• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

探讨与评估因抑郁障碍而长期病假的员工重返工作岗位过程相关的因素:一项焦点小组研究。

Exploring factors relevant in the assessment of the return-to-work process of employees on long-term sickness absence due to a depressive disorder: a focus group study.

机构信息

Department of Health Sciences, Community and Occupational Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2012 Feb 6;12:103. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-103.

DOI:10.1186/1471-2458-12-103
PMID:22309700
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3293063/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Efforts undertaken during the Return-to-Work (RTW) process need to be sufficient in order to optimize the quality of the RTW process. The purpose of this study was to explore factors relevant to Return-to-Work Effort Sufficiency (RTW-ES) in cases of sick-listed employees with a Depressive Disorder (DD).

METHOD

A case of a long-term sick-listed employee with a DD applying for disability benefits was used to gather arguments and grounds relevant to the assessment of RTW-ES. Two focus group meetings were held, consisting of Labor Experts working at the Dutch Social Insurance Institute. Factors were collected and categorized using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF model).

RESULTS

Sixteen factors relevant to RTW-ES assessment in a case of DD were found, categorized in the ICF-model under activities (e.g. functional capacity), personal (e.g. competencies, attitude) and environmental domain (e.g. employer-employee relationship), or categorized under interventions, job accommodations and measures.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that 16 factors are relevant in the assessment of RTW-ES in employees sick-listed due to DD. Further research is necessary to expand this knowledge to other health conditions, and to investigate the impact of these results on the quality of the RTW-ES assessment.

摘要

背景

为了优化重返工作岗位(RTW)的质量,在 RTW 过程中所付出的努力必须是充分的。本研究的目的是探讨与抑郁障碍(DD)患者的重返工作岗位努力充足性(RTW-ES)相关的因素。

方法

使用一个长期请病假且患有 DD 的员工申请残疾津贴的案例来收集与评估 RTW-ES 相关的论据和依据。进行了两次焦点小组会议,参与者为荷兰社会保险研究所的劳动专家。使用国际功能、残疾和健康分类(ICF 模型)收集和分类因素。

结果

在 DD 病例中发现了 16 个与 RTW-ES 评估相关的因素,这些因素被归类在 ICF 模型的活动(例如:功能能力)、个人(例如:能力、态度)和环境领域(例如:雇主-员工关系)下,或者归类在干预措施、工作调整和措施下。

结论

本研究表明,在评估因 DD 请病假的员工的 RTW-ES 时,有 16 个因素是相关的。需要进一步的研究来将这些知识扩展到其他健康状况,并研究这些结果对 RTW-ES 评估质量的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c54/3293063/6b4d9f993fb8/1471-2458-12-103-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c54/3293063/6b4d9f993fb8/1471-2458-12-103-1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5c54/3293063/6b4d9f993fb8/1471-2458-12-103-1.jpg

相似文献

1
Exploring factors relevant in the assessment of the return-to-work process of employees on long-term sickness absence due to a depressive disorder: a focus group study.探讨与评估因抑郁障碍而长期病假的员工重返工作岗位过程相关的因素:一项焦点小组研究。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Feb 6;12:103. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-103.
2
Identifying factors relevant in the assessment of return-to-work efforts in employees on long-term sickness absence due to chronic low back pain: a focus group study.确定与慢性下背痛长期病假员工重返工作相关的评估因素:一项焦点小组研究。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jan 24;12:77. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-77.
3
Influence of efforts of employer and employee on return-to-work process and outcomes.雇主和雇员努力对重返工作过程和结果的影响。
J Occup Rehabil. 2011 Dec;21(4):513-9. doi: 10.1007/s10926-011-9293-5.
4
Effectiveness of a blended web-based intervention on return to work for sick-listed employees with common mental disorders: results of a cluster randomized controlled trial.基于网络的综合干预措施对患有常见精神障碍的病假员工重返工作岗位的有效性:一项整群随机对照试验的结果
J Med Internet Res. 2015 May 13;17(5):e116. doi: 10.2196/jmir.4097.
5
Return-to-Work Self-Efficacy and Actual Return to Work Among Long-Term Sick-Listed Employees.长期病假员工的复工自我效能感与实际复工情况
J Occup Rehabil. 2015 Jun;25(2):423-31. doi: 10.1007/s10926-014-9552-3.
6
Work Characteristics and Return to Work in Long-Term Sick-Listed Employees with Depressive Symptoms.工作特征与抑郁症状长期请病假员工的重返工作岗位。
J Occup Rehabil. 2017 Dec;27(4):612-622. doi: 10.1007/s10926-017-9696-z.
7
What factors are most relevant to the assessment of work ability of employees on long-term sick leave? The physicians' perspective.哪些因素与评估长期请病假员工的工作能力最相关?医生的观点。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2013 Jul;86(5):509-18. doi: 10.1007/s00420-012-0783-3. Epub 2012 May 24.
8
Self-directing return-to-work: Employees' perspective.自主重返工作岗位:员工视角。
Work. 2019;64(4):797-807. doi: 10.3233/WOR-193041.
9
Intervention mapping for development of a participatory return-to-work intervention for temporary agency workers and unemployed workers sick-listed due to musculoskeletal disorders.针对因肌肉骨骼疾病而被列入病假名单的临时机构工人和失业工人,制定参与式重返工作岗位干预措施的干预映射。
BMC Public Health. 2009 Jul 2;9:216. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-9-216.
10
Environmental and personal factors that support early return-to-work: a qualitative study using the ICF as a framework.支持早期重返工作岗位的环境和个人因素:一项以国际功能、残疾和健康分类为框架的定性研究
Work. 2014;48(2):203-15. doi: 10.3233/WOR-131657.

