• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

分激光换肤治疗痤疮瘢痕:综述。

Fractional laser resurfacing for acne scars: a review.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Denmark Hill, SE5 9RS, London, UK.

出版信息

Br J Dermatol. 2012 Jun;166(6):1160-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10870.x. Epub 2012 May 8.

DOI:10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10870.x
PMID:22296284
Abstract

This review investigates the effectiveness of ablative and nonablative fractional photothermolysis (FP) lasers for treating facial acne scars. Twenty-six studies (13 ablative FP, 13 nonablative FP) published between 2003 and January 2011 were reviewed. Quantitative and qualitative data from each article were examined and analysed. Four studies were split-face randomized controlled studies. While the data analysed were all clinically relevant and significant, there were some methodological differences between the studies. Outcomes included subjective and objective assessment of scar appearance, pre- and postoperative treatment, side-effects and pain scores. A small number of studies used three-dimensional optical imaging profiling and histology for objective assessment. Even allowing for methodological variability, ablative FP had an improvement range of 26-83% whereas nonablative FP had an improvement range of 26-50%. Patients who underwent treatment with an ablative FP laser experienced erythema for 3-14 days which resolved by 12 weeks, whereas patients who opted for the nonablative FP laser experienced erythema for between 1 and 3 days and this resolved within a week. A higher proportion of patients (up to 92·3%) who underwent ablative FP experienced postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (PIH) than those who had nonablative FP (up to 13%). The maximum duration of PIH in ablative FP was up to 6 months whereas in nonablative FP it lasted for up to 1 week. The procedure with ablative FP was relatively uncomfortable compared with nonablative FP. The pain score with ablative FP ranged from 5·90 to 8·10 (scale 1-10) and with nonablative FP from 3·90 to 5·66 (scale 1-10).

摘要

这篇综述调查了烧蚀性和非烧蚀性分数光热解(FP)激光治疗面部痤疮疤痕的效果。 共回顾了 2003 年至 2011 年 1 月发表的 26 项研究(13 项烧蚀性 FP,13 项非烧蚀性 FP)。 检查和分析了每篇文章的定量和定性数据。 有 4 项研究是分割面随机对照研究。 虽然分析的数据均具有临床相关性和重要性,但研究之间存在一些方法学差异。 结果包括疤痕外观的主观和客观评估、术前和术后治疗、副作用和疼痛评分。 少数研究使用三维光学成像轮廓和组织学进行客观评估。 即使考虑到方法学的可变性,烧蚀性 FP 的改善范围为 26%-83%,而非烧蚀性 FP 的改善范围为 26%-50%。 接受烧蚀性 FP 激光治疗的患者出现红斑持续 3-14 天,在 12 周内消退,而选择非烧蚀性 FP 激光治疗的患者出现红斑持续 1-3 天,在一周内消退。 接受烧蚀性 FP 的患者中(高达 92.3%)发生炎症后色素沉着(PIH)的比例高于接受非烧蚀性 FP 的患者(高达 13%)。 烧蚀性 FP 的 PIH 最长持续时间为 6 个月,而非烧蚀性 FP 为 1 周。 与非烧蚀性 FP 相比,烧蚀性 FP 的过程相对不舒服。 烧蚀性 FP 的疼痛评分范围为 5.90-8.10(1-10 分),而非烧蚀性 FP 的疼痛评分为 3.90-5.66(1-10 分)。

