Agroecology, Department of Crop Sciences, Georg-August University, Grisebachstrasse 6, 37077 Göttingen, Germany.
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2012 Aug;87(3):661-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-185X.2011.00216.x. Epub 2012 Jan 24.
Understanding how landscape characteristics affect biodiversity patterns and ecological processes at local and landscape scales is critical for mitigating effects of global environmental change. In this review, we use knowledge gained from human-modified landscapes to suggest eight hypotheses, which we hope will encourage more systematic research on the role of landscape composition and configuration in determining the structure of ecological communities, ecosystem functioning and services. We organize the eight hypotheses under four overarching themes. Section A: 'landscape moderation of biodiversity patterns' includes (1) the landscape species pool hypothesis-the size of the landscape-wide species pool moderates local (alpha) biodiversity, and (2) the dominance of beta diversity hypothesis-landscape-moderated dissimilarity of local communities determines landscape-wide biodiversity and overrides negative local effects of habitat fragmentation on biodiversity. Section B: 'landscape moderation of population dynamics' includes (3) the cross-habitat spillover hypothesis-landscape-moderated spillover of energy, resources and organisms across habitats, including between managed and natural ecosystems, influences landscape-wide community structure and associated processes and (4) the landscape-moderated concentration and dilution hypothesis-spatial and temporal changes in landscape composition can cause transient concentration or dilution of populations with functional consequences. Section C: 'landscape moderation of functional trait selection' includes (5) the landscape-moderated functional trait selection hypothesis-landscape moderation of species trait selection shapes the functional role and trajectory of community assembly, and (6) the landscape-moderated insurance hypothesis-landscape complexity provides spatial and temporal insurance, i.e. high resilience and stability of ecological processes in changing environments. Section D: 'landscape constraints on conservation management' includes (7) the intermediate landscape-complexity hypothesis-landscape-moderated effectiveness of local conservation management is highest in structurally simple, rather than in cleared (i.e. extremely simplified) or in complex landscapes, and (8) the landscape-moderated biodiversity versus ecosystem service management hypothesis-landscape-moderated biodiversity conservation to optimize functional diversity and related ecosystem services will not protect endangered species. Shifting our research focus from local to landscape-moderated effects on biodiversity will be critical to developing solutions for future biodiversity and ecosystem service management.
了解景观特征如何在局部和景观尺度上影响生物多样性格局和生态过程,对于缓解全球环境变化的影响至关重要。在这篇综述中,我们利用人类改造景观的知识提出了八个假说,希望这些假说能够鼓励对景观组成和配置在确定生态群落结构、生态系统功能和服务方面的作用进行更系统的研究。我们将这八个假说组织成四个主题。A 节:“景观对生物多样性格局的调节”包括(1)景观物种库假说——景观范围内物种库的大小调节局部(α)生物多样性,以及(2)β多样性主导假说——景观调节的局地群落之间的差异决定景观范围内的生物多样性,并超过生境破碎化对生物多样性的负面影响。B 节:“景观对种群动态的调节”包括(3)跨生境溢出假说——景观调节能量、资源和生物在生境之间的溢出,包括管理和自然生态系统之间的溢出,影响景观范围内的群落结构和相关过程,以及(4)景观调节的集中和稀释假说——景观组成的时空变化可能导致具有功能后果的种群暂时集中或稀释。C 节:“景观对功能特征选择的调节”包括(5)景观调节的功能特征选择假说——景观调节的物种特征选择塑造了群落组装的功能角色和轨迹,以及(6)景观调节的保险假说——景观复杂性提供了时空保险,即在不断变化的环境中,生态过程具有高弹性和稳定性。D 节:“景观对保护管理的限制”包括(7)中间景观复杂性假说——在结构简单而不是清除(即极度简化)或复杂的景观中,景观调节的局部保护管理效果最高,以及(8)景观调节的生物多样性与生态系统服务管理假说——景观调节的生物多样性保护以优化功能多样性和相关生态系统服务,将无法保护濒危物种。将我们的研究重点从局部转移到景观调节对生物多样性的影响,对于制定未来生物多样性和生态系统服务管理的解决方案至关重要。