Department of Pediatrics, University of Calgary, Canada.
Resuscitation. 2012 Jul;83(7):887-93. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2012.01.015. Epub 2012 Jan 28.
It is critical that competency in pediatric resuscitation is achieved and assessed during residency or post graduate medical training. The purpose of this study was to create and evaluate a tool to measure all elements of pediatric resuscitation team leadership competence.
An initial set of items, derived from a literature review and a brainstorming session, were refined to a 26 item assessment tool through the use of Delphi methodology. The tool was tested using videos of standardized resuscitations. A psychometric assessment of the evidence for instrument validity and reliability was undertaken.
The performance of 30 residents on two videotaped scenarios was assessed by 4 pediatricians using the tool, with 12 items assessing 'leadership and communication skills' (LCS) and 14 items assessing 'knowledge and clinical skills' (KCS). The instrument showed evidence of reliability; the Cronbach's alpha and generalizability co-efficients for the overall instrument were α=0.818 and Ep(2)=0.76, for LCS were α=0.827 and Ep(2)=0.844, and for KCS were α=0.673 and Ep(2)=0.482. While validity was initially established through literature review and brainstorming by the panel of experts, it was further built through the high strength of correlation between global scores and scores for overall performance (r=0.733), LCS (r=0.718) and KCS (r=0.662) as well as the factor analysis which accounted for 40.2% of the variance.
The results of the study demonstrate that the instrument is a valid and reliable tool to evaluate pediatric resuscitation team leader competence.
在住院医师或毕业后的医学培训期间,必须要实现并评估儿科复苏方面的能力。本研究的目的是创建并评估一种工具,以衡量儿科复苏团队领导力的所有要素。
从文献回顾和头脑风暴会议中得出的一组初始项目,通过使用德尔菲法将其精炼为 26 项评估工具。该工具通过对标准化复苏的视频进行测试。对仪器有效性和可靠性的证据进行了心理测量评估。
4 名儿科医生使用该工具评估了 30 名住院医师在两个录像场景中的表现,其中 12 项评估“领导力和沟通技巧”(LCS),14 项评估“知识和临床技能”(KCS)。该仪器具有可靠的证据;整体仪器的克朗巴赫α和通用性系数为α=0.818 和 Ep(2)=0.76,LCS 的α=0.827 和 Ep(2)=0.844,KCS 的α=0.673 和 Ep(2)=0.482。虽然通过文献回顾和专家小组的头脑风暴初步建立了有效性,但通过全球评分与整体表现评分之间的高相关性(r=0.733)、LCS(r=0.718)和 KCS(r=0.662)以及占 40.2%的方差的因素分析进一步建立了有效性。
研究结果表明,该工具是评估儿科复苏团队领导能力的有效且可靠的工具。