相似文献

1
Fractional laser resurfacing for acne scars: a review.分激光换肤治疗痤疮瘢痕:综述。
Br J Dermatol. 2012 Jun;166(6):1160-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10870.x. Epub 2012 May 8.
2
Successful treatment of acneiform scarring with CO2 ablative fractional resurfacing.二氧化碳剥脱性分次皮肤磨削术成功治疗痤疮样瘢痕。
Lasers Surg Med. 2008 Aug;40(6):381-6. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20659.
3
Fractional resurfacing for the treatment of atrophic facial acne scars in asian skin.分次焕肤治疗亚洲人面部萎缩性痤疮瘢痕
Dermatol Surg. 2009 May;35(5):826-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2009.01139.x. Epub 2009 Apr 6.
4
Subcision and 1320-nm Nd:YAG nonablative laser resurfacing for the treatment of acne scars: a simultaneous split-face single patient trial.皮下分离术与1320纳米掺钕钇铝石榴石非剥脱性激光换肤术治疗痤疮瘢痕:一项同步半脸单病例试验
Dermatol Surg. 2004 Oct;30(10):1356-59; discussion 1360. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2004.30411.x.
5
Comparison of Nonablative Fractional Erbium Laser 1,340 nm and Microneedling for the Treatment of Atrophic Acne Scars: A Randomized Clinical Trial.非剥脱性1340纳米铒激光与微针治疗萎缩性痤疮瘢痕的比较:一项随机临床试验
Dermatol Surg. 2016 Feb;42(2):232-41. doi: 10.1097/DSS.0000000000000597.
6
Nonablative 1450-nm diode laser in the treatment of facial atrophic acne scars in type IV to V Asian skin: a prospective clinical study.非剥脱性1450纳米二极管激光治疗IV至V型亚洲皮肤面部萎缩性痤疮瘢痕:一项前瞻性临床研究。
Dermatol Surg. 2004 Oct;30(10):1287-91. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4725.2004.30402.x.
7
Fractional nonablative 1540 nm laser resurfacing for thermal burn scars: a randomized controlled trial.1540纳米非剥脱性分次激光换肤治疗热烧伤瘢痕:一项随机对照试验
Lasers Surg Med. 2009 Mar;41(3):189-95. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20756.
8
Evaluation of a novel fractional resurfacing device for treatment of acne scarring.一种新型分次换肤设备治疗痤疮瘢痕的评估。
Lasers Surg Med. 2009 Feb;41(2):122-7. doi: 10.1002/lsm.20725.
9
Combined fractional ablative and nonablative laser resurfacing treatment: a split-face comparative study.联合分次剥脱性和非剥脱性激光换肤治疗:一项半脸对照研究。
J Drugs Dermatol. 2013 Feb;12(2):175-8.
10
Acne scars in ethnic skin treated with both non-ablative fractional 1,550 nm and ablative fractional CO2 lasers: comparative retrospective analysis with recommended guidelines.非剥脱性1550nm分数激光与剥脱性分数二氧化碳激光治疗不同种族皮肤痤疮瘢痕的比较回顾性分析及推荐指南
Lasers Surg Med. 2011 Sep;43(8):787-91. doi: 10.1002/lsm.21092.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Non-insulated Microneedle Fractional Radiofrequency and Ablative Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser for the Treatment of Facial Atrophic Acne Scarring: A Pilot Randomized Split-face Clinical Study.非绝缘微针分数射频与剥脱性分数二氧化碳激光治疗面部萎缩性痤疮瘢痕的比较:一项初步随机半脸临床研究。
Acta Derm Venereol. 2025 Jun 26;105:adv43611. doi: 10.2340/actadv.v105.43611.
2
Global research trends and hotspots in the application of lasers for acne treatment from 1986 to 2022: bibliometric and visual analysis.1986年至2022年激光治疗痤疮应用的全球研究趋势与热点:文献计量学与可视化分析
Lasers Med Sci. 2025 Feb 14;40(1):88. doi: 10.1007/s10103-025-04353-7.
3
Energy-Based Devices for the Treatment of Facial Skin Conditions in Skin of Color.
用于治疗有色人种面部皮肤疾病的基于能量的设备。
J Clin Aesthet Dermatol. 2024 Jun;17(6):22-32.
4
Atrophic Postacne Scar Treatment: Narrative Review.萎缩性痤疮瘢痕的治疗:叙述性综述
JMIR Dermatol. 2024 Feb 21;7:e49954. doi: 10.2196/49954.
5
Comparison of 1064-nm Nd:YAG picosecond laser using fractional micro-lens array vs. ablative fractional 2940-nm Er:YAG laser for the treatment of atrophic acne scar in Asians: a 20-week prospective, randomized, split-face, controlled pilot study.1064纳米掺钕钇铝石榴石皮秒激光联合微透镜阵列与2940纳米剥脱性铒激光治疗亚洲人萎缩性痤疮瘢痕的比较:一项为期20周的前瞻性、随机、半脸、对照性初步研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2023 Nov 16;10:1248831. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2023.1248831. eCollection 2023.
6
Efficacy of fractional CO laser in combination with stromal vascular fraction (SVF) compared with fractional CO laser alone in the treatment of burn scars: a randomized controlled clinical trial.分比 CO2 激光联合基质血管成分(SVF)与单纯分比 CO2 激光治疗烧伤瘢痕的疗效比较:一项随机对照临床试验。
Stem Cell Res Ther. 2023 Sep 23;14(1):269. doi: 10.1186/s13287-023-03480-8.
7
Israeli Innovations in the Field of Plastic Surgery.以色列在整形外科学领域的创新。
Semin Plast Surg. 2022 May 26;36(2):55-65. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1748916. eCollection 2022 May.
8
Treatment of acne scars with fractional carbon dioxide laser in Asians: a retrospective study to search for predicting factors associated with efficacy.亚洲人用分幅二氧化碳激光治疗痤疮疤痕:一项寻找与疗效相关的预测因素的回顾性研究。
Lasers Med Sci. 2022 Aug;37(6):2623-2627. doi: 10.1007/s10103-022-03528-w. Epub 2022 Feb 26.
9
A Prospective, Nonrandomized, Open-label Study, Comparing the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Fractional CO Laser versus Fractional Microneedling Radio Frequency in Acne Scars.一项前瞻性、非随机、开放标签研究,比较分次二氧化碳激光与分次微针射频治疗痤疮瘢痕的疗效、安全性和耐受性。
J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2021 Apr-Jun;14(2):177-183. doi: 10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_65_19.
10
Putting the Pieces Back Together: Optimizing Function and Appearance after Orbital Surgery.修复如初:优化眼眶手术后的功能与外观
J Neurol Surg B Skull Base. 2021 Feb;82(1):154-160. doi: 10.1055/s-0040-1722631. Epub 2021 Feb 22.