Perrott Margaret A, Pizzari Tania, Opar Mark, Cook Jill
Musculoskeletal Research Centre, La Trobe University, Bundoora, VIC 3086, Australia.
Rehabil Res Pract. 2012;2012:803637. doi: 10.1155/2012/803637. Epub 2011 Dec 29.
Background. Lumbopelvic stability (LPS) is regarded as important for injury prevention, yet there are few reliable or valid tests that can be used in the clinical assessment of LPS. Three dynamic functional tests were identified that assess LPS in multiple planes of motion: dip test (DT), single leg squat (SLS), and runner pose test (RPT). Existing rating criteria for SLS have limited reliability and rating criteria for DT and RPT have not been established. Objective. To develop rating criteria for three clinical tests of LPS. Design. Qualitative research: focus group. Method. A focus group of five expert physiotherapists used qualitative methods to develop rating criteria for the three clinical tests. Results. Detailed rating criteria were established for the three tests. Each key factor considered important for LPS had characteristics described that represented both good and poor LPS. Conclusion. This study established rating criteria that may be used to clinically assess LPS.
背景。腰骨盆稳定性（LPS）被认为对预防损伤很重要，但在LPS的临床评估中，几乎没有可靠或有效的测试方法。已确定三种动态功能测试可在多个运动平面评估LPS：下蹲测试（DT）、单腿深蹲（SLS）和跑步姿势测试（RPT）。现有的SLS评分标准可靠性有限，而DT和RPT的评分标准尚未建立。目的。为LPS的三项临床试验制定评分标准。设计。定性研究：焦点小组。方法。由五名专家物理治疗师组成的焦点小组采用定性方法为三项临床试验制定评分标准。结果。为这三项测试建立了详细的评分标准。每个被认为对LPS重要的关键因素都有代表良好和不良LPS的特征描述。结论。本研究建立了可用于临床评估LPS的评分标准。
