Agri-Food and Biosciences Institute, Hillsborough, Co. Down, UK.
Poult Sci. 2012 Feb;91(2):304-15. doi: 10.3382/ps.2011-01774.
The aim of this trial was to determine the effect of aerial perches on keel bone injuries and tibia bone characteristics in free-range laying hens. The relationship between keel bone injuries and individual bird parameters, such as weight, girth, wing:girth ratio, feather coverage, and tibia bone characteristics, was also assessed. Five commercial free-range houses, each containing between 7,000 and 8,000 birds, were used. The houses and range areas were divided in half; in half of the house, birds had access to aerial perches (P) and in the other half, they did not (NP). On 13 occasions between 17 and 70 wk of age, 20 birds per treatment were randomly selected from the slatted area and palpated for keel bone injury. At 72 wk of age, 30 birds per treatment in each of 4 houses were selected at random, weighed, and then euthanized. Girth and wing area and feather coverage were measured. The keel and left tibia bones were removed and keel bones were scored for injury. Tibia bones were weighed and diameter, length, breaking strength, and ash content recorded. Results indicated that access to aerial perches did not affect tibia bone measures (P > 0.05). Average palpated keel bone score increased with age of the hens (P < 0.001) but was not significantly affected by perch treatment (P > 0.05). There was a significant interaction between treatment and farm on keel bone injuries measured at dissection (P < 0.05), with the probability of birds having high keel-damage scores increasing in the perched treatment in some farms but not others. In general, as the keel bone injury score measured at dissection increased, the breaking strength (P < 0.001) and ash content (P < 0.05) of the tibia bone decreased. It is suggested that individual variation in bone strength contributes to differences in susceptibility to keel injury. No relationship existed between keel-injury score measured at dissection and individual parameters, such as weight, girth, or wing:girth ratio (P > 0.05), although feather coverage tended to decline with increasing keel damage (P < 0.06).
本试验旨在确定架空栖木对放养母鸡龙骨骨损伤和胫骨骨特性的影响。还评估了龙骨骨损伤与个体鸟参数(如体重、胸围、翅膀:胸围比、羽毛覆盖率和胫骨骨特性)之间的关系。使用了 5 个商业放养房屋,每个房屋容纳 7000 到 8000 只鸡。房屋和围场区域被分为两半;一半的鸡舍中,鸡只可以使用架空栖木(P),另一半鸡舍中,鸡只不能使用架空栖木(NP)。在 17 到 70 周龄之间的 13 个时间点,从格栅区随机选择每个处理组的 20 只鸡进行龙骨骨损伤触诊。在 72 周龄时,从 4 个房屋的每个处理组中随机选择 30 只鸡进行称重,然后安乐死。测量胸围和翅膀面积和羽毛覆盖率。取出龙骨和左胫骨骨,对龙骨骨进行损伤评分。胫骨骨称重,并记录直径、长度、断裂强度和灰分含量。结果表明,使用架空栖木不影响胫骨骨测量值(P > 0.05)。平均触诊龙骨骨评分随母鸡年龄的增长而增加(P < 0.001),但不受栖木处理的显著影响(P > 0.05)。在剖检时测量的龙骨骨损伤方面,处理和农场之间存在显著的相互作用(P < 0.05),在一些农场中,使用架空栖木的鸡群中,高龙骨损伤评分的鸡群的可能性增加,但在其他农场中则没有。一般来说,随着剖检时测量的龙骨骨损伤评分增加,胫骨骨的断裂强度(P < 0.001)和灰分含量(P < 0.05)降低。这表明骨骼强度的个体差异导致对龙骨损伤的易感性不同。剖检时测量的龙骨损伤评分与体重、胸围或翅膀:胸围比等个体参数之间没有关系(P > 0.05),尽管羽毛覆盖率随着龙骨损伤的增加而趋于下降(P < 0.06)。