• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Development of needs and resources for self-management assessment instrument in Thais with type 2 diabetes: cross-cultural adaptation.

作者信息

Manit Ananya, Tuicomepee Arunya, Jiamjarasrangsi Wiroj, Taneepanichskul Surasak

机构信息

College of Public Health Sciences, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand.

出版信息

J Med Assoc Thai. 2011 Nov;94(11):1304-13.

PMID:22256469
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

(1) To develop the Chronic Illness Resources Survey (CIRS) questionnaire for Thais with type 2 diabetes and (2) to examine validity and reliability of the instrument.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

The present study consisted of two phases, phrase I was development of the comprehensive assessment form, for which the qualitative study was utilized and Glasgow's original CIRS was used as the initial input, and phrases II was tested for validity and reliability of the assessment form, for which quantitative study design was utilized.

RESULTS

Final version of Thai comprehensive CIRS composed of 60 items in seven subscales, physician and health care team, family and friends, personal, community, neighborhood, media and policy, and community organization. Worksites subscale was deleted if it differed from original version. Its internal consistency was 0.93 (Cronbach's alpha coefficient = 0.93, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrates that the Thai CIRS is appropriate for Thai patients with type 2 diabetes. The instrument has acceptable validity and reliability. However, further research is required to evaluate these properties in other areas. Furthermore, the Thais CIRS should examine psychometric properties before it will be used in other chronic illness patients.

摘要

相似文献

1
Development of needs and resources for self-management assessment instrument in Thais with type 2 diabetes: cross-cultural adaptation.
J Med Assoc Thai. 2011 Nov;94(11):1304-13.
2
Reliability and validity of a Thai version of the General Practice Assessment Questionnaire (GPAQ).泰语版全科医疗评估问卷(GPAQ)的信度和效度
J Med Assoc Thai. 2006 Sep;89(9):1491-6.
3
Reliability and validity of a Thai version of the edmonton symptom assessment scale (ESAS-Thai).泰国埃德蒙顿症状评估量表(ESAS-Thai)的信度和效度。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Dec;42(6):954-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.02.020. Epub 2011 May 31.
4
Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Short-form Supportive Care Needs Survey questionnaire (SCNS-SF34-J).日本版简明支持性护理需求调查问卷(SCNS-SF34-J)的信效度
Psychooncology. 2009 Sep;18(9):1003-10. doi: 10.1002/pon.1482.
5
Development of the Italian version of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale, NPDS-I: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity.意大利版颈部疼痛与功能障碍量表(NPDS-I)的研制:跨文化调适、信度与效度
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jun 1;33(13):E429-34. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318175c2b0.
6
Validation of the Italian version of the WHO-Well-Being Questionnaire (WHO-WBQ) and the WHO-Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (WHO-DTSQ).世界卫生组织幸福问卷(WHO-WBQ)意大利语版本及世界卫生组织糖尿病治疗满意度问卷(WHO-DTSQ)的验证
Diabetes Nutr Metab. 2004 Aug;17(4):235-43.
7
Reliability and validity of a Thai version of assessment of chronic illness care (ACIC).泰国版慢性病照护评估量表(ACIC)的信效度研究
J Med Assoc Thai. 2012 Aug;95(8):1105-13.
8
Development of a Chinese short form of the Prenatal Self-Evaluation Questionnaire.中文短版产前自评问卷的编制。
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Mar;18(5):659-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2007.02201.x.
9
Development and validation of diabetes empowerment questionnaire in Iranian people with type 2 diabetes.2 型糖尿病伊朗患者糖尿病自我管理效能感问卷的编制及信效度检验。
Int Nurs Rev. 2013 Jun;60(2):267-73. doi: 10.1111/inr.12007. Epub 2013 Feb 20.
10
Development and validation of the Chinese version of the Diabetes Management Self-efficacy Scale.中文版糖尿病管理自我效能量表的编制与验证
Int J Nurs Stud. 2008 Apr;45(4):534-42. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2006.08.020. Epub 2006 Oct 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Diabetes self-management and its associated factors among patients with diabetes in central Vietnam: A cross-sectional study.越南中部糖尿病患者的自我管理及其相关因素:一项横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2022 Jul 8;17(7):e0270901. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0270901. eCollection 2022.
2
Process evaluation protocol of a cluster randomised trial for a scalable solution for delivery of Diabetes Self-Management Education in Thailand (DSME-T).一项针对泰国糖尿病自我管理教育(DSME-T)可扩展解决方案的集群随机试验的过程评估方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 9;11(12):e056141. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056141.
3
Measurement Properties of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures for Diabetes: Systematic Review.
糖尿病患者报告结局测量量表的测量特性:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Aug 13;23(8):e25002. doi: 10.2196/25002.
4
Scalable solution for delivery of diabetes self-management education in Thailand (DSME-T): a cluster randomised trial study protocol.泰国糖尿病自我管理教育(DSME-T)的可扩展解决方案:一项整群随机试验研究方案
BMJ Open. 2020 Oct 5;10(10):e036963. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-036963.
5
Perceived resource support for chronic illnesses among diabetics in north-western China.中国西北部糖尿病患者对慢性病的感知资源支持情况。
Front Med. 2016 Jun;10(2):219-27. doi: 10.1007/s11684-016-0441-3. Epub 2016 Apr 13.