• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

哮喘儿童家庭干预中的环境措施。

Environmental measures in domicilliary interventions of asthmatic children.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Tata Main Hospital, Jamshedpur, India.

出版信息

Indian J Pediatr. 2012 Sep;79(9):1169-75. doi: 10.1007/s12098-011-0674-8.

DOI:10.1007/s12098-011-0674-8
PMID:22290628
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of environmental interventions and lifestyle management on respiratory symptoms, concurrent changes in asthma management and whether any observed health benefit could be attributed to these interventions.

METHODS

A longitudinal single cohort pre-post study was conducted on children between 5–14 y with moderate to severe asthma in an outpatient clinic at Jamshedpur over 2 y. History was noted using the pre-intervention questionnaire covering a period of 3 mo prior to enrolment. Participants were followed for 6 mo post- intervention. A childhood asthma severity (CHAS) scale was made and statistical analysis such as Wilcoxon rank sum tests and Mcnemar’s test performed to validate the outcomes. Principal component analysis was performed to classify the participants having no, mild and severe symptoms.

RESULTS

There was significant reduction in symptoms and need for medical care post-intervention. Mean of the respiratory symptom score decreased from 7.4 to 2.4 (p < 0.0001) and mean of the health care utilization score decreased from 4.1 to 1.7 (p < 0.0004) in the wilcoxon rank sum tests. Mcnemar’s test was used for the analysis of individual item of the asthma symptoms. A significant reduction in wheeze and cough (p < 0.001), slowing down physical activity (p < 0.001), diurnal symptoms (p < 0.000), school absence (p < 0.000), rescue therapy requirement (p < 0.1) and hospitalization (p < 0.000) was seen. PCA was used successfully to classify the participants on the basis of their severity of asthma.

CONCLUSIONS

Respiratory symptoms decreased significantly among asthmatic children following environmental interventions.

摘要

目的

评估环境干预和生活方式管理对呼吸系统症状的影响,同时评估哮喘管理的变化,以及任何观察到的健康益处是否可归因于这些干预措施。

方法

在贾姆谢德布尔的一家门诊诊所,对 5-14 岁患有中度至重度哮喘的儿童进行了为期 2 年的纵向单队列前后研究。使用预干预问卷记录病史,该问卷涵盖了入组前 3 个月的时间段。对参与者进行了 6 个月的干预后随访。制定了儿童哮喘严重程度(CHAS)量表,并进行了 Wilcoxon 秩和检验和 McNemar 检验等统计分析,以验证结果。进行主成分分析以对无、轻度和重度症状的参与者进行分类。

结果

干预后症状和医疗需求显著减少。呼吸症状评分的平均值从 7.4 降至 2.4(p<0.0001),医疗保健利用评分的平均值从 4.1 降至 1.7(p<0.0004),Wilcoxon 秩和检验。McNemar 检验用于分析哮喘症状的各个项目。喘息和咳嗽(p<0.001)、体力活动减慢(p<0.001)、日间症状(p<0.000)、缺课(p<0.000)、抢救治疗需求(p<0.1)和住院治疗(p<0.000)均显著减少。成功地使用 PCA 根据哮喘严重程度对参与者进行分类。

