Newville Howard, Haller Deborah L
Department of Psychiatry, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
AIDS Care. 2012;24(6):763-8. doi: 10.1080/09540121.2011.630367. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
Some HIV+ patients continue to engage in high-risk behaviors post-diagnosis. To tailor risk reduction interventions for "positives," it is necessary to understand contributing factors. We recently showed that HIV+ patients with co-morbid Axis I psychiatric and substance use disorders had the highest rates of ongoing risk behavior and those without diagnoses the lowest; substance dependence was more impactful than psychiatric disorders. In this companion paper, we provide complementary information about Axis II pathology based on data obtained from the same sample of 179 patients receiving HIV primary care. Patients were categorized as sub-threshold or as having personality traits/disorders (BR ≥ 75) on any of the 14 personality scales of the Millon Multiaxial Personality Inventory (MCMI-III). HIV risk behaviors assessed included (1) the number of sexual partners; (2) any sex without a condom; (3) lifetime and recent injection drug use (IDU); and (4) sharing of injection equipment. After controlling for a diagnosis of alcohol or drug dependence, borderline patients were more likely to have multiple sexual partners and to use condoms irregularly. Trends for multiple sex partners also were observed among patients with antisocial and depressive personality traits/disorders. Antisocial patients also were more likely to be current IDUs. Positives with personalities characterized by risk-taking tendencies and/or decreased capacity to engage in good self-care may benefit from risk reduction interventions that take their feelings of power/invincibility or (conversely) powerlessness/helplessness into account. For patients with antisocial and/or borderline traits/disorders, a "one size fits all" intervention focusing primarily on skills training is likely to fail because the underlying factors driving behavior are not being adequately addressed.
一些HIV阳性患者在确诊后仍继续从事高风险行为。为了为“阳性患者”量身定制降低风险的干预措施,有必要了解促成因素。我们最近发现,患有共病的I轴精神疾病和物质使用障碍的HIV阳性患者持续存在风险行为的比例最高,而未被诊断出此类疾病的患者比例最低;物质依赖比精神疾病的影响更大。在这篇配套论文中,我们基于从179名接受HIV初级护理的患者同一样本中获得的数据,提供了关于II轴病理学的补充信息。患者根据米隆多轴人格问卷(MCMI-III)的14种人格量表中的任何一种被分类为亚阈值或具有人格特质/障碍(BR≥75)。评估的HIV风险行为包括:(1)性伴侣数量;(2)任何无保护措施的性行为;(3)终生及近期注射吸毒情况;(4)共用注射设备情况。在控制了酒精或药物依赖的诊断因素后,边缘型人格障碍患者更有可能有多个性伴侣且不规律使用避孕套。在具有反社会和抑郁人格特质/障碍的患者中也观察到有多个性伴侣的趋势。反社会型患者也更有可能是当前的注射吸毒者。具有冒险倾向和/或自我照顾能力下降特征的阳性患者可能会受益于考虑到他们的权力感/无敌感或(相反)无力感/无助感的降低风险干预措施。对于具有反社会和/或边缘型特质/障碍的患者,主要侧重于技能培训的“一刀切”干预措施可能会失败,因为驱动行为的潜在因素没有得到充分解决。