Division of Infectious Disease, Department of Pediatrics and Medical Microbiology, The Montreal Children's Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, Que.
CMAJ. 2012 Mar 6;184(4):E232-9. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.110372. Epub 2012 Jan 23.
The risk of infection following a visit to the emergency department is unknown. We explored this risk among elderly residents of long-term care facilities.
We compared the rates of new respiratory and gastrointestinal infections among elderly residents aged 65 years and older of 22 long-term care facilities. We used standardized surveillance definitions. For each resident who visited the emergency department during the study period, we randomly selected two residents who did not visit the emergency department and matched them by facility unit, age and sex. We calculated the rates and proportions of new infections, and we used conditional logistic regression to adjust for potential confounding variables.
In total, we included 1269 residents of long-term care facilities, including 424 who visited the emergency department during the study. The baseline characteristics of residents who did or did not visit the emergency department were similar, except for underlying health status (visited the emergency department: mean Charlson Comorbidity Index 6.1, standard deviation [SD] 2.5; did not visit the emergency department: mean Charlson Comorbidity index 5.5, SD 2.7; p < 0.001) and the proportion who had visitors (visited the emergency department: 46.9%; did not visit the emergency department: 39.2%; p = 0.01). Overall, 21 (5.0%) residents who visited the emergency department and 17 (2.0%) who did not visit the emergency department acquired new infections. The incidence of new infections was 8.3/1000 patient-days among those who visited the emergency department and 3.4/1000 patient-days among those who did not visit the emergency department. The adjusted odds ratio for the risk of infection following a visit to the emergency department was 3.9 (95% confidence interval 1.4-10.8).
A visit to the emergency department was associated with more than a threefold increased risk of acute infection among elderly people. Additional precautions should be considered for residents following a visit to the emergency department.
前往急诊部后的感染风险未知。我们在长期护理机构的老年居民中对此风险进行了研究。
我们比较了 22 家长期护理机构中年龄在 65 岁及以上的老年居民中新出现的呼吸道和胃肠道感染的发生率。我们使用了标准化的监测定义。对于研究期间去急诊部就诊的每位居民,我们随机选择了两名未去急诊部就诊的居民,并按机构单元、年龄和性别进行匹配。我们计算了新感染的发生率和比例,并使用条件逻辑回归来调整潜在的混杂变量。
共纳入了 1269 名长期护理机构居民,其中 424 名在研究期间去了急诊部。去急诊部和不去急诊部的居民的基线特征相似,除了基础健康状况(去急诊部:平均 Charlson 合并症指数 6.1,标准差 [SD] 2.5;不去急诊部:平均 Charlson 合并症指数 5.5,SD 2.7;p < 0.001)和有访客的比例(去急诊部:46.9%;不去急诊部:39.2%;p = 0.01)。总的来说,21 名(5.0%)去急诊部就诊的居民和 17 名(2.0%)不去急诊部就诊的居民新感染。去急诊部就诊的患者的新感染发生率为 8.3/1000 患者天,不去急诊部就诊的患者为 3.4/1000 患者天。急诊就诊后感染风险的调整比值比为 3.9(95%置信区间 1.4-10.8)。
去急诊部与老年人急性感染的风险增加三倍以上相关。对于去急诊部就诊的居民,应考虑采取额外的预防措施。