Designing isothermal titration calorimetry experiments for the study of 1:1 binding: problems with the "standard protocol".

Literature recommendations for designing isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) experiments to study 1:1 binding, M+X -->/<-- MX, are not consistent and have persisted through time with little quantitative justification. In particular, the "standard protocol" employed by most workers involves 20 to 30 injections of titrant to a final titrant/titrand mole ratio (R(m)) of ~ 2-a scheme that can be far from optimal and can needlessly limit applicability of the ITC technique. These deficiencies are discussed here along with other misconceptions. Whether a specific binding process can be studied by ITC is determined less by c (the product of binding constant K and titrand concentration M) than by the total detectable heat q(tot) and the extent to which M can be converted to MX. As guidelines, with 90% conversion to MX, K can be estimated within 5% over the range 10 to 10(8)M(-1) when q(tot)/σ(q)≈700, where σ(q) is the standard deviation for estimation of q. This ratio drops to ~150 when the stoichiometry parameter n is treated as known. A computer application for modeling 1:1 binding yields realistic estimates of parameter standard errors for use in protocol design and feasibility assessment.