• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种视野分析仪(Octopus 300 和 Topcon SBP-3000)的全球指数和测试时间比较。

Comparison of global indices and test duration between two visual field analyzers: Octopus 300 and Topcon SBP-3000.

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Huercal Overa Hospital, Almeria, Spain.

出版信息

Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012 Sep;250(9):1347-51. doi: 10.1007/s00417-012-1929-4. Epub 2012 Jan 25.

DOI:10.1007/s00417-012-1929-4
PMID:22270219
Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare the global indices and test duration as measured by Octopus 300 and Topcon SBP-3000 perimeters. To our knowledge, this is the first study performed in this way.

METHODS

Eighty eyes of 40 glaucomatous and ocular hypertensive patients with previous perimetric experience had visual field tests with Octopus 300 (TOP strategy) and TOPCON SBP-3000. All pairs of tests were performed randomly on separate days, but within 1 month of each other. Taking into account reliability factors of both perimetric examinations, 54 eyes of thirty patients were eligible. Only one eye from each patient was considered. Mean sensitivity (MS), mean defect (MD), loss of variance (sLV-Octopus- and LV -Topcon-) and test duration times were considered.

RESULTS

A significant difference was found between the global indices and duration times of the Octopus and the Topcon perimeters (p < 0.05; Wilcoxon test). Moderate degrees of correlation were obtained for MS (Spearman's rho = 0.635; p < 0.001) and MD (Spearman's rho = 0.592; p = 0.001) measurements. There was no correlation between sLV and LV (Spearman's rho = 0.181; p = 0.337). Agreements between pairs of global indices were low as measured by concordance correlation coefficient.

CONCLUSION

Global indices measured by the Octopus and Topcon perimeters are significantly different, so direct comparison of the measured values is not reliable. Because of the poor association and agreement between values obtained by these two perimeters, indirect comparison is also inadvisable.

摘要

目的

比较 Octopus 300 和 Topcon SBP-3000 两款视野计的全球指数和测试时间。据我们所知,这是首次以这种方式进行的研究。

方法

对 40 名有视野检查经验的青光眼和高眼压患者的 80 只眼进行了视野检查,使用了 Octopus 300(TOP 策略)和 Topcon SBP-3000。所有对测试均在不同的日子里随机进行,但彼此之间相隔不超过 1 个月。考虑到两种视野计检查的可靠性因素,有 30 名患者的 54 只眼符合条件。每位患者只考虑一只眼。考虑了平均敏感性(MS)、平均缺损(MD)、方差损失(Octopus 和 Topcon 的 sLV-)和测试时间。

结果

Octopus 和 Topcon 视野计的全球指数和测试时间存在显著差异(p<0.05;Wilcoxon 检验)。MS(Spearman rho=0.635;p<0.001)和 MD(Spearman rho=0.592;p=0.001)的测量结果具有中度相关性。sLV 和 LV 之间没有相关性(Spearman rho=0.181;p=0.337)。通过一致性相关系数测量,全球指数之间的一致性较低。

结论

Octopus 和 Topcon 视野计测量的全球指数有显著差异,因此直接比较测量值是不可靠的。由于这两种视野计获得的值之间关联和一致性较差,间接比较也不可取。

相似文献

1
Comparison of global indices and test duration between two visual field analyzers: Octopus 300 and Topcon SBP-3000.两种视野分析仪(Octopus 300 和 Topcon SBP-3000)的全球指数和测试时间比较。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2012 Sep;250(9):1347-51. doi: 10.1007/s00417-012-1929-4. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
2
Frequency doubling technique in patients with ocular hypertension and glaucoma: correlation with octopus perimeter indices.高眼压症和青光眼患者的倍频技术:与Octopus视野指数的相关性
Ophthalmology. 2000 Feb;107(2):288-94. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(99)00058-5.
3
Comparison of two fast strategies, SITA Fast and TOP, for the assessment of visual fields in glaucoma patients.青光眼患者视野评估的两种快速策略(SITA快速策略和TOP策略)的比较。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002 Jun;240(6):481-7. doi: 10.1007/s00417-002-0482-y. Epub 2002 May 15.
4
Quantification and Predictors of Visual Field Variability in Healthy, Glaucoma Suspect, and Glaucomatous Eyes Using SITA-Faster.使用SITA-Faster技术对健康眼睛、青光眼疑似患者眼睛和青光眼患者眼睛的视野变异性进行量化及预测因素分析
Ophthalmology. 2024 Jun;131(6):658-666. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.12.018. Epub 2023 Dec 16.
5
Detection of early glaucomatous progression with octopus cluster trend analysis.利用Octopus聚类趋势分析检测早期青光眼进展
J Glaucoma. 2014 Jun-Jul;23(5):269-75. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3182741c69.
6
Correlation between ocular pulse amplitude measured by dynamic contour tonometer and visual field defects.动态轮廓眼压计测量的眼动脉搏动幅度与视野缺损之间的相关性。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2008 Apr;246(4):559-65. doi: 10.1007/s00417-007-0706-2. Epub 2008 Jan 12.
7
Comparison of matrix perimetry with octopus perimetry for assessing glaucomatous visual field defects.比较矩阵视野计和奥拓视野计评估青光眼视野缺损。
J Glaucoma. 2011 Feb;20(2):126-32. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181d786dd.
8
Correlation between high-pass resolution perimetry and standard threshold perimetry in subjects with glaucoma and ocular hypertension.青光眼和高眼压症患者高通分辨率视野检查与标准阈值视野检查之间的相关性
Int Ophthalmol. 1999;23(2):99-103. doi: 10.1023/a:1026573909370.
9
Ability of 24-2C and 24-2 Grids to Identify Central Visual Field Defects and Structure-Function Concordance in Glaucoma and Suspects.24-2C 和 24-2 网格在青光眼和疑似患者中识别中央视野缺损和结构-功能一致性的能力。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2020 Nov;219:317-331. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.06.024. Epub 2020 Jul 2.
10
Learning effect and test-retest variability of pulsar perimetry.脉冲星视野计的学习效应和复测变异性。
J Glaucoma. 2013 Mar;22(3):230-7. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e318237bfe7.

