Coventry University, Coventry, UK.
Anaesthesia. 2012 Apr;67(4):371-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06999.x. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
In a randomised crossover study, 60 ambulance paramedics attempted tracheal intubation of a manikin model of a Cormack and Lehane grade 3/4 view using a Portex stylet, Portex and Frova single-use bougies, and a Portex reusable bougie. Tracheal intubation within 30 s was achieved by 34/60 (57%) using the stylet, 18/60 (30%) using a Portex single-use bougie, 16/60 (27%) using a Frova single-use bougie and 5/60 (8%) using a Portex reusable bougie. The proportion intubating within 30 s was significantly higher with the stylet compared with any bougie (p < 0.001), but significantly lower with a Portex reusable bougie than any other device (p < 0.004). Participants rated the Portex reusable bougie as significantly more difficult to use than the other devices (p < 0.001). There was no evidence of a relationship between previous experience and success rate for any device.
在一项随机交叉研究中,60 名急救医务人员使用 Portex 管芯、Portex 和 Frova 一次性通气管以及 Portex 可重复使用通气管尝试对 Cormack 和 Lehane 3/4 视图的人体模型进行气管插管。34/60(57%)名医务人员使用管芯在 30 秒内完成插管,18/60(30%)名医务人员使用 Portex 一次性通气管,16/60(27%)名医务人员使用 Frova 一次性通气管,5/60(8%)名医务人员使用 Portex 可重复使用通气管。与任何通气管相比,管芯的插管成功率显著更高(p < 0.001),但与其他任何设备相比,Portex 可重复使用通气管的插管成功率显著更低(p < 0.004)。参与者认为 Portex 可重复使用通气管比其他设备更难使用(p < 0.001)。任何设备的成功率均与之前的经验无关。