e., sources where both the use and the release are unintended, increased by nearly 50%. Intentional dissipative uses are equivalent to 60% of unintentional copper dissipative releases and more than five times that from trace sources. Dissipative copper releases are revealed to be modest when compared to bulk copper flows in the economy, and we introduce a metric, the dissipation index, which may be considered an economy-wide measure of resource efficiency for a particular substance. We assess the importance of dissipative releases in the calculation of recycling rates, concluding that the inclusion of dissipation in recycling rate calculations has a small, but discernible, influence, and should be included in such calculations.
金属的用途多种多样,其中许多用途会导致金属向环境中释放。从资源利用和环境影响的角度来看,这些释放都很重要。本文对 1975 年至 2000 年美国铜的耗散释放进行了历史分析。我们将所有耗散释放置于铜的生命周期中,并提出了一个概念框架,根据使用和释放的意图,对铜的耗散释放进行分类。我们在更大的生产和消费趋势以及政府政策的背景下解释我们的结果,这些政策是从相关来源有针对性地释放铜的驱动因素。有针对性的铜释放不仅数量大,而且变化幅度大。例如,1975 年,最大的有针对性的铜释放源是铜基农药的应用,而在接下来的 25 年中,这一数字下降了 50%以上;在此期间,其他有针对性的铜释放源都有所增加。总体而言,1975 年至 2000 年,有针对性的铜释放减少了约 15%。非故意释放的有针对性用途,如来自屋顶的铜,增加了相同的百分比。痕量污染物来源,如化石燃料燃烧,即使用和释放都是无意的,增加了近 50%。有意耗散用途相当于无意耗散铜释放的 60%,是痕量来源的五倍多。与经济中的铜总流量相比,耗散铜释放量适中,我们引入了一个指标,即耗散指数,它可以被视为特定物质的资源效率的全经济范围衡量标准。我们评估了耗散释放对回收率计算的重要性,得出的结论是,将耗散纳入回收率计算会产生较小但可察觉的影响,应将其纳入此类计算。