Suppr超能文献

视频辅助与传统全甲状腺切除术及中央区颈部淋巴结清扫术治疗甲状腺乳头状癌的比较。

Video-assisted versus conventional total thyroidectomy and central compartment neck dissection for papillary thyroid carcinoma.

机构信息

Division of General and Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Policlinico A. Gemelli, L.go A. Gemelli 8, 00168 Rome, Italy.

出版信息

World J Surg. 2012 Jun;36(6):1225-30. doi: 10.1007/s00268-012-1439-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although video-assisted (VA) thyroidectomy emerged as effective treatment for selected patients with papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), some concerns remain about obtaining adequate central neck node clearance. We compared patients who underwent VA and conventional total thyroidectomy (TT) and central compartment dissection (CCD) for PTC.

METHODS

A total of 52 consecutive patients successfully underwent VA-TT and VA-CCD for PTC (VA group) were compared to 52 controls who underwent conventional TT and CCD (C group) for PTC.

RESULTS

The two groups were matched for age (p = 0.75), sex (p = 0.07), and tumor size (p = 1.0). Operating time (p = 0.23), overall postoperative complications (p = 0.41), pT (p = 0.44), and pN (p = 0.84) were similar in the two groups. The mean number of removed nodes was similar (10.6 ± 4.6 in VA group vs. 12.2 ± 5.6 in C group) (p = 0.11).Mean postoperative serum thyroglobulin (sTg) off levothyroxine (LT4) suppressive treatment was 3.2 ± 5.0 ng/ ml in the VA group and 2.6 ± 7.4 ng/ml in the C-group (P = 0.67). Mean postoperative radioiodine uptake (RAIU) was similar in the two groups (1.5 ± 1.3 vs. 1.7 ± 1.3%) (p = 0.49). When pN1a patients alone were considered, no difference was found between the VA group (21 patients) and the controls (24 patients) concerning the mean number of removed nodes (10.3 ± 4.1 vs. 12.4 ± 5.6) (p = 0.16), the mean sTg off LT4 (4.4 ± 6.0 vs. 1.9 ± 2.7 ng/ml) (p = 0.07) and the mean RAIU (1.9 ± 1.5 vs. 1.7% ± 1.3%) (p = 0.63).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of VA-TT and CCD in selected cases of PTC appear to be comparable to those of conventional surgery. A longer follow-up and larger series are necessary to draw definitive conclusions concerning longterm outcomes.

摘要

背景

尽管视频辅助(VA)甲状腺切除术已成为治疗选定的甲状腺乳头状癌(PTC)患者的有效方法,但对于获得充分的中央颈部淋巴结清扫仍存在一些担忧。我们比较了接受 VA 和传统全甲状腺切除术(TT)和中央隔室解剖(CCD)治疗 PTC 的患者。

方法

52 例连续接受 VA-TT 和 VA-CCD 治疗 PTC(VA 组)的患者与 52 例接受传统 TT 和 CCD 治疗 PTC(C 组)的患者进行比较。

结果

两组在年龄(p = 0.75)、性别(p = 0.07)和肿瘤大小(p = 1.0)方面匹配。手术时间(p = 0.23)、总术后并发症(p = 0.41)、pT(p = 0.44)和 pN(p = 0.84)在两组中相似。切除的淋巴结数量相似(VA 组 10.6 ± 4.6 个,C 组 12.2 ± 5.6 个)(p = 0.11)。术后停用左甲状腺素(LT4)抑制治疗后,血清甲状腺球蛋白(sTg)的平均水平在 VA 组为 3.2 ± 5.0 ng/ml,在 C 组为 2.6 ± 7.4 ng/ml(P = 0.67)。两组术后放射性碘摄取率(RAIU)相似(1.5 ± 1.3% vs. 1.7 ± 1.3%)(p = 0.49)。当仅考虑 pN1a 患者时,VA 组(21 例)与对照组(24 例)在切除的淋巴结数量(10.3 ± 4.1 与 12.4 ± 5.6)、术后停用 LT4 后 sTg 的平均水平(4.4 ± 6.0 与 1.9 ± 2.7 ng/ml)(p = 0.16)和 RAIU 的平均水平(1.9 ± 1.5% 与 1.7 ± 1.3%)(p = 0.63)方面均无差异。

结论

VA-TT 和 CCD 在选定的 PTC 病例中的结果似乎与传统手术相当。需要更长的随访和更大的系列来得出关于长期结果的明确结论。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验