Sobrino-Vegas Paz, Rodríguez-Urrego Johana, Berenguer Juan, Caro-Murillo Ana María, Blanco José Ramón, Viciana Pompeyo, Moreno Santiago, Bernardino Ignacio, del Amo Julia
Red de Investigación en Sida, Centro Nacional de Epidemiología, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Antivir Ther. 2012;17(1):1-8. doi: 10.3851/IMP1939.
The aim of this study was to analyse associations between educational level and delayed HIV diagnosis (DD), late initiation of combined antiretroviral therapy (cART), overall and in subjects with timely HIV diagnosis, virological and immunological responses to cART, and mortality from HIV diagnosis and cART initiation.
This was a multicentre cohort study of HIV-positive treatment-naive subjects in Spain between 2004-2009. Logistic and Cox regression analyses were used.
Of 4,549 subjects, 44.5% had low education level (LOW), 34.4% medium education level (MED) and 21.1% high education level (HIG). In men, DD was more common in MED (OR 1.3 [95% CI 1.0, 1.7]) or LOW [OR 1.8 (95% CI 1.4, 2.3)] compared to HIG. In women, the opposite was observed; women with HIG were 40% more likely to have DD than those with LOW (OR 1.4 [95% CI 0.8, 2.5]). In individuals with timely HIV diagnoses, percentages of late cART initiators were similar (LOW 9.5%, MED 11.4% and HIG 7.0%; P=0.114). Immunological (LOW 68%, MED 76% and HIG 84%) and virological (LOW 76%, MED 83% and HIG 86%) responses to cART increased significantly with educational level; these increases remained significant in multivariate analyses. Mortality for LOW subjects was higher than for HIG, from HIV diagnosis (hazard ratio [HR] 2.3 [95% CI 1.1, 4.9]) and from cART initiation (HR 1.8 [95% CI 0.8, 3.9]).
We found important differences by educational level in diagnosis delay, virological and immunological responses to cART and mortality in a country with universal health care. Women with high educational level are at higher risk of having delayed HIV diagnoses. Educational level should be taken into account when designing HIV testing and clinical management strategies.
本研究旨在分析教育水平与HIV诊断延迟(DD)、联合抗逆转录病毒治疗(cART)开始时间较晚、在HIV诊断及时的受试者中总体情况以及cART的病毒学和免疫学反应,以及从HIV诊断和开始cART到死亡之间的关联。
这是一项对2004年至2009年西班牙未接受过治疗的HIV阳性受试者进行的多中心队列研究。采用逻辑回归和Cox回归分析。
在4549名受试者中,44.5%教育水平低(LOW),34.4%教育水平中等(MED),21.1%教育水平高(HIG)。在男性中,与HIG相比,MED(比值比[OR]1.3[95%置信区间1.0,1.7])或LOW[OR 1.8(95%置信区间1.4,2.3)]中DD更为常见。在女性中,观察到相反的情况;HIG的女性发生DD的可能性比LOW的女性高40%(OR 1.4[95%置信区间0.8,2.5])。在HIV诊断及时的个体中,cART开始较晚者的百分比相似(LOW为9.5%,MED为11.4%,HIG为7.0%;P = 0.114)。cART的免疫学(LOW为68%,MED为76%,HIG为84%)和病毒学(LOW为76%,MED为83%,HIG为86%)反应随教育水平显著增加;在多变量分析中,这些增加仍然显著。LOW受试者的死亡率高于HIG受试者,从HIV诊断时起(风险比[HR]2.3[95%置信区间1.1,4.9])以及从开始cART时起(HR 1.8[95%置信区间0.8,3.9])。
在一个拥有全民医疗保健的国家,我们发现教育水平在诊断延迟、cART的病毒学和免疫学反应以及死亡率方面存在重要差异。教育水平高的女性HIV诊断延迟的风险更高。在设计HIV检测和临床管理策略时应考虑教育水平。