• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

淋巴结阴性乳腺癌:由肿瘤大小和流式细胞术定义的预后亚组。

Node-negative breast cancer: prognostic subgroups defined by tumor size and flow cytometry.

作者信息

O'Reilly S M, Camplejohn R S, Barnes D M, Millis R R, Rubens R D, Richards M A

机构信息

Imperial Cancer Research Fund Clinical Oncology Unit, Guy's Hospital, London, United Kingdom.

出版信息

J Clin Oncol. 1990 Dec;8(12):2040-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1990.8.12.2040.

DOI:10.1200/JCO.1990.8.12.2040
PMID:2230896
Abstract

Adjuvant systemic therapy for women with node-negative breast cancer is most easily justified for those patients at highest risk of relapse. We have examined the impact of tumor size, histologic grade, estrogen receptor (ER) status, tumor ploidy, and S-phase fraction (SPF) on relapse-free survival (RFS) for 169 patients with node-negative breast cancer in order to identify groups of patients at high and low risk of relapse. Patients with small tumors (less than or equal to 1.0 cm) had a significantly better RFS than those with larger tumors (P = .005), with 96% remaining relapse-free at 5 years. Patients with tumors less than or equal to 1.0 cm were thus excluded from analysis when attempting to define a group with a poor prognosis. Within the group of patients with tumors greater than 1.0 cm, tumor ploidy (P = .63), ER status (P = .3), or progesterone receptor (PgR) status (P = .24) did not predict for RFS. Patients with grade 1 or 2 infiltrating ductal tumors had a significantly better prognosis than those with grade 3 tumors (P = .04). The prognostic factor that gave the widest separation between subgroups, however, was SPF. Patients whose tumors were greater than 1.0 cm with an SPF less than or equal to 10% had a 5-year RFS of 78% compared with a 5-year RFS of 52% for those with an SPF greater than 10% (P = .006). We have combined tumor size and SPF to identify three prognostic groups: (1) tumor less than or equal to 1.0 cm, 5-year RFS 96%; (2) tumor greater than 1.0 cm plus SPF less than or equal to 10%, 5-year RFS 78%; 3) tumor greater than 1.0 cm plus SPF greater than 10%, 5-year RFS 52%. These prognostic groupings