Suppr超能文献

确定与慢性下背痛长期病假员工重返工作相关的评估因素:一项焦点小组研究。

Identifying factors relevant in the assessment of return-to-work efforts in employees on long-term sickness absence due to chronic low back pain: a focus group study.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, Community and Occupational Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2012 Jan 24;12:77. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-77.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Efforts undertaken during the return to work (RTW) process need to be sufficient to prevent unnecessary applications for disability benefits. The purpose of this study was to identify factors relevant to RTW Effort Sufficiency (RTW-ES) in cases of sick-listed employees with chronic low back pain (CLBP).

METHODS

Using focus groups consisting of Labor Experts (LE's) working at the Dutch Social Insurance Institute, arguments and underlying grounds relevant to the assessment of RTW-ES were investigated. Factors were collected and categorized using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF model).

RESULTS

Two focus groups yielded 19 factors, of which 12 are categorized in the ICF model under activities (e.g. functional capacity) and in the personal (e.g. age, tenure) and environmental domain (e.g. employer-employee relationship). The remaining 7 factors are categorized under intervention, job accommodation and measures.

CONCLUSIONS

This focus group study shows that 19 factors may be relevant to RTW-ES in sick-listed employees with CLBP. Providing these results to professionals assessing RTW-ES might contribute to a more transparent and systematic approach. Considering the importance of the quality of the RTW process, optimizing the RTW-ES assessment is essential.

摘要

背景

重返工作岗位(RTW)过程中所做的努力必须足以防止不必要的残疾福利申请。本研究的目的是确定与慢性下背痛(CLBP)列病假员工的 RTW 努力充足性(RTW-ES)相关的因素。

方法

使用由荷兰社会保险协会的劳动专家(LE)组成的焦点小组,研究了与 RTW-ES 评估相关的论点和基本依据。使用国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF 模型)收集和分类因素。

结果

两个焦点小组产生了 19 个因素,其中 12 个在 ICF 模型中归类为活动(如功能能力)和个人(如年龄、任期)和环境领域(如雇主-员工关系)。其余 7 个因素归类于干预、工作适应和措施。

结论

这项焦点小组研究表明,19 个因素可能与 CLBP 列病假员工的 RTW-ES 相关。向评估 RTW-ES 的专业人员提供这些结果可能有助于采用更透明和系统的方法。考虑到 RTW 过程的质量很重要,优化 RTW-ES 评估至关重要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/48e3/3307027/5732463c828b/1471-2458-12-77-1.jpg

相似文献

3
Influence of efforts of employer and employee on return-to-work process and outcomes.
J Occup Rehabil. 2011 Dec;21(4):513-9. doi: 10.1007/s10926-011-9293-5.
4
Return-to-Work Self-Efficacy and Actual Return to Work Among Long-Term Sick-Listed Employees.
J Occup Rehabil. 2015 Jun;25(2):423-31. doi: 10.1007/s10926-014-9552-3.
8
Self-directing return-to-work: Employees' perspective.
Work. 2019;64(4):797-807. doi: 10.3233/WOR-193041.
9
What factors are most relevant to the assessment of work ability of employees on long-term sick leave? The physicians' perspective.
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2013 Jul;86(5):509-18. doi: 10.1007/s00420-012-0783-3. Epub 2012 May 24.
10
Work Characteristics and Return to Work in Long-Term Sick-Listed Employees with Depressive Symptoms.
J Occup Rehabil. 2017 Dec;27(4):612-622. doi: 10.1007/s10926-017-9696-z.

本文引用的文献

1
Influence of efforts of employer and employee on return-to-work process and outcomes.
J Occup Rehabil. 2011 Dec;21(4):513-9. doi: 10.1007/s10926-011-9293-5.
2
The trend in total cost of back pain in The Netherlands in the period 2002 to 2007.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Jun;36(13):1050-8. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e70488.
3
The assessment of efforts to return to work in the European Union.
Eur J Public Health. 2010 Dec;20(6):689-94. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckp244. Epub 2010 Feb 8.
4
Researcher perspectives on competencies of return-to-work coordinators.
Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(1):72-8. doi: 10.3109/09638280903195278.
7
Medico-legal reasoning in disability assessment: a focus group and validation study.
BMC Public Health. 2008 Sep 25;8:335. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-335.
8
Who's in charge? Challenges in evaluating quality of primary care treatment for low back pain.
J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Dec;14(6):961-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2007.00890.x. Epub 2008 Mar 24.
9
Measuring return to work.
J Occup Rehabil. 2007 Dec;17(4):766-81. doi: 10.1007/s10926-007-9101-4. Epub 2007 Oct 11.
10
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042. Epub 2007 Sep 14.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验