• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

理解手术相关不良事件根本原因分析调查。

Making sense of root cause analysis investigations of surgery-related adverse events.

机构信息

University of Western Sydney, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Locked Bag 1797, Penrith South DC, New South Wales 1797, Australia.

出版信息

Surg Clin North Am. 2012 Feb;92(1):101-15. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2011.12.008.

DOI:10.1016/j.suc.2011.12.008
PMID:22269264
Abstract

This article discusses the limitations of root cause analysis (RCA) for surgical adverse events. Making sense of adverse events involves an appreciation of the unique features in a problematic situation, which resist generalization to other contexts. The top priority of adverse event investigations must be to inform the design of systems that help clinicians to adapt and respond effectively in real time to undesirable combinations of design, performance, and circumstance. RCAs can create opportunities in the clinical workplace for clinicians to reflect on local barriers and identify enablers of safe and reliable outcomes.

摘要

本文讨论了根本原因分析(RCA)在外科不良事件中的局限性。理解不良事件需要对特定情况下的独特特征有一个认识,这些特征难以推广到其他情境。不良事件调查的首要任务必须是为系统的设计提供信息,帮助临床医生实时有效地适应和应对设计、性能和环境的不理想组合。RCA 可以为临床工作场所的临床医生提供机会,反思当地的障碍,并确定安全可靠结果的促进因素。

相似文献

1
Making sense of root cause analysis investigations of surgery-related adverse events.理解手术相关不良事件根本原因分析调查。
Surg Clin North Am. 2012 Feb;92(1):101-15. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2011.12.008.
2
Can simulation improve the traditional method of root cause analysis: a preliminary investigation.模拟能否改进传统的根本原因分析方法:初步调查。
Surgery. 2012 Sep;152(3):489-97. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2012.07.029.
3
Adverse events: root causes and latent factors.不良事件:根本原因和潜在因素。
Surg Clin North Am. 2012 Feb;92(1):89-100. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2011.12.003.
4
[The experience of the Root Cause Analysis (RCA) regarding the adverse event "missing sample from the patient source"].[关于不良事件“患者源样本缺失”的根本原因分析(RCA)经验]
Prof Inferm. 2011 Jul-Sep;64(3):131-6.
5
Surgical adverse events, risk management, and malpractice outcome: morbidity and mortality review is not enough.手术不良事件、风险管理与医疗事故结果:发病率和死亡率审查是不够的。
Ann Surg. 2003 Jun;237(6):844-51; discussion 851-2. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000072267.19263.26.
6
Incorrect surgical procedures within and outside of the operating room: a follow-up report.手术室内外的错误手术操作:一份随访报告。
Arch Surg. 2011 Nov;146(11):1235-9. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2011.171. Epub 2011 Jul 18.
7
Root cause analysis of critical events in neurosurgery, New South Wales.新南威尔士州神经外科危急事件的根本原因分析
ANZ J Surg. 2015 Sep;85(9):626-30. doi: 10.1111/ans.12934. Epub 2015 Jan 12.
8
Incorrect surgical procedures within and outside of the operating room.手术室内外不正确的外科手术程序。
Arch Surg. 2009 Nov;144(11):1028-34. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.126.
9
Improving RCA performance: the Cornerstone Award and the power of positive reinforcement.提高 RCA 绩效:基石奖与正向激励的力量。
BMJ Qual Saf. 2011 Nov;20(11):974-82. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs.2010.049585. Epub 2011 Jul 20.
10
Development of an online morbidity, mortality, and near-miss reporting system to identify patterns of adverse events in surgical patients.开发一个在线发病率、死亡率和险些发生的事件报告系统,以识别外科手术患者不良事件的模式。
Arch Surg. 2009 Apr;144(4):305-11; discussion 311. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.2009.5.

引用本文的文献

1
Barriers and Enablers to Using a Mobile App-Based Clinical Decision Support System in Managing Perioperative Adverse Events Among Anesthesia Providers: Cross-Sectional Survey in China.麻醉医护人员使用基于移动应用程序的临床决策支持系统管理围手术期不良事件的障碍与促进因素:中国横断面调查
J Med Internet Res. 2025 May 13;27:e60304. doi: 10.2196/60304.
2
Frontline nursing staff's perceptions of intravenous medication administration: the first step toward safer infusion processes-a qualitative study.一线护理人员对静脉药物给药的看法:迈向更安全输液流程的第一步——一项定性研究。
BMJ Open Qual. 2024 Jun 27;13(2):e002809. doi: 10.1136/bmjoq-2024-002809.
3
Associations between work satisfaction, engagement and 7-day patient mortality: a cross-sectional survey.
工作满意度、投入度与 7 天内患者死亡率之间的关联:一项横断面调查。
BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 15;9(12):e031704. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031704.
4
Learning from an Unsuccessful Study Idea: Reflection and Application of Innovative Techniques to Prevent Future Failures.从一个不成功的研究思路中学习:反思和应用创新技术以防止未来失败。
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Apr;141(4):1056-1062. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000004246.
5
Night shifts, human factors, and errors in the ICU: a causal pathway?
Intensive Care Med. 2016 Mar;42(3):456-457. doi: 10.1007/s00134-015-4170-x. Epub 2015 Dec 7.
6
Clinical sensemaking: a systematic approach to reduce the impact of normalised deviance in the medical profession.临床意义建构:一种减少医学专业中常态化偏差影响的系统方法。
J R Soc Med. 2013 Oct;106(10):387-90. doi: 10.1177/0141076813505045.