Carvalho Rodrigo, Marques-Pinto Gabriela, Cardoso Jorge
Curry Cabral Hospital, Dermatology and Venereology Department, Lisbon, Portugal.
Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2013 Mar;32(1):78-82. doi: 10.3109/15569527.2011.647182. Epub 2012 Jan 18.
During the last half of the 20th century, the use of UVB therapy and photochemotherapy (PUVA), were one of the mainstays of treatment for psoriasis. However, accompanying to the advent of the most recent era of psoriasis, with targeted biologic therapy has been a decline in the frequency of phototherapy. This does not diminish its known clinical effects.
To perform a retrospective analysis of demographic, clinical and therapeutic variables of psoriatic patients treated with phototherapy in the last 10 years, when biological therapies become available. Also, review some of the published phototherapy and biological therapy data in psoriasis.
Psoriatic patients were treated between 1st January 2000 and 31st December 2010 in a Lisbon Phototherapeutic unit. Psoriatic arthritis patients were excluded. Regimes used included PUVA (systemic or topical), Re PUVA, UVAB (broad band) or combined options.
During this period, 211 patients were treated with phototherapy; 40% (85/211) UVAB, 31% (64/211) topical PUVA, 23% (49/211) systemic PUVA and 6% (13/211) Re PUVA. Mean follow-up period was 18 months (Min 1; Max 120). The average age was 45 years old (mean 44.80; Min 10; Max 80; SD 16.31), 54% (114/211) of patients were female and 46% (97/211) were male. Of all 211 psoriasis patients, 54% (144/211) had plaque psoriasis diagnosis, 31% (66/211) palmoplantar psoriasis and 15% (41/211) guttate psoriasis. Regardless the phototherapy modality used, substantial BSA improvements were achieved in all psoriasis groups.
Current advancements in therapeutics enjoyed today include the advent of the biologics and other immunomodulating systemic agents. However, attending to the responses achieved, and considering other variables like well-known side effects and cost, photo(chemo)therapy will remain an essential method of treatment for psoriasis vulgaris in the 21st century.
在20世纪后半叶,窄谱中波紫外线(UVB)疗法和光化学疗法(补骨脂素紫外线A,PUVA)是银屑病治疗的主要手段之一。然而,随着银屑病最新治疗时代的到来,靶向生物疗法的出现使得光疗的使用频率有所下降。但这并不影响其已知的临床疗效。
对过去10年有生物疗法可用时接受光疗的银屑病患者的人口统计学、临床和治疗变量进行回顾性分析。同时,回顾一些已发表的关于银屑病光疗和生物疗法的数据。
2000年1月1日至2010年12月31日期间,在里斯本一家光疗机构对银屑病患者进行治疗。排除银屑病关节炎患者。使用的治疗方案包括PUVA(全身或局部)、Re PUVA、UVAB(宽带)或联合方案。
在此期间,211例患者接受了光疗;40%(85/211)为UVAB,31%(64/211)为局部PUVA,23%(49/211)为全身PUVA,6%(13/211)为Re PUVA。平均随访期为18个月(最短1个月;最长120个月)。平均年龄为45岁(平均44.80岁;最小10岁;最大80岁;标准差16.31),54%(114/211)的患者为女性,46%(97/211)为男性。在所有211例银屑病患者中,54%(144/211)被诊断为斑块状银屑病,31%(66/211)为掌跖部银屑病,15%(41/211)为点滴状银屑病。无论采用何种光疗方式,所有银屑病组的体表面积均有显著改善。
当今治疗学的最新进展包括生物制剂和其他免疫调节全身药物的出现。然而,考虑到所取得的疗效,并考虑到其他变量,如众所周知的副作用和成本,光(化学)疗法在2l世纪仍将是寻常型银屑病的一种重要治疗方法。