结论

环境干预后,哮喘儿童的呼吸系统症状明显减轻。

相似文献

1
Environmental measures in domicilliary interventions of asthmatic children.哮喘儿童家庭干预中的环境措施。
Indian J Pediatr. 2012 Sep;79(9):1169-75. doi: 10.1007/s12098-011-0674-8.
2
Early asthma prophylaxis, natural history, skeletal development and economy (EASE): a pilot randomised controlled trial.早期哮喘预防、自然病史、骨骼发育与经济(EASE):一项随机对照试验试点研究
Health Technol Assess. 2000;4(28):1-89.
3
A community-based participatory research study of multifaceted in-home environmental interventions for pediatric asthmatics in public housing.一项针对公共住房中患哮喘病儿童的多方面居家环境干预措施的社区参与式研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Oct;63(8):2191-203. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.05.006. Epub 2006 Jun 16.
4
Acupuncture in asthmatic children: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial of efficacy.针刺治疗哮喘儿童:一项前瞻性、随机、对照疗效临床试验
Altern Ther Health Med. 2013 Jul-Aug;19(4):13-9.
5
[Impact of a small-group educational intervention for 4- to 12-year-old asthmatic children and their parents on the number of healthcare visits and quality of life].[针对4至12岁哮喘儿童及其父母的小组教育干预对医疗就诊次数和生活质量的影响]
Arch Pediatr. 2013 Nov;20(11):1201-1205. doi: 10.1016/j.arcped.2013.08.021. Epub 2013 Oct 9.
6
A childhood asthma severity scale: symptoms, medications, and health care visits.儿童哮喘严重程度量表:症状、药物治疗及医疗就诊情况
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2001 Apr;86(4):405-13. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62486-6.
7
Successful school-based intervention for inner-city children with persistent asthma.针对市中心区患有持续性哮喘的儿童的成功的校本干预措施。
J Asthma. 2004 Jun;41(4):445-53. doi: 10.1081/jas-120033987.
8
Measurement of functional severity of asthma in children.儿童哮喘功能严重程度的测量。
Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994 Jun;149(6):1434-41. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.149.6.8004295.
9
Impact of a multi-trigger intervention on seasonal patterns of asthma symptoms in inner city children.多触发因素干预对市中心儿童哮喘症状季节性模式的影响。
J Asthma. 2015;52(6):565-70. doi: 10.3109/02770903.2014.991968. Epub 2015 Jul 8.
10
A randomized, controlled study to evaluate the role of an in-home asthma disease management program provided by respiratory therapists in improving outcomes and reducing the cost of care.一项随机对照研究,旨在评估呼吸治疗师提供的家庭哮喘疾病管理项目在改善治疗效果和降低护理成本方面的作用。
J Asthma. 2009 Mar;46(2):194-201. doi: 10.1080/02770900802610068.

引用本文的文献

1
Smartphone App for monitoring Asthma in children and adolescents.用于监测儿童和青少年哮喘的智能手机应用程序。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Nov;30(11):3127-3144. doi: 10.1007/s11136-020-02706-z. Epub 2021 Jan 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Childhood asthma and environmental interventions.儿童哮喘与环境干预措施
Environ Health Perspect. 2007 Jun;115(6):971-5. doi: 10.1289/ehp.8989. Epub 2007 Jan 25.
2
A community-based participatory research study of multifaceted in-home environmental interventions for pediatric asthmatics in public housing.一项针对公共住房中患哮喘病儿童的多方面居家环境干预措施的社区参与式研究。
Soc Sci Med. 2006 Oct;63(8):2191-203. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.05.006. Epub 2006 Jun 16.
3
Effect of environmental interventions to reduce exposure to asthma triggers in homes of low-income children in Seattle.
西雅图低收入家庭儿童家中减少接触哮喘诱发因素的环境干预措施的效果
J Expo Anal Environ Epidemiol. 2004;14 Suppl 1:S133-43. doi: 10.1038/sj.jea.7500367.
4
Home intervention in the treatment of asthma among inner-city children.针对市中心区儿童哮喘治疗的家庭干预措施。
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001 Nov;108(5):732-7. doi: 10.1067/mai.2001.119155.
5
A childhood asthma severity scale: symptoms, medications, and health care visits.儿童哮喘严重程度量表:症状、药物治疗及医疗就诊情况
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2001 Apr;86(4):405-13. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62486-6.
6
Assessment of asthma severity in adults with asthma treated by family practitioners, allergists, and pulmonologists.由家庭医生、过敏症专科医生和肺科医生治疗的成年哮喘患者的哮喘严重程度评估。
Med Care. 1998 Nov;36(11):1567-77. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199811000-00006.
7
Asthma and wheezing in the first six years of life. The Group Health Medical Associates.生命最初六年中的哮喘与喘息。集团健康医疗协会。
N Engl J Med. 1995 Jan 19;332(3):133-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199501193320301.
8
Natural history of asthma in childhood--a birth cohort study.儿童哮喘的自然病史——一项出生队列研究。
Arch Dis Child. 1991 Sep;66(9):1050-3. doi: 10.1136/adc.66.9.1050.
9
Risk factors for asthma in inner city children.内城区儿童患哮喘的风险因素。
J Pediatr. 1992 Dec;121(6):862-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)80329-4.