Suppr超能文献

能否通过平均 2 千赫兹和 4 千赫兹来计算 3 千赫兹阈值?

Is it valid to calculate the 3-kilohertz threshold by averaging 2 and 4 kilohertz?

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-5739, USA.

出版信息

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2012 Jul;147(1):102-4. doi: 10.1177/0194599812437156. Epub 2012 Feb 2.

Abstract

Many guidelines for reporting hearing results use the threshold at 3 kilohertz (kHz), a frequency not measured routinely. This study assessed the validity of estimating the missing 3-kHz threshold by averaging the measured thresholds at 2 and 4 kHz. The estimated threshold was compared to the measured threshold at 3 kHz individually and when used in the pure-tone average (PTA) of 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 kHz in audiometric data from 2170 patients. The difference between the estimated and measured thresholds for 3 kHz was within ± 5 dB in 72% of audiograms, ± 10 dB in 91%, and within ± 20 dB in 99% (correlation coefficient r = 0.965). The difference between the PTA threshold using the estimated threshold compared with using the measured threshold at 3 kHz was within ± 5 dB in 99% of audiograms (r = 0.997). The estimated threshold accurately approximates the measured threshold at 3 kHz, especially when incorporated into the PTA.

摘要

许多报告听力结果的指南都使用 3 千赫兹(kHz)的阈值,这是一个不常规测量的频率。本研究评估了通过平均测量的 2 和 4 kHz 阈值来估计缺失的 3 kHz 阈值的有效性。在 2170 名患者的听力数据中,将估计的阈值与单独测量的 3 kHz 阈值以及用于 0.5、1、2 和 3 kHz 的纯音平均值(PTA)进行了比较。在 72%的听力图中,估计的和测量的 3 kHz 阈值之间的差异在± 5 dB 以内,在 91%的听力图中差异在± 10 dB 以内,在 99%的听力图中差异在± 20 dB 以内(相关系数 r = 0.965)。与使用测量的 3 kHz 阈值相比,使用估计的阈值的 PTA 阈值之间的差异在 99%的听力图中在± 5 dB 以内(r = 0.997)。估计的阈值可准确近似 3 kHz 时的测量阈值,尤其是在纳入 PTA 时。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验