Suppr超能文献

颈动脉多对比黑血磁共振成像:1.5特斯拉与3特斯拉磁场强度的比较

Multicontrast black-blood MRI of carotid arteries: comparison between 1.5 and 3 tesla magnetic field strengths.

作者信息

Yarnykh Vasily L, Terashima Masahiro, Hayes Cecil E, Shimakawa Ann, Takaya Norihide, Nguyen Patricia K, Brittain Jean H, McConnell Michael V, Yuan Chun

机构信息

Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington 98195, USA.

出版信息

J Magn Reson Imaging. 2006 May;23(5):691-8. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20562.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To compare black-blood multicontrast carotid imaging at 3T and 1.5T and assess compatibility between morphological measurements of carotid arteries at 1.5T and 3T.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five healthy subjects and two atherosclerosis patients were scanned in 1.5T and 3T scanners with a similar protocol providing transverse T1-, T2-, and proton density (PD)-weighted black-blood images using a fast spin-echo sequence with single- (T1-weighted) or multislice (PD-/T2-weighted) double inversion recovery (DIR) preparation. Wall and lumen signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and wall/lumen contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were compared in 44 artery cross-sections by paired t-test. Interscanner variability of the lumen area (LA), wall area (WA), and mean wall thickness (MWT) was assessed using Bland-Altman analysis.

RESULTS

Wall SNR and lumen/wall CNR significantly increased (P < 0.0001) at 3T with a 1.5-fold gain for T1-weighted images and a 1.7/1.8-fold gain for PD-/T2-weighted images. Lumen SNR did not differ for single-slice DIR T1-weighted images (P = 0.2), but was larger at 3T for multislice DIR PD-/T2-weighted images (P = 0.01/0.03). The LA, WA, and MWT demonstrated good agreement with no significant bias (P 0.5), a coefficient of variation (CV) of < 10%, and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of > 0.95.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated significant improvement in SNR, CNR, and image quality for high- resolution black-blood imaging of carotid arteries at 3T. Morphologic measurements are compatible between 1.5T and 3T.

摘要

目的

比较3T和1.5T场强下的黑血多对比度颈动脉成像,并评估1.5T和3T场强下颈动脉形态学测量的兼容性。

材料与方法

对5名健康受试者和2名动脉粥样硬化患者分别在1.5T和3T扫描仪上进行扫描,扫描协议相似,使用快速自旋回波序列及单激发(T1加权)或多层(质子密度/ T2加权)双反转恢复(DIR)准备,提供横断面T1加权、T2加权和质子密度(PD)加权的黑血图像。通过配对t检验比较44个动脉横截面的血管壁和管腔信噪比(SNR)以及血管壁/管腔对比噪声比(CNR)。使用Bland-Altman分析评估扫描仪间管腔面积(LA)、血管壁面积(WA)和平均血管壁厚度(MWT)的变异性。

结果

3T场强下血管壁SNR和管腔/血管壁CNR显著增加(P < 0.0001),T1加权图像增益1.5倍,PD/T2加权图像增益1.7/1.8倍。单激发DIR T1加权图像的管腔SNR无差异(P = 0.2),但多层DIR PD/T2加权图像在3T场强时更大(P = 0.01/0.03)。LA、WA和MWT显示出良好的一致性,无显著偏差(P>0.5),变异系数(CV)<10%,组内相关系数(ICC)>0.95。

结论

本研究表明,3T场强下颈动脉高分辨率黑血成像的SNR、CNR和图像质量有显著改善。1.5T和3T场强下的形态学测量具有兼容性。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验