Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, 703 Third Street, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2081, USA.
J Exp Anal Behav. 2012 Jan;97(1):5-27. doi: 10.1901/jeab.2012.97-5.
Three experiments evaluated whether the apparent reflexivity effect reported by Sweeney and Urcuioli (2010) for pigeons might, in fact, be transitivity. In Experiment 1, pigeons learned symmetrically reinforced hue-form (A-B) and form-hue (B-A) successive matching. Those also trained on form-form (B-B) matching responded more to hue comparisons that matched their preceding samples on subsequent hue-hue (A-A) probe trials. By contrast, most pigeons trained on just A-B and B-A matching did not show this effect; but some did--a finding consistent with transitivity. Experiment 2 showed that the latter pigeons also responded more to form comparisons that matched their preceding samples on form-form (B-B) probe trials. Experiment 3 tested the prediction that hue-hue matching versus hue-hue oddity, respectively, should emerge after symmetrically versus asymmetrically reinforced arbitrary matching relations if those relations are truly transitive. For the few pigeons showing an emergent effect, comparison response rates were higher when a probe-trial comparison matched its preceding sample independently of the baseline contingencies. These results indicate neither a reflexivity nor a transitivity effect but, rather, a possible identity bias.
三个实验评估了斯威尼和乌库里奥利(2010)报告的鸽子明显的自反性效应是否实际上是传递性。在实验 1 中,鸽子学习了对称强化的色调-形状(A-B)和形状-色调(B-A)连续匹配。那些在形状-形状(B-B)匹配上接受训练的鸽子,在随后的色调-色调(A-A)探测试验中,对与他们之前的样本匹配的色调比较反应更强烈。相比之下,大多数只接受 A-B 和 B-A 匹配训练的鸽子没有表现出这种效应;但有些鸽子确实表现出了这种效应——这一发现与传递性一致。实验 2 表明,后者的鸽子在形式形式(B-B)探测试验中,对与之前样本匹配的形式比较的反应也更多。实验 3 测试了这样的预测:如果这些关系是真正的传递性的,那么在对称强化的任意匹配关系之后,应该分别出现色调-色调匹配与色调-色调奇特性,而在不对称强化的任意匹配关系之后则不会出现。对于少数表现出涌现效应的鸽子来说,当探测试验比较与基线可能性无关而与之前的样本匹配时,比较反应率更高。这些结果既不是自反性效应也不是传递性效应,而是可能的身份偏见。