Population Health, North Shore-LIJ Health System, Great Neck, New York 11021, USA.
Telemed J E Health. 2012 Mar;18(2):101-8. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2011.0095. Epub 2012 Jan 27.
To study the impact of remote patient monitoring (RPM) upon the most frequent diagnosis in hospitalized patients over 65 years of age-heart failure (HF). We examined the effect of RPM on hospital utilization and Medicare costs of HF patients receiving home care.
Two studies were simultaneously conducted: A randomized and a matched-cohort study. In the randomized study, 168 subjects were randomly assigned (after hospitalization) to home care utilizing RPM (live nursing visits and video-based nursing visits) or to home care receiving live nursing visits only. In the matched-cohort study, 160 subjects receiving home care with RPM (live nursing visits and video-based nursing visits) were matched with home care subjects receiving live nursing visits only.
Regardless of whether outcomes were being analyzed for all subjects (intention to treat) or for hospitalized subjects only, hospitalization rates, time to first admission, length of stay, and costs to Medicare did not differ significantly between groups in either study at 30 or 90 days after enrollment. A notable trend, however, emerged across studies: Although time to hospitalization was shorter in the RPM groups than the control groups, RPM groups had lower hospitalization costs.
RPM, when utilized in conjunction with a robust management protocol, was not found to significantly differ from live nursing visits in the management of HF in home care. Shorter hospitalization times and lower associated costs may be due to earlier identification of exacerbation. These trends indicate the need for further study.
研究远程患者监测(RPM)对 65 岁以上住院患者最常见诊断(心力衰竭(HF))的影响。我们考察了 RPM 对接受家庭护理的 HF 患者的医院利用和医疗保险费用的影响。
同时进行了两项研究:一项随机对照研究和一项匹配队列研究。在随机研究中,168 名受试者在住院后随机分配(接受家庭护理)使用 RPM(实时护理访问和基于视频的护理访问)或仅接受实时护理访问。在匹配队列研究中,接受 RPM(实时护理访问和基于视频的护理访问)的 160 名家庭护理受试者与仅接受实时护理访问的家庭护理受试者相匹配。
无论在 30 天还是 90 天的随访中,是否对所有受试者(意向治疗)或仅对住院受试者进行了结果分析,在这两项研究中,住院率、首次入院时间、住院时间和医疗保险费用在两组之间均无显著差异。然而,一个显著的趋势在两项研究中出现:尽管 RPM 组的住院时间短于对照组,但 RPM 组的住院费用较低。
当与强大的管理方案一起使用时,RPM 在家庭护理中管理 HF 方面与实时护理访问并无显著差异。较短的住院时间和较低的相关费用可能是由于更早地发现了恶化。这些趋势表明需要进一步研究。