Department of Dermatology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, SE5 9RS, London, UK.
Br J Dermatol. 2012 Jun;166(6):1160-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10870.x. Epub 2012 May 8.
This review investigates the effectiveness of ablative and nonablative fractional photothermolysis (FP) lasers for treating facial acne scars. Twenty-six studies (13 ablative FP, 13 nonablative FP) published between 2003 and January 2011 were reviewed. Quantitative and qualitative data from each article were examined and analysed. Four studies were split-face randomized controlled studies. While the data analysed were all clinically relevant and significant, there were some methodological differences between the studies. Outcomes included subjective and objective assessment of scar appearance, pre- and postoperative treatment, side-effects and pain scores. A small number of studies used three-dimensional optical imaging profiling and histology for objective assessment. Even allowing for methodological variability, ablative FP had an improvement range of 26-83% whereas nonablative FP had an improvement range of 26-50%. Patients who underwent treatment with an ablative FP laser experienced erythema for 3-14 days which resolved by 12 weeks, whereas patients who opted for the nonablative FP laser experienced erythema for between 1 and 3 days and this resolved within a week. A higher proportion of patients (up to 92·3%) who underwent ablative FP experienced postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) than those who had nonablative FP (up to 13%). The maximum duration of PIH in ablative FP was up to 6 months whereas in nonablative FP it lasted for up to 1 week. The procedure with ablative FP was relatively uncomfortable compared with nonablative FP. The pain score with ablative FP ranged from 5·90 to 8·10 (scale 1-10) and with nonablative FP from 3·90 to 5·66 (scale 1-10).
这篇综述调查了烧蚀性和非烧蚀性分数光热解(FP)激光治疗面部痤疮疤痕的效果。 共回顾了 2003 年至 2011 年 1 月发表的 26 项研究(13 项烧蚀性 FP,13 项非烧蚀性 FP)。 检查和分析了每篇文章的定量和定性数据。 有 4 项研究是分割面随机对照研究。 虽然分析的数据均具有临床相关性和重要性,但研究之间存在一些方法学差异。 结果包括疤痕外观的主观和客观评估、术前和术后治疗、副作用和疼痛评分。 少数研究使用三维光学成像轮廓和组织学进行客观评估。 即使考虑到方法学的可变性,烧蚀性 FP 的改善范围为 26%-83%,而非烧蚀性 FP 的改善范围为 26%-50%。 接受烧蚀性 FP 激光治疗的患者出现红斑持续 3-14 天,在 12 周内消退,而选择非烧蚀性 FP 激光治疗的患者出现红斑持续 1-3 天,在一周内消退。 接受烧蚀性 FP 的患者中(高达 92.3%)发生炎症后色素沉着(PIH)的比例高于接受非烧蚀性 FP 的患者(高达 13%)。 烧蚀性 FP 的 PIH 最长持续时间为 6 个月,而非烧蚀性 FP 为 1 周。 与非烧蚀性 FP 相比,烧蚀性 FP 的过程相对不舒服。 烧蚀性 FP 的疼痛评分范围为 5.90-8.10(1-10 分),而非烧蚀性 FP 的疼痛评分为 3.90-5.66(1-10 分)。