• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

对临终患者和高危死亡患者进行研究的伦理挑战。

Ethical challenges in conducting research on dying patients and those at high risk of dying.

机构信息

Ethics Center, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

Account Res. 2012;19(1):1-12. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2011.622173.

DOI:10.1080/08989621.2011.622173
PMID:22268501
Abstract

Clinical research to improve care across the broad spectrum of health care has led to better quantity and quality of life for many patients. However, imposing arbitrary restrictions that might result in the exclusion from clinical research of patients who are at the end of life, or patients with a high risk of dying, is undesirable. Such exclusions may violate the principle of justice, by denying these patients a valid opportunity to make an important socio-medical contribution, and could make it difficult or impossible to advance clinical knowledge about the care of these patients. This article reviews issues relevant to the conduct of research on dying patients and those who are at high risk of dying, and outlines special considerations for ensuring that such research is ethical. In particular, precautions should be taken to ensure that informed consent is obtained from patients who are capable (or their substitute decision maker if the patient is not capable), free from coercion, and not harboring false expectations about the likelihood of benefiting from the study intervention. The unique circumstances surrounding the timing of this research (at the end of life or potentially there) may warrant that some patients be considered vulnerable, requiring special protective measures. Adhering to these principles will help ensure that dying patients or patients at high risk of dying can still participate in research that has the potential to advance knowledge and improve future care.

摘要

临床研究改善了广泛的医疗保健服务,为数以百万计的患者带来了更高的生活质量和更好的生活体验。然而,任意施加限制,可能会导致处于生命末期或死亡风险较高的患者被排除在临床研究之外,这是不可取的。这种排除可能违反公正原则,剥夺了这些患者做出重要社会医疗贡献的机会,并且可能使我们难以或无法推进有关这些患者护理的临床知识。本文回顾了与临终患者和高死亡风险患者的研究相关的问题,并概述了确保此类研究符合伦理规范的特殊考虑因素。特别应注意确保有能力的患者(或如果患者没有能力,则由其替代决策者)获得知情同意,不受胁迫,并且对从研究干预中获益的可能性没有错误的期望。这项研究(在生命末期或可能存在)的时间安排所带来的特殊情况可能使一些患者被认为是脆弱的,需要特殊的保护措施。坚持这些原则将有助于确保临终患者或高死亡风险患者仍能参与有潜力推进知识并改善未来护理的研究。

相似文献

1
Ethical challenges in conducting research on dying patients and those at high risk of dying.对临终患者和高危死亡患者进行研究的伦理挑战。
Account Res. 2012;19(1):1-12. doi: 10.1080/08989621.2011.622173.
2
End-stage heart disease, high-risk research, and competence to consent: the case of the AbioCor artificial heart.终末期心脏病、高风险研究与同意能力:以阿比奥科人工心脏为例
Perspect Biol Med. 2006 Winter;49(1):19-34. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2006.0013.
3
Voluntary informed consent in research and clinical care: an update.研究与临床医疗中的自愿知情同意:最新情况
Pain Pract. 2008 Nov-Dec;8(6):446-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2008.00241.x.
4
Feasibility of conducting prospective observational research on critically ill, dying patients in the intensive care unit.在重症监护病房对重症濒死患者进行前瞻性观察性研究的可行性。
J Med Ethics. 2017 Jan;43(1):47-51. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2016-103683. Epub 2016 Oct 13.
5
[The origin of informed consent].[知情同意的起源]
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2005 Oct;25(5):312-27.
6
Challenges in conducting end-of-life research in critical care.在重症监护中开展临终研究面临的挑战。
AACN Adv Crit Care. 2008 Apr-Jun;19(2):170-7. doi: 10.1097/01.AACN.0000318120.67061.82.
7
[Ethical decision-making at the end of life--knowledge and attitudes of medical students].[临终阶段的伦理决策——医学生的知识与态度]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2004 Jul 9;129(28-29):1556-60. doi: 10.1055/s-2004-828989.
8
Protecting participants of clinical trials conducted in the intensive care unit.保护重症监护病房临床试验的参与者。
J Intensive Care Med. 2011 Jul-Aug;26(4):237-49. doi: 10.1177/0885066610390867.
9
Rituals, death and the moral practice of medical futility.仪式、死亡与医疗无效性的道德实践
Nurs Ethics. 2009 May;16(3):292-302. doi: 10.1177/0969733009102691.
10
Ethical issues in schizophrenia: considerations for treatment and research.精神分裂症中的伦理问题:治疗与研究的考量
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2007;40(4):145-55.

引用本文的文献

1
Research Ethics Challenges, Controversies and Difficulties in Intensive Care Units-A Systematic Review of Theoretical Concepts.重症监护病房中的研究伦理挑战、争议与困难——理论概念的系统综述
Nurs Rep. 2025 May 7;15(5):164. doi: 10.3390/nursrep15050164.
2
Epistemic Humility in the Age of Assisted Dying.安乐死时代的认知谦逊。
Hastings Cent Rep. 2025 Mar;55(2):8-14. doi: 10.1002/hast.4960.
3
Dexmedetomidine Versus Midazolam for End-of-Life Sedation and Agitation: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial (The DREAMS Trial).
右美托咪定对比咪达唑仑用于终末镇静和激越:一项随机对照试验方案(DREAMS 试验)。
JMIR Res Protoc. 2024 Sep 4;13:e55129. doi: 10.2196/55129.
4
Perceived risks and benefits of enrolling people with HIV at the end of life in cure research in Southern California, United States.在美国南加州,临终时让艾滋病毒感染者参与治愈研究的感知风险与益处。
J Virus Erad. 2023 Jun 5;9(2):100328. doi: 10.1016/j.jve.2023.100328. eCollection 2023 Jun.
5
Perspectives of Academic Oncologists About Offering Expanded Access to Investigational Drugs.学术肿瘤学家对提供扩展获得研究性药物的看法。
JAMA Netw Open. 2022 Nov 1;5(11):e2239766. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.39766.
6
Meeting ethical challenges with authenticity when engaging patients and families in end-of-life and palliative care research: a qualitative study.在终末期和姑息治疗研究中与患者及其家属接触时保持真实性以应对伦理挑战:一项定性研究。
BMC Palliat Care. 2022 May 16;21(1):74. doi: 10.1186/s12904-022-00964-x.
7
Barriers and challenges in the process of including critically ill patients in clinical studies.纳入危重症患者参与临床研究的过程中的障碍和挑战。
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020 Jun 8;28(1):51. doi: 10.1186/s13049-020-00732-x.
8
Ethical considerations for HIV cure-related research at the end of life.临终时与治愈艾滋病相关研究的伦理考量。
BMC Med Ethics. 2018 Oct 20;19(1):83. doi: 10.1186/s12910-018-0321-2.
9
Willingness to participate in HIV research at the end of life (EOL).临终前参与 HIV 研究的意愿。
PLoS One. 2018 Jul 23;13(7):e0199670. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0199670. eCollection 2018.
10
Waiver of consent in noninterventional, observational emergency research: the PROMMTT experience.非干预性、观察性急诊研究中同意的豁免:PROMMTT 经验。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013 Jul;75(1 Suppl 1):S3-8. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31828fa3a0.