引用本文的文献

1
On the protective role of the blood vessels in glaucomatous damage: A transversal study.关于血管在青光眼性损害中的保护作用:一项横向研究。
J Optom. 2023 Jan-Mar;16(1):81-87. doi: 10.1016/j.optom.2021.10.003. Epub 2021 Dec 20.
2
Periphery kinetic perimetry: clinically feasible to complement central static perimetry.周边视野动力学检查:在临床上可行,可作为中心静态视野检查的补充。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep 23;21(1):343. doi: 10.1186/s12886-021-02056-5.
3
Characteristics of central visual field defect after macular hole surgery.黄斑裂孔手术后中心视野缺损的特征

本文引用的文献

1
A comparison of global indices between the Medmont Automated Perimeter and the Humphrey Field Analyzer.Medmont自动视野计与Humphrey视野分析仪的整体指标比较。
Br J Ophthalmol. 2007 Oct;91(10):1285-7. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2007.114926. Epub 2007 Mar 27.
2
Comparison of two fast strategies, SITA Fast and TOP, for the assessment of visual fields in glaucoma patients.青光眼患者视野评估的两种快速策略(SITA快速策略和TOP策略)的比较。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2002 Jun;240(6):481-7. doi: 10.1007/s00417-002-0482-y. Epub 2002 May 15.
3
Conversion formulas between automated-perimetry indexes as measured by two different types of instrument.
Int J Ophthalmol. 2019 Mar 18;12(3):451-456. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2019.03.16. eCollection 2019.
Ophthalmologica. 2001 Mar-Apr;215(2):87-90. doi: 10.1159/000050835.
4
Influence of the "fatigue effect" on the mean deviation measurement in perimetry.
Eur J Ophthalmol. 1997 Jan-Mar;7(1):29-34. doi: 10.1177/112067219700700106.
5
The effect of perimetric experience in patients with glaucoma.视野检查经验对青光眼患者的影响。
Arch Ophthalmol. 1996 Jan;114(1):19-22. doi: 10.1001/archopht.1996.01100130017003.
6
Formulas for conversion between Octopus and Humphrey threshold values and indices.
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1995 Oct;233(10):627-34. doi: 10.1007/BF00185283.
7
Evaluation of FASTPAC, a new strategy for threshold estimation with the Humphrey Field Analyzer, in a glaucomatous population.
Ophthalmology. 1993 Jun;100(6):949-54. doi: 10.1016/s0161-6420(13)31551-6.
8
Static threshold visual field in glaucoma with the Fastpac algorithm of the Humphrey Field Analyser. Is the gain in examination time offset by any loss of information?
Eur J Ophthalmol. 1994 Apr-Jun;4(2):105-10. doi: 10.1177/112067219400400205.
9
Evaluation of the Humphrey FASTPAC threshold program in glaucoma.青光眼患者中 Humphrey FASTPAC 阈值程序的评估
Br J Ophthalmol. 1994 Jul;78(7):516-9. doi: 10.1136/bjo.78.7.516.
10
Glaucomatous visual fields. FASTPAC versus full threshold strategy of the Humphrey Field Analyzer.青光眼视野。Humphrey视野分析仪的FASTPAC与全阈值策略
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 1995 Jun;36(7):1390-7.