• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

患者在门诊就诊上花费了多少时间?:美国时间使用调查。

How Much Time Do Patients Spend on Outpatient Visits?: The American Time Use Survey.

机构信息

1 Institute for Health, Health Care Policy, and Aging Research and Department of Economics, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA 2 Institute for Health, Health Care Policy, and Aging Research and Department of Sociology, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.

出版信息

Patient. 2008 Jul 1;1(3):211-22. doi: 10.2165/1312067-200801030-00008.

DOI:10.2165/1312067-200801030-00008
PMID:22272927
Abstract

BACKGROUND

In Crossing the Quality Chasm, the Institute of Medicine recommended that patient-centered care should not waste patients' time and should recognize the involvement of family and friends. Studies have documented the time spent by physicians on outpatient visits, but not that spent by patients and their companions. The patient's perspective provides an important yet overlooked indicator of healthcare effectiveness.

OBJECTIVE

To document how much time American patients spend on outpatient visits, for what purposes (travel, waiting, receiving services), and the time required of family members and friends.

METHODS

We used data from the first 4 years (2003-6) of the American Time Use Survey (ATUS), conducted by the US Census Bureau for the Bureau of Labor Statistics, which asks respondents about their activities over a 24-hour period. ATUS is a nationally representative population-based survey that samples days continuously throughout the year. In 2003-6, 60 674 respondents aged ≥15 years were randomly selected from households that completed the Current Population Survey; 1621 reported seeking medical care for themselves on their survey day. We documented the percentage of the population that reported outpatient visits, the percentage who were accompanied to those visits and by whom, and the mean time spent by patients and their companions, by type of activity, and by age and sex.

RESULTS

After weighting the data to represent the US population, we found that 3.4% of people aged ≥15 years reported traveling, waiting, or receiving services in connection with an outpatient visit on their survey day. The mean time for those who reported the activity was 35 minutes for travel (95% CI 33, 37), 42 minutes of waiting (95% CI 37, 47), and 74 minutes receiving services (95% CI 70, 79). Overall, 39.5% were accompanied, usually by family members. Companions spent a mean of 124 minutes per encounter (95% CI 112, 135). Nearly half of those aged ≥65 years were accompanied, almost always by adults only, suggesting that they may have needed help with transportation, negotiating the healthcare system, or performing cognitive and emotional tasks involved in receiving care.

CONCLUSION

Outpatient visits are time intensive for American patients and their families: the equivalent of 207 million 40-hour work-weeks each year. Patients and their families spend substantially more time on outpatient visits than the time with the physician reported by the annual National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey. Further research is needed on the components of outpatient visits that do not directly involve physicians. Efforts to improve care should address waiting times and recognize the involvement of family members. The ATUS could provide periodic benchmarks of patient time use as a supplement to other indicators of patient-centered care in the annual National Healthcare Quality Report.

摘要

背景

在《跨越质量鸿沟》中,美国医学研究所建议以患者为中心的护理不应该浪费患者的时间,并应该认识到家庭成员和朋友的参与。已经有研究记录了医生在门诊就诊时花费的时间,但没有记录患者及其同伴花费的时间。患者的视角提供了一个重要但被忽视的医疗效果指标。

目的

记录美国患者在门诊就诊时花费的时间,以及他们的就诊目的(旅行、等待、接受服务),以及家庭成员和朋友所需的时间。

方法

我们使用了美国人口普查局为劳工统计局进行的美国时间使用调查(ATUS)的前 4 年(2003-6 年)的数据,该调查要求受访者在 24 小时内报告他们的活动。ATUS 是一项基于全国代表性人口的调查,全年连续抽样。在 2003-6 年期间,从完成当前人口调查的家庭中随机选择了 60674 名年龄≥15 岁的受访者;其中 1621 名受访者在调查日报告了自己的医疗就诊。我们记录了报告门诊就诊的人口百分比、陪同就诊的人数及其身份,以及患者及其同伴按活动类型、年龄和性别划分的平均就诊时间。

