Suppr超能文献

坐姿或站姿骨盆对追尾碰撞中假人响应的影响。

Influence of standing or seated pelvis on dummy responses in rear impacts.

机构信息

ProBiomechanics LLC, 265 Warrington Rd., Bloomfield Hills, MI 48304, USA.

出版信息

Accid Anal Prev. 2012 Mar;45:423-31. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2011.08.009. Epub 2011 Nov 21.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

There is a question whether the standing or seated pelvis should be used in Hybrid III dummy evaluations of seats and belt restraint systems in severe rear impacts. This study compares the standing and seated Hybrid III pelvis in matched rear sled tests.

METHODS

Sixteen sled tests were found at 10, 16 and 24 km/h rear delta V in Ford's archives where matched tests were run with the standing and seated pelvis in a belted Hybrid III dummy. Two new tests were conducted at 40 km/h rear delta V to extend the severity range. The head, chest and pelvis were instrumented with triaxial accelerometers and the upper and lower neck, thoracic spine and lumbar spine had transducers measuring triaxial loads and moments. Belt Loads were measured. High-speed video recorded different views of the dummy motion. Dummy kinematics and biomechanical responses were compared for all of the data with the two different Hybrid III pelvic designs.

RESULTS

In the 40 km/h sled tests, the dummy motion and excursion were essentially similar with the standing and seated pelvis. The similarities included the lap belt interaction with the pelvis and the leg movement upward flexing the hip joint. Overall, similar biomechanic and kinematic responses were found, including the pelvic acceleration, spinal forces and moments. For the lower speed tests at 10, 16 and 24 km/h, the motion sequence was also similar with the two different pelvises, including the upward movement of the legs as the seat was loaded and rebound kinematics. The biomechanical responses were similar. The seated pelvis involves only a small portion of the upper leg molded into the vinyl skin of the pelvis and does not limit leg rotation at the hip joint. Furthermore, lap belt loads were minimal during the rearward movement of the dummy.

CONCLUSIONS

The matched testing showed no significant difference in occupant kinematics or biomechanical responses between the standing and seated pelvis in rear sled tests. The Hybrid III dummy with the seated pelvis is suitable for FMVSS 301 and other testing of seats and belt restraint systems in severe rear impacts.

摘要

目的

在严重追尾碰撞中,关于座椅和安全带约束系统的 Hybrid III 假人评估,使用站立或坐姿骨盆是否更合适存在疑问。本研究比较了匹配后向滑橇试验中站立和坐姿 Hybrid III 骨盆。

方法

在福特档案中发现了 16 个在 10、16 和 24km/h 后 delta-V 的后向滑橇试验,其中使用配备安全带的 Hybrid III 假人进行了站立和坐姿骨盆的匹配试验。为了扩展严重程度范围,又进行了两次新的 40km/h 后向 delta-V 试验。头部、胸部和骨盆都配备了三轴加速度计,上颈、胸椎和下腰椎都配备了测量三轴力和力矩的传感器。测量了安全带载荷。高速视频记录了假人运动的不同视图。用两种不同的 Hybrid III 骨盆设计比较了所有数据的假人运动学和生物力学响应。

结果

在 40km/h 的滑橇试验中,站立和坐姿骨盆的假人运动和位移基本相似。相似之处包括安全带与骨盆的相互作用以及腿部向上弯曲髋关节的运动。总体而言,发现了相似的生物力学和运动学响应,包括骨盆加速度、脊柱力和力矩。对于较低速度的 10、16 和 24km/h 试验,两种不同骨盆的运动顺序也相似,包括座椅加载时腿部向上运动和反弹运动学。生物力学响应也相似。坐姿骨盆仅涉及一小部分大腿模压在骨盆的乙烯基皮肤内,不会限制髋关节处的腿部旋转。此外,在假人向后运动期间,安全带载荷最小。

结论

匹配试验表明,在严重追尾碰撞中,后向滑橇试验中站立和坐姿骨盆的乘员运动学或生物力学响应没有显著差异。Hybrid III 假人坐姿骨盆适用于 FMVSS 301 及其他严重追尾碰撞中座椅和安全带约束系统的测试。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验