Takacs Zsofia K, Bus Adriana G
Institute of Education, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Eötvös Loránd UniversityBudapest, Hungary; Learning Problems and Impairments, Institute of Education and Child Studies, Leiden UniversityLeiden, Netherlands.
Learning Problems and Impairments, Institute of Education and Child Studies, Leiden University Leiden, Netherlands.
Front Psychol. 2016 Oct 13;7:1591. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01591. eCollection 2016.
The present study provides experimental evidence regarding 4-6-year-old children's visual processing of animated versus static illustrations in storybooks. Thirty nine participants listened to an animated and a static book, both three times, while eye movements were registered with an eye-tracker. Outcomes corroborate the hypothesis that specifically motion is what attracts children's attention while looking at illustrations. It is proposed that animated illustrations that are well matched to the text of the story guide children to those parts of the illustration that are important for understanding the story. This may explain why animated books resulted in better comprehension than static books.
本研究提供了关于4至6岁儿童对故事书中动画与静态插图的视觉处理的实验证据。39名参与者分别听了一本动画书和一本静态书,各听三遍,同时用眼动仪记录他们的眼动情况。结果证实了这样一个假设,即在观看插图时,正是运动吸引了儿童的注意力。有人提出,与故事文本匹配良好的动画插图会引导儿童关注插图中对理解故事很重要的部分。这或许可以解释为什么动画书比静态书能带来更好的理解效果。