Selby J V, Newman B, Quesenberry C P, Fabsitz R R, Carmelli D, Meaney F J, Slemenda C
Division of Research, Kaiser Permanente Medical Care Program, Oakland, CA 94611.
Int J Obes. 1990 Jul;14(7):593-602.
Genetic and environmental influences on four measures of body fat distribution - subscapular/triceps ratio (STR), waist/hip ratio (WHR), and regression-adjusted subscapular skinfold and waist circumference indices - were examined in 265 pairs of white male twins, ages 59 to 70 years, who participated in the third examination of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute's Twin Study. Skinfold indices of fat distribution were not highly correlated with indices based on body circumferences (r = 0.26-0.37 for the four possible correlations). After adjustment for overall obesity, the heritability of the adjusted subscapular skinfold index was substantial (h2 = 0.60, P less than 0.001), as were estimates for both subscapular and tricep skinfolds individually. By contrast, heritability of the STR was low and of borderline statistical significance (h2 = 0.24, P = 0.06). Heritability for the WHR (h2 = 0.31, P = 0.07) was also low. Although higher estimates were observed for the adjusted waist circumference index (h2 = 0.46, P = 0.02) and for the component circumferences, these were not clearly due to genetic influences. Among behavioral influences, cigarette smoking was strongly related to the WHR and adjusted waist circumference index (P less than 0.0001). A crude measure of total physical activity was weakly, inversely related to WHR (P = 0.06), and slightly more strongly related to the adjusted waist circumference index (P = 0.01). Skinfold indices were unrelated to either behavior. We conclude that: (1) skinfold indices measure a different dimension of fat distribution than circumference indices; (2) there is evidence for a genetic influence on subcutaneous fat distribution, but less evidence for such an influence on the WHR; (3) behavioral factors appear to be more important in determining the WHR than subcutaneous fat patterning.
在265对年龄在59至70岁的白人男性双胞胎中,研究了遗传和环境对四种体脂分布测量指标的影响,这些指标包括肩胛下/三头肌比率(STR)、腰臀比(WHR)以及回归调整后的肩胛下皮褶厚度和腰围指数。脂肪分布的皮褶厚度指标与基于身体周长的指标相关性不高(四种可能的相关性中,r = 0.26 - 0.37)。在调整总体肥胖因素后,调整后的肩胛下皮褶厚度指数的遗传度较高(h2 = 0.60,P < 0.001),肩胛下和三头肌皮褶厚度单独估计的遗传度也是如此。相比之下,STR的遗传度较低,且具有边缘统计学意义(h2 = 0.24,P = 0.06)。WHR的遗传度(h2 = 0.31,P = 0.07)也较低。尽管调整后的腰围指数(h2 = 0.46,P = 0.02)及其组成周长的估计值较高,但这些并不明显是由遗传影响所致。在行为影响因素中,吸烟与WHR和调整后的腰围指数密切相关(P < 0.0001)。总身体活动的粗略测量与WHR呈弱负相关(P = 0.06),与调整后的腰围指数的相关性稍强一些(P = 0.01)。皮褶厚度指标与这两种行为均无关。我们得出以下结论:(1)皮褶厚度指标测量的体脂分布维度与周长指标不同;(2)有证据表明遗传因素对皮下脂肪分布有影响,但对WHR的影响证据较少;(3)行为因素在决定WHR方面似乎比皮下脂肪模式更为重要。