Department of Education and Child Studies, Leiden University, 2300 RB Leiden, The Netherlands.
J Exp Child Psychol. 2012 May;112(1):36-55. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2011.12.003. Epub 2012 Jan 20.
The goals of this study were to examine (a) whether extratextual vocabulary instructions embedded in electronic storybooks facilitated word learning over reading alone and (b) whether instructional formats that required children to invest more effort were more effective than formats that required less effort. A computer-based "assistant" was added to electronic storybooks. The assistant posed extratextual vocabulary questions. Questions were presented in a multiple-choice format so that children could respond by clicking on the picture that best represented the target word. In Experiment 1 (N=20), children read stories with and without questions. Children learned more words when reading with questions than without. Expressive vocabulary was particularly affected by question insertion. In Experiment 2 (N=27), we used two methods for teaching words: one requiring more effort on the part of children (questions) and one requiring less effort ("hotspots" that provide definitions). Results revealed that questions were more beneficial than just providing a definition or synonym of the target word. Implications for designing new e-book apps are discussed.
(a) 电子故事书中嵌入的超文本词汇指导是否有助于阅读以外的单词学习,以及 (b) 需要儿童投入更多精力的教学格式是否比需要较少精力的格式更有效。在电子故事书中添加了基于计算机的“助手”。助手提出了超文本词汇问题。问题以多项选择的形式呈现,以便孩子们可以通过点击最能代表目标单词的图片来回答。在实验 1(N=20)中,孩子们阅读有问题和没有问题的故事。与没有问题的阅读相比,孩子们在有问题的阅读中学习了更多的单词。表达性词汇特别受到问题插入的影响。在实验 2(N=27)中,我们使用了两种教授单词的方法:一种需要儿童付出更多努力(问题),另一种需要较少努力(提供定义的“热点”)。结果表明,问题比仅仅提供目标单词的定义或同义词更有益。讨论了设计新的电子书应用程序的意义。