• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中频主动声纳对鱼类听力的影响。

Effects of mid-frequency active sonar on hearing in fish.

机构信息

Department of Biology and Center for Comparative and Evolutionary Biology of Hearing, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742, USA.

出版信息

J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Jan;131(1):599-607. doi: 10.1121/1.3664082.

DOI:10.1121/1.3664082
PMID:22280622
Abstract

Caged fish were exposed to sound from mid-frequency active (MFA) transducers in a 5 × 5 planar array which simulated MFA sounds at received sound pressure levels of 210 dB SPL(re 1 μPa). The exposure sound consisted of a 2 s frequency sweep from 2.8 to 3.8 kHz followed by a 1 s tone at 3.3 kHz. The sound sequence was repeated every 25 s for five repetitions resulting in a cumulative sound exposure level (SEL(cum)) of 220 dB re 1 μPa(2) s. The cumulative exposure level did not affect the hearing sensitivity of rainbow trout, a species whose hearing range is lower than the frequencies in the presented MFA sound. In contrast, one cohort of channel catfish showed a statistically significant temporary threshold shift of 4-6 dB at 2300 Hz, but not at lower tested frequencies, whereas a second cohort showed no change. It is likely that this threshold shift resulted from the frequency spectrum of the MFA sound overlapping with the upper end of the hearing frequency range of the channel catfish. The observed threshold shifts in channel catfish recovered within 24 h. There was no mortality associated with the MFA sound exposure used in this test.

摘要

笼养鱼暴露在 5×5 平面阵中的中频主动(MFA)换能器产生的声音中,该换能器模拟的 MFA 声音的接收声压级为 210dB SPL(re 1 μPa)。暴露声音由 2.8 到 3.8 kHz 的 2 秒频率扫描组成,随后是 3.3 kHz 的 1 秒音调。该声音序列每 25 秒重复 5 次,导致累积声暴露水平(SEL(cum))为 220dB re 1 μPa(2)s。累积暴露水平不会影响虹鳟鱼的听力敏感性,虹鳟鱼的听力范围低于所呈现的 MFA 声音的频率。相比之下,一个盲鲷鱼队列在 2300Hz 处显示出统计学上显著的暂时阈值偏移 4-6dB,但在较低的测试频率处没有变化,而第二个队列没有变化。这种阈值偏移很可能是由于 MFA 声音的频谱与盲鲷鱼听力频率范围的上限重叠所致。盲鲷鱼的观察到的阈值偏移在 24 小时内恢复。在本试验中使用的 MFA 声音暴露下没有与死亡率相关。

相似文献

1
Effects of mid-frequency active sonar on hearing in fish.中频主动声纳对鱼类听力的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Jan;131(1):599-607. doi: 10.1121/1.3664082.
2
The effects of high-intensity, low-frequency active sonar on rainbow trout.高强度、低频有源声纳对虹鳟鱼的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Jul;122(1):623-35. doi: 10.1121/1.2735115.
3
Effects of exposure to intermittent and continuous 6-7 kHz sonar sweeps on harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) hearing.暴露于间歇性和连续性6-7千赫兹声纳扫描对港湾鼠海豚(Phocoena phocoena)听力的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2015 Apr;137(4):1623-33. doi: 10.1121/1.4916590.
4
Temporary threshold shifts and recovery in a harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena) after octave-band noise at 4 kHz.海豚(Phocoena phocoena)在 4 千赫倍频程噪声后阈移和恢复的研究
J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Nov;132(5):3525-37. doi: 10.1121/1.4757641.
5
Hearing threshold shifts and recovery in harbor seals (Phoca vitulina) after octave-band noise exposure at 4 kHz.4 kHz 倍频程噪声暴露后港湾海豹(Phoca vitulina)的听阈偏移和恢复。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Oct;132(4):2745-61. doi: 10.1121/1.4747013.
6
Exposure of fish to high-intensity sonar does not induce acute pathology.鱼类暴露在高强度声纳下不会引发急性病理学变化。
J Fish Biol. 2010 May;76(7):1825-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1095-8649.2010.02626.x.
7
Acoustical stress and hearing sensitivity in fishes: does the linear threshold shift hypothesis hold water?鱼类的声学应激与听觉敏感性:线性阈值偏移假说是否成立?
J Exp Biol. 2004 Sep;207(Pt 20):3591-602. doi: 10.1242/jeb.01188.
8
Threshold received sound pressure levels of single 1-2 kHz and 6-7 kHz up-sweeps and down-sweeps causing startle responses in a harbor porpoise (Phocoena phocoena).单频 1-2 kHz 和 6-7 kHz 上扫和下扫的阈接收声压级可引起港湾鼠海豚(Phocoena phocoena)的惊跳反应。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Mar;131(3):2325-33. doi: 10.1121/1.3682032.
9
Effects of low-frequency naval sonar exposure on three species of fish.低频水下噪声对 3 种鱼类的影响。
J Acoust Soc Am. 2013 Aug;134(2):EL205-10. doi: 10.1121/1.4812818.
10
A false killer whale reduces its hearing sensitivity when a loud sound is preceded by a warning.当强声之前有警告时,伪虎鲸会降低其听觉灵敏度。
J Exp Biol. 2013 Aug 15;216(Pt 16):3062-70. doi: 10.1242/jeb.085068. Epub 2013 Apr 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Hearing in catfishes: 200 years of research.鲶鱼的听觉:200年的研究历程
Fish Fish (Oxf). 2023 Jul;24(4):618-634. doi: 10.1111/faf.12751. Epub 2023 Apr 20.
2
Entropy and Fractal Techniques for Monitoring Fish Behaviour and Welfare in Aquacultural Precision Fish Farming-A Review.水产养殖精准养鱼中用于监测鱼类行为和福利的熵与分形技术——综述
Entropy (Basel). 2023 Mar 24;25(4):559. doi: 10.3390/e25040559.
3
Investigating impacts of and susceptibility to rail noise playback across freshwater fishes reveals counterintuitive response profiles.
调查淡水鱼类对铁路噪音回放的影响及易感性,揭示了与直觉相悖的反应模式。
Conserv Physiol. 2020 Sep 28;8(1):coaa089. doi: 10.1093/conphys/coaa089. eCollection 2020.
4
An overview of fish bioacoustics and the impacts of anthropogenic sounds on fishes.鱼类生物声学概述及人为声音对鱼类的影响。
J Fish Biol. 2019 May;94(5):692-713. doi: 10.1111/jfb.13948. Epub 2019 Apr 5.
5
Auditory evoked potential audiometry in fish.鱼类的听觉诱发电位测听法
Rev Fish Biol Fish. 2013;23(3):317-364. doi: 10.1007/s11160-012-9297-z. Epub 2013 Jan 18.
6
Effects of nautical traffic and noise on foraging patterns of Mediterranean damselfish (Chromis chromis).航海交通和噪声对地中海雀鲷(Chromis chromis)觅食模式的影响。
PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40582. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040582. Epub 2012 Jul 11.