1 AHP Research, Uxbridge, UK 2 University of the West of Scotland, Paisley, UK.
Patient. 2008 Jul 1;1(3):151-63. doi: 10.2165/1312067-200801030-00002.
Alcoholism has the potential to impact on the quality of life (QOL) of an 'alcoholic,' their family, and friends in both the short and long term. Consequently, increasing significance has been placed on understanding health issues from the patient's perspective, evaluating the patient's subjective experience of his/her symptoms (as well as any treatment), and the impact of these on his/her QOL.The objective of this review was to identify and evaluate the content validity of measures used to assess health-related QOL (HR-QOL) in alcoholism (alcohol abuse and alcohol dependence).Systematic searches of Scopus (1990-2007) were conducted using terms synonymous with alcoholism combined with terms associated with measuring HR-QOL. A total of 618 abstracts were identified, detailing the use of 16 generic patient-reported outcome measures to assess HR-QOL in alcoholism. Upon further examination of item content, seven measured generic health status and nine assessed generic QOL or life satisfaction (with varying definitional criteria and domain focus).The SF-36 and EQ-5D, in particular, have been used widely, but were misinterpreted frequently as measures of HR-QOL rather than health status. One alcohol-specific measure was identified: the AlQoL 9, a scale that some have claimed to epitomize alcohol-related QOL. However, the AlQoL 9 was developed by reducing the SF-36 (French version) to the nine items most relevant to alcoholism. The methodology for determining the relevance of the existing items of the SF-36 was comprehensive but the adapted measure does not include assessment of additional concepts (such as sleep and social isolation) of particular importance for alcohol-related QOL.There is a lack of research and assessment of HR-QOL in alcoholism and alcohol abuse, and our assessment of the content validity of existing measures used to date suggests that many are likely to be inadequate. Given the insufficiencies of generic measures and the limited applicability of the AlQoL 9, there is a need for an alcoholism-specific QOL measure that focuses on the domains that are most salient to people with such problems. Individuals need to be given the opportunity to determine the extent to which their QOL is impaired by alcoholism based upon their own criteria for what constitutes good HR-QOL. Only then will we be able to assess the full impact of alcoholism (and its treatment) on QOL.
酗酒可能会在短期和长期内影响酗酒者的生活质量 (QOL)、他们的家人和朋友。因此,人们越来越重视从患者的角度了解健康问题,评估患者对其症状(以及任何治疗)的主观体验,以及这些对其 QOL 的影响。本综述的目的是确定和评估用于评估酗酒(酒精滥用和酒精依赖)相关健康相关生活质量 (HR-QOL) 的测量方法的内容效度。使用与酗酒同义的术语和与测量 HR-QOL 相关的术语对 Scopus(1990-2007 年)进行了系统搜索。共确定了 618 篇摘要,详细介绍了使用 16 种通用患者报告的结果措施来评估酗酒者的 HR-QOL。在进一步检查项目内容后,有七种测量通用健康状况,九种评估通用生活质量或生活满意度(具有不同的定义标准和域重点)。SF-36 和 EQ-5D 尤其被广泛使用,但经常被误解为衡量 HR-QOL 而不是健康状况的方法。确定了一种特定于酒精的措施:AlQoL 9,有人声称它代表了与酒精相关的生活质量。然而,AlQoL 9 是通过将 SF-36(法语版)简化为与酗酒最相关的九个项目而开发的。确定 SF-36 现有项目相关性的方法是全面的,但适应后的措施不包括对与酒精相关的生活质量特别重要的其他概念(如睡眠和社会隔离)的评估。目前对酗酒和酒精滥用的 HR-QOL 研究和评估不足,我们对迄今为止用于评估的现有措施的内容有效性的评估表明,许多措施可能不够充分。鉴于通用措施的不足和 AlQoL 9 的有限适用性,需要一种针对酒精的特定 QOL 措施,重点关注对有此类问题的人最相关的领域。需要让个人有机会根据自己对良好 HR-QOL 的标准来确定他们的 QOL 因酗酒而受损的程度。只有这样,我们才能评估酗酒(及其治疗)对 QOL 的全面影响。