Suppr超能文献

颈动脉粥样硬化 MRI 信号噪声比的提高:1.5T 和 3T 的比较。

Signal-to-noise ratio increase in carotid atheroma MRI: a comparison of 1.5 and 3 T.

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK.

出版信息

Br J Radiol. 2012 Jul;85(1015):937-44. doi: 10.1259/bjr/70496948. Epub 2012 Jan 31.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

This study reports quantitative comparisons of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) at 1.5 and 3 T from images of carotid atheroma obtained using a multicontrast, cardiac-gated, blood-suppressed fast spin echo protocol.

METHODS

18 subjects, with carotid atherosclerosis (>30% stenosis) confirmed on ultrasound, were imaged on both 1.5 and 3 T systems using phased-array coils with matched hardware specifications. T(1) weighted (T(1)W), T(2) weighted (T(2)W) and proton density-weighted (PDW) images were acquired with identical scan times. Multiple slices were prescribed to encompass both the carotid bifurcation and the plaque. Image quality was quantified using the SNR and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR). A phantom experiment was also performed to validate the SNR method and confirm the size of the improvement in SNR. Comparisons of the SNR values from the vessel wall with muscle and plaque/lumen CNR measurements were performed at a patient level. To account for the multiple comparisons a Bonferroni correction was applied.

RESULTS

One subject was excluded from the protocol owing to image quality and protocol failure. The mean improvement in SNR in plaque was 1.9, 2.1 and 2.1 in T(1)W, T(2)W and PDW images, respectively. All plaque SNR improvements were statistically significant at the p<0.05 level. The phantom experiment reported an improvement in SNR of 2.4 for PDW images.

CONCLUSIONS

Significant gains in SNR can be obtained for carotid atheroma imaging at 3 T compared with 1.5 T. There was also a trend towards increased CNR. However, this was not significant after the application of the Bonferroni correction.

摘要

目的

本研究报告了使用多对比度、心脏门控、血液抑制快速自旋回波序列获得的颈动脉粥样硬化斑块图像的信噪比(SNR)在 1.5T 和 3T 之间的定量比较。

方法

18 名颈动脉粥样硬化(狭窄率>30%)患者经超声证实,使用相控阵线圈在 1.5T 和 3T 系统上进行成像,硬件规格匹配。采集 T1 加权(T1W)、T2 加权(T2W)和质子密度加权(PDW)图像,扫描时间相同。规定了多个切片以涵盖颈动脉分叉和斑块。使用 SNR 和对比噪声比(CNR)来量化图像质量。还进行了一项体模实验来验证 SNR 方法并确认 SNR 提高的幅度。在患者水平上比较了血管壁与肌肉和斑块/管腔 CNR 测量的 SNR 值。为了考虑多次比较,应用了 Bonferroni 校正。

结果

由于图像质量和协议失败,一名受试者被排除在方案之外。斑块的 SNR 平均提高分别为 1.9、2.1 和 2.1,在 T1W、T2W 和 PDW 图像中。所有斑块 SNR 提高均在 p<0.05 水平具有统计学意义。体模实验报告 PDW 图像的 SNR 提高了 2.4。

结论

与 1.5T 相比,3T 可获得颈动脉粥样硬化成像的 SNR 显著提高。CNR 也有增加的趋势。然而,在应用 Bonferroni 校正后,这并没有统计学意义。

相似文献

3
Bright and black blood imaging of the carotid bifurcation at 3.0T.3.0T下颈动脉分叉处的亮血与黑血成像
Eur J Radiol. 2006 Mar;57(3):403-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2005.12.028. Epub 2006 Jan 26.
5
Vulnerable plaque detection by 3.0 tesla magnetic resonance imaging.3.0特斯拉磁共振成像检测易损斑块
Invest Radiol. 2006 Feb;41(2):112-5. doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000186419.55504.30.
6
Comparison of four MR carotid surface coils at 3T.3T 下四种磁共振颈动脉表面线圈的比较。
PLoS One. 2019 Mar 4;14(3):e0213107. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0213107. eCollection 2019.
8
3.0 T plaque imaging.3.0 T斑块成像。
Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Oct;18(5):389-400. doi: 10.1097/rmr.0b013e3181598dc6.

引用本文的文献

6
Advances in MRI for the evaluation of carotid atherosclerosis.用于评估颈动脉粥样硬化的磁共振成像进展
Br J Radiol. 2015 Aug;88(1052):20140282. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20140282. Epub 2015 Mar 31.

本文引用的文献

3
Measurement of signal-to-noise ratios in sum-of-squares MR images.平方和磁共振图像中信噪比的测量。
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Dec;26(6):1678; author reply 1679. doi: 10.1002/jmri.21171.
4
3.0 T plaque imaging.3.0 T斑块成像。
Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Oct;18(5):389-400. doi: 10.1097/rmr.0b013e3181598dc6.
9
Vulnerable plaque detection by 3.0 tesla magnetic resonance imaging.3.0特斯拉磁共振成像检测易损斑块
Invest Radiol. 2006 Feb;41(2):112-5. doi: 10.1097/01.rli.0000186419.55504.30.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验