结果

对数据进行加权以代表美国人口后,我们发现 3.4%的年龄≥15 岁的人在调查日报告了与门诊就诊相关的旅行、等待或接受服务。报告该活动的人的平均时间为旅行 35 分钟(95%CI 33, 37),等待 42 分钟(95%CI 37, 47),接受服务 74 分钟(95%CI 70, 79)。总体而言,39.5%的人有陪同,通常是家庭成员。同伴每次就诊平均花费 124 分钟(95%CI 112, 135)。近一半的≥65 岁的人有陪同,几乎都是成年人,这表明他们可能需要帮助进行交通、与医疗保健系统协商,或完成接受护理涉及的认知和情感任务。

结论

美国患者及其家属的门诊就诊时间非常紧张:每年相当于 2.07 亿个 40 小时的工作周。患者及其家属在门诊就诊上花费的时间远远超过了年度国家门诊医疗保健调查中报告的与医生在一起的时间。需要进一步研究门诊就诊中不直接涉及医生的部分。改善护理的努力应该解决等待时间,并认识到家庭成员的参与。ATUS 可以定期提供患者时间使用的基准,作为年度国家医疗保健质量报告中患者为中心护理的其他指标的补充。

相似文献

1
How Much Time Do Patients Spend on Outpatient Visits?: The American Time Use Survey.患者在门诊就诊上花费了多少时间?:美国时间使用调查。
Patient. 2008 Jul 1;1(3):211-22. doi: 10.2165/1312067-200801030-00008.
2
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2001 summary.国家门诊医疗护理调查:2001年总结
Adv Data. 2003 Aug 11(337):1-44.
3
Health-related activities in the American Time Use Survey.美国时间使用调查中的健康相关活动。
Med Care. 2007 Jul;45(7):680-5. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3180455782.
4
How much time do physicians spend providing care outside of office visits?医生在门诊之外提供护理的时间有多少?
Ann Intern Med. 2007 Nov 20;147(10):693-8. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-10-200711200-00005.
5
Palliative care experiences of adult cancer patients from ethnocultural groups: a qualitative systematic review protocol.不同种族文化群体成年癌症患者的姑息治疗体验:一项定性系统评价方案
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):99-111. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1809.
6
National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2005 emergency department summary.国家医院门诊医疗调查:2005年急诊科总结
Adv Data. 2007 Jun 29(386):1-32.
7
Investigating the American Time Use Survey from an exposure modeling perspective.从暴露建模的角度研究美国时间利用调查。
J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol. 2011 Jan-Feb;21(1):92-105. doi: 10.1038/jes.2009.60. Epub 2009 Dec 30.
8
Opportunity costs of ambulatory medical care in the United States.美国门诊医疗的机会成本。
Am J Manag Care. 2015 Aug;21(8):567-74.
9
A National Assessment of the Association Between Patient Race and Physician Visit Time During New Outpatient Urology Consultations.一项关于新门诊泌尿外科会诊中患者种族与医生诊疗时间之间关联的全国性评估。
Urology. 2022 Apr;162:63-69. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.06.046. Epub 2021 Aug 8.
10
Policy versus practice: comparison of prescribing therapy and durable medical equipment in medical and educational settings.政策与实践:医疗和教育环境中处方治疗与耐用医疗设备的比较
Pediatrics. 2004 Nov;114(5):e612-25. doi: 10.1542/peds.2004-1063.

引用本文的文献

1
Time Spent Engaging in Health Care Among Patients With Left Ventricular Assist Devices.左心室辅助装置患者的医疗保健参与时间。
JACC Heart Fail. 2022 May;10(5):321-332. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2022.01.011. Epub 2022 Apr 6.
2
Today's referral is tomorrow's repeat patient: referrals to and between medical outpatient clinics in a hospital.今天的转诊就是明天的复诊患者:医院门诊间的转诊与转科。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Feb 24;22(1):254. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-07633-y.
3
Preferences for Alternative Care Modalities Among French Adults With Chronic Illness.

