Welch Center for Prevention, Epidemiology and Clinical Research, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Am J Kidney Dis. 2012 May;59(5):653-62. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2011.11.042. Epub 2012 Feb 4.
Cystatin C level predicts mortality more strongly than serum creatinine level. It is unknown whether this advantage extends to other outcomes, such as kidney failure, or whether other novel renal filtration markers share this advantage in predicting outcomes.
Observational cohort study.
SETTING & PARTICIPANTS: 9,988 participants in the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study, a population-based study in 4 US communities, followed for approximately 10 years.
Serum creatinine-based estimated glomerular filtration rate calculated using the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation (eGFR(CKD-EPI)) and cystatin C, β-trace protein (BTP), and β(2)-microglobulin (B2M) levels.
Mortality, coronary heart disease, heart failure, and kidney failure.
Higher cystatin C and B2M concentrations were associated more strongly with mortality (n = 1,425) than BTP level and all were associated more strongly than eGFR(CKD-EPI) (adjusted HR for the upper 6.7 percentile compared with the lowest quintile: 1.6 [95% CI, 1.3-1.9] for eGFR(CKD-EPI), 2.9 [95% CI, 2.3-3.6] for cystatin C level, 1.9 [95% CI, 1.5-2.4] for BTP level, and 3.0 [95% CI, 2.4-3.8] for B2M level). Similar patterns were observed for coronary heart disease (n = 1,279), heart failure (n = 803), and kidney failure (n = 130). The addition of cystatin C, BTP, and B2M levels to models including eGFR(CKD-EPI) and all covariates, including urinary albumin-creatinine ratio, significantly improved risk prediction for all outcomes (P < 0.001).
No direct measurement of GFR.
B2M and, to a lesser extent, BTP levels share cystatin C's advantage over eGFR(CKD-EPI) in predicting outcomes, including kidney failure. These additional markers may be helpful in improving estimation of risk associated with decreased kidney function beyond current estimates based on eGFR(CKD-EPI).
胱抑素 C 水平比血清肌酐水平更能准确预测死亡率。目前尚不清楚这种优势是否适用于其他结果,如肾衰竭,或者其他新型肾脏滤过标志物在预测结果方面是否具有这种优势。
观察性队列研究。
来自美国 4 个社区的动脉粥样硬化风险社区(ARIC)研究中的 9988 名参与者,随访时间约为 10 年。
基于慢性肾脏病流行病学合作(CKD-EPI)方程计算的血清肌酐估算肾小球滤过率(eGFR(CKD-EPI))以及胱抑素 C、β-痕迹蛋白(BTP)和β(2)-微球蛋白(B2M)水平。
死亡率、冠心病、心力衰竭和肾衰竭。
较高的胱抑素 C 和 B2M 浓度与死亡率(n=1425)的相关性强于 BTP 水平,与 eGFR(CKD-EPI)的相关性均强(与最低五分位组相比,上 6.7%分位组的调整 HR:eGFR(CKD-EPI)为 1.6 [95%CI,1.3-1.9],胱抑素 C 水平为 2.9 [95%CI,2.3-3.6],BTP 水平为 1.9 [95%CI,1.5-2.4],B2M 水平为 3.0 [95%CI,2.4-3.8])。在冠心病(n=1279)、心力衰竭(n=803)和肾衰竭(n=130)患者中也观察到了类似的模式。在包含 eGFR(CKD-EPI)和所有协变量(包括尿白蛋白/肌酐比)的模型中加入胱抑素 C、BTP 和 B2M 水平后,所有结局的风险预测均显著改善(P<0.001)。
没有直接测量 GFR。
B2M 和在较小程度上,BTP 水平与胱抑素 C 一样,在预测包括肾衰竭在内的结局方面优于 eGFR(CKD-EPI)。这些额外的标志物可能有助于改善基于 eGFR(CKD-EPI)的当前估计值,更好地估计与肾功能下降相关的风险。