Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, 624 N. Broadway, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA.
J Anxiety Disord. 2012 Apr;26(3):409-15. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2011.12.015. Epub 2012 Jan 12.
The present study assessed potential gender differences between the two prevailing PTSD models - the emotional numbing (King, Leskin, King, & Weathers, 1998) and dysphoria (Simms, Watson, & Doebbelling, 2002) models - in order to establish whether one model is superior with regard to its cross-gender generalizability. The sample included 188 female and 690 male trauma-exposed United States Veterans presenting to Veterans Affairs primary care medical clinics. Multigroup confirmatory factor analyses with covariates (MIMIC models) were conducted using the PTSD Checklist. The covariates included were socio-demographic variables and the type of traumatic event experienced. The emotional numbing model was statistically superior for men, but no difference between models was noted for females. After controlling for model covariates, men reported higher item-level severity and women had larger residual error variances and larger factor variances and covariances in the emotional numbing model. These results suggest partial generalizability of the emotional numbing model across gender.
本研究评估了两种流行的 PTSD 模型(情绪麻木模型[King、Leskin、King 和 Weathers,1998]和抑郁模型[Simms、Watson 和 Doebbelling,2002])之间的潜在性别差异,以确定其中一种模型在跨性别推广方面是否具有优势。该样本包括 188 名女性和 690 名男性创伤后暴露于退伍军人事务初级保健诊所的美国退伍军人。使用 PTSD 检查表进行了带有协变量的多组验证性因素分析(MIMIC 模型)。协变量包括社会人口统计学变量和经历的创伤事件类型。对于男性,情绪麻木模型在统计学上更优,但对于女性,两种模型之间没有差异。在控制模型协变量后,男性报告的项目水平严重程度更高,而女性在情绪麻木模型中的残差误差方差更大,因子方差和协方差也更大。这些结果表明,情绪麻木模型在性别方面具有部分可推广性。