引用本文的文献

1
The Mediating Role of Recovery Expectancies on the Relation Between Depression and Return-to-Work.康复预期在抑郁症与重返工作岗位关系中的中介作用。
J Occup Rehabil. 2015 Jun;25(2):348-56. doi: 10.1007/s10926-014-9543-4.
2
Physical functioning after occupational rehabilitation and returning to work among employees with chronic musculoskeletal pain and comorbid depressive symptoms.职业康复和重返工作岗位后慢性肌肉骨骼疼痛和合并抑郁症状员工的身体功能。
J Multidiscip Healthc. 2014 Jan 23;7:55-63. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S55828. eCollection 2014.
3
Obstacles to and facilitators of return to work after work-disabling back pain: the workers' perspective.

本文引用的文献

1
Identifying factors relevant in the assessment of return-to-work efforts in employees on long-term sickness absence due to chronic low back pain: a focus group study.确定与慢性下背痛长期病假员工重返工作相关的评估因素:一项焦点小组研究。
BMC Public Health. 2012 Jan 24;12:77. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-77.
2
Influence of efforts of employer and employee on return-to-work process and outcomes.雇主和雇员努力对重返工作过程和结果的影响。
J Occup Rehabil. 2011 Dec;21(4):513-9. doi: 10.1007/s10926-011-9293-5.
3
The assessment of efforts to return to work in the European Union.
工作致残性腰痛后重返工作的障碍和促进因素:工人的观点。
J Occup Rehabil. 2013 Jun;23(2):280-9. doi: 10.1007/s10926-012-9399-4.
欧盟重返工作岗位努力评估。
Eur J Public Health. 2010 Dec;20(6):689-94. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckp244. Epub 2010 Feb 8.
4
Implications of long-term conditions for both mental and physical health: comparison of rheumatoid arthritis and schizophrenia.长期病症对身心健康的影响:类风湿性关节炎与精神分裂症的比较
Qual Life Res. 2009 Aug;18(6):699-707. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9486-y. Epub 2009 May 10.
5
Behavioral determinants as predictors of return to work after long-term sickness absence: an application of the theory of planned behavior.行为决定因素作为长期病假后重返工作岗位的预测指标:计划行为理论的应用
J Occup Rehabil. 2009 Jun;19(2):166-74. doi: 10.1007/s10926-009-9172-5. Epub 2009 Mar 31.
6
Medico-legal reasoning in disability assessment: a focus group and validation study.残疾评估中的法医学推理:一项焦点小组研究与验证研究
BMC Public Health. 2008 Sep 25;8:335. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-8-335.
7
Comparison of disability and quality of life measures in patients with long-term psychotic disorders and patients with multiple sclerosis: an application of the WHO Disability Assessment Schedule II and WHO Quality of Life-BREF.长期精神疾病患者与多发性硬化症患者的残疾状况及生活质量测量比较:世界卫生组织残疾评定量表第二版及世界卫生组织生活质量简表的应用
Int J Rehabil Res. 2008 Jun;31(2):141-9. doi: 10.1097/MRR.0b013e32830150e6.
8
Interventions to improve occupational health in depressed people.改善抑郁症患者职业健康的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16(2):CD006237. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006237.pub2.
9
What does research tell us about depression, job performance, and work productivity?关于抑郁症、工作表现和工作效率,研究告诉了我们什么?
J Occup Environ Med. 2008 Apr;50(4):401-10. doi: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31816bae50.
10
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups.定性研究报告的统一标准(COREQ):访谈和焦点小组的32项清单
Int J Qual Health Care. 2007 Dec;19(6):349-57. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzm042. Epub 2007 Sep 14.