Suppr超能文献

当代人群中“1918 年流感样”大流行的预期严重程度:抗菌干预的作用。

The anticipated severity of a "1918-like" influenza pandemic in contemporary populations: the contribution of antibacterial interventions.

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29219. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0029219. Epub 2012 Jan 23.

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that most of deaths in the 1918 influenza pandemic were caused by secondary bacterial infections, primarily pneumococcal pneumonia. Given the availability of antibiotics and pneumococcal vaccination, how will contemporary populations fare when they are next confronted with pandemic influenza due to a virus with the transmissibility and virulence of that of 1918? To address this question we use a mathematical model and computer simulations. Our model considers the epidemiology of both the influenza virus and pneumonia-causing bacteria and allows for co-infection by these two agents as well as antibiotic treatment, prophylaxis and pneumococcal vaccination. For our simulations we use influenza transmission and virulence parameters estimated from 1918 pandemic data. We explore the anticipated rates of secondary pneumococcal pneumonia and death in populations with different prevalence of pneumococcal carriage and contributions of antibiotic prophylaxis, treatment, and vaccination to these rates. Our analysis predicts that in countries with lower prevalence of pneumococcal carriage and access to antibiotics and pneumococcal conjugate vaccines, there would substantially fewer deaths due to pneumonia in contemporary populations confronted with a 1918-like virus than that observed in the 1918. Our results also predict that if the pneumococcal carriage prevalence is less than 40%, the positive effects of antibiotic prophylaxis and treatment would be manifest primarily at of level of individuals. These antibiotic interventions would have little effect on the incidence of pneumonia in the population at large. We conclude with the recommendation that pandemic preparedness plans should consider co-infection with and the prevalence of carriage of pneumococci and other bacteria responsible for pneumonia. While antibiotics and vaccines will certainly reduce the rate of individual mortality, the factor contributing most to the relatively lower anticipated lethality of a pandemic with a 1918-like influenza virus in contemporary population is the lower prevalence of pneumococcal carriage.

摘要

最近的研究表明,1918 年流感大流行中的大多数死亡是由继发性细菌感染引起的,主要是肺炎球菌肺炎。鉴于抗生素和肺炎球菌疫苗的可用性,当当代人群再次面临具有 1918 年流感病毒的传染性和毒力的大流行流感时,他们将如何应对?为了解决这个问题,我们使用了数学模型和计算机模拟。我们的模型考虑了流感病毒和引起肺炎的细菌的流行病学,并允许这两种病原体同时感染,以及抗生素治疗、预防和肺炎球菌疫苗接种。对于我们的模拟,我们使用了从 1918 年大流行数据中估计的流感传播和毒力参数。我们探讨了在具有不同肺炎球菌携带率的人群中,继发性肺炎球菌肺炎和死亡的预期发生率,以及抗生素预防、治疗和疫苗接种对这些发生率的贡献。我们的分析预测,在肺炎球菌携带率较低且可以获得抗生素和肺炎球菌结合疫苗的国家,当代人群中面临类似于 1918 年的病毒时,由于肺炎导致的死亡人数将大大减少,而不是像 1918 年那样。我们的结果还预测,如果肺炎球菌携带率低于 40%,抗生素预防和治疗的积极影响将主要在个人层面上表现出来。这些抗生素干预措施对人群中肺炎的发病率几乎没有影响。我们的结论是,大流行准备计划应考虑合并感染和引起肺炎的肺炎球菌和其他细菌的携带率。虽然抗生素和疫苗肯定会降低个体死亡率,但导致具有类似于 1918 年的流感病毒的大流行在当代人群中预期病死率相对较低的主要因素是肺炎球菌携带率较低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验