de Boer R
Department of Pure and Applied Ecology Section, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1990 Nov;86(5):808-14. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(05)80187-3.
Used rugs were vacuum cleaned, "wet cleaned," "shampooed," or heated in an autoclave. The effects on the live-mite population, on the allergen (Dermatophagoides pteronyssinus, Der p I and Der p II; and Dermatophagoides farinae, Der f II) content, and on the suitability of the rugs as a habitat for house dust mites was studied. Autoclaving was most effective in all three aspects. The cleaning methods were quite inefficient for killing the mites, but a significant reduction of allergens and deterioration of the habitat quality was established. "Wet cleaning" appears particularly promising.
用过的地毯经过真空清洁、“湿洗”、“用洗发水清洗”或在高压灭菌器中加热处理。研究了这些处理对活螨数量、过敏原（屋尘螨、Der p I和Der p II；粉尘螨、Der f II）含量以及地毯作为屋尘螨栖息地适宜性的影响。高压灭菌在这三个方面最为有效。这些清洁方法在杀死螨虫方面效率相当低，但能显著降低过敏原含量并使栖息地质量变差。“湿洗”似乎特别有前景。