本文引用的文献

1
The role of the patient in promoting patient-centered outcomes research.患者在推动以患者为中心的结局研究中的作用。
Patient. 2008 Jan 1;1(1):1-3. doi: 10.2165/01312067-200801010-00001.
2
Hidden in plain sight: medical visit companions as a resource for vulnerable older adults.显而易见却易被忽视:医疗探访陪伴者作为弱势老年人的一种资源
Arch Intern Med. 2008 Jul 14;168(13):1409-15. doi: 10.1001/archinte.168.13.1409.
3
Value of patient time invested in the colonoscopy screening process: time requirements for colonoscopy study.患者投入结肠镜检查筛查过程中的时间价值:结肠镜检查研究的时间要求
法国慢性病成年患者对替代护理模式的偏好
JAMA Netw Open. 2021 Dec 1;4(12):e2141233. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.41233.
4
Health Impact and Cost-Effectiveness of Achieving the National Salt and Sugar Reduction Initiative Voluntary Sugar Reduction Targets in the United States: A Microsimulation Study.实现美国国家减盐减糖计划自愿减糖目标对健康的影响和成本效益:一项微观模拟研究。
Circulation. 2021 Oct 26;144(17):1362-1376. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.053678. Epub 2021 Aug 27.
5
Geriatric conditions and treatment burden following diagnosis of non-muscle- invasive bladder cancer in older adults: A population-based analysis.老年人非肌层浸润性膀胱癌诊断后的老年病状况和治疗负担:基于人群的分析。
J Geriatr Oncol. 2021 Sep;12(7):1022-1030. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2021.04.005. Epub 2021 May 8.
6
Health Impact and Cost-Effectiveness of Volume, Tiered, and Absolute Sugar Content Sugar-Sweetened Beverage Tax Policies in the United States: A Microsimulation Study.美国基于容积、分级和绝对含糖量的含糖饮料税收政策对健康的影响和成本效益:一项微观模拟研究。
Circulation. 2020 Aug 11;142(6):523-534. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.042956. Epub 2020 Jun 22.
7
Tetanus, diphtheria and acellular pertussis (Tdap) vaccine for prevention of pertussis among adults aged 19 years and older in the United States: A cost-effectiveness analysis.美国成人(19 岁及以上)中预防百日咳的破伤风、白喉和无细胞百日咳(Tdap)疫苗:成本效益分析。
Prev Med. 2020 May;134:106066. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2020.106066. Epub 2020 Mar 19.
8
The Invested in Diabetes Study Protocol: a cluster randomized pragmatic trial comparing standardized and patient-driven diabetes shared medical appointments.投资于糖尿病研究方案:一项比较标准化和患者驱动的糖尿病共同医疗预约的群组随机实用试验。
Trials. 2020 Jan 10;21(1):65. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3938-7.
9
Patient-centred and not disease-focused: a review of guidelines and multimorbidity.以患者为中心而非以疾病为中心:对指南和多病共存的综述。
Singapore Med J. 2020 Nov;61(11):584-590. doi: 10.11622/smedj.2019109. Epub 2019 Sep 6.
10
Cost-effectiveness of financial incentives for improving diet and health through Medicare and Medicaid: A microsimulation study.通过医疗保险和医疗补助提高饮食和健康的经济激励的成本效益:一项微观模拟研究。
PLoS Med. 2019 Mar 19;16(3):e1002761. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002761. eCollection 2019 Mar.
Med Decis Making. 2008 Jan-Feb;28(1):56-65. doi: 10.1177/0272989X07309643.
4
Time allocation in primary care office visits.基层医疗门诊就诊的时间分配
Health Serv Res. 2007 Oct;42(5):1871-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00689.x.
5
National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey: 2005 summary.国家门诊医疗护理调查:2005年总结
Adv Data. 2007 Jun 29(387):1-39.
6
Health-related activities in the American Time Use Survey.美国时间使用调查中的健康相关活动。
Med Care. 2007 Jul;45(7):680-5. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e3180455782.
7
Get better care from your doctor: what 39,090 patients and 335 doctors have to say about how to make the most of your next appointment.从你的医生那里获得更好的护理:39090名患者和335名医生对于如何充分利用你的下一次预约有话要说。
Consum Rep. 2007 Feb;72(2):32-6.
8
Patient time costs associated with cancer care.与癌症治疗相关的患者时间成本。
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Jan 3;99(1):14-23. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djk001.
9
A systems approach to patient-centered care.一种以患者为中心的系统护理方法。
JAMA. 2006 Dec 20;296(23):2848-51. doi: 10.1001/jama.296.23.2848.
10
Collecting direct non-health care and time cost data: application to screening and diagnosis of cervical cancer.收集直接非医疗保健和时间成本数据:在宫颈癌筛查与诊断中的应用
Med Decis Making. 2006 May-Jun;26(3):265-72. doi: 10.1177/027298906288679.