LIM-23 Departamento de Psiquiatria, Faculdade de Medicina.
J Psychopharmacol. 1993 Jan;7(4):316-24. doi: 10.1177/026988119300700402.
An 8-week, double-blind, flexible-dose trial comparing low doses of clomipramine (mean=50 mg) with moderate doses of imipramine (mean=113.8 mg and propanteline (active placebo), was carried out in 60 out-patients with panic disorder with or without agoraphobia. Efficacy evaluation included global, anxiety and depression rating scales, and the determination of rates of relapse over up to 10 weeks of single-blind placebo follow-up. Both tricyclics were significantly more effective than propanteline, but clomipramine tended to act faster and more consistently than imipramine on most measures. Given the degree of blindness achieved and the significantly lower doses of clomipramine, this seems a better reference drug than imipramine for clinical trials in panic/agoraphobia.
一项为期 8 周、双盲、灵活剂量的试验比较了低剂量氯米帕明(平均 50 毫克)与中等剂量丙咪嗪(平均 113.8 毫克)和丙哌噻嗪(活性安慰剂),该试验纳入了 60 名伴有或不伴有广场恐怖症的惊恐障碍门诊患者。疗效评估包括总体、焦虑和抑郁评定量表,以及在长达 10 周的单盲安慰剂随访期间复发率的确定。两种三环类抗抑郁药都明显比丙哌噻嗪更有效,但氯米帕明在大多数指标上的作用似乎比丙咪嗪更快、更一致。考虑到达到的盲法程度和氯米帕明的剂量明显较低,与丙咪嗪相比,氯米帕明似乎是惊恐/广场恐怖症临床试验的更好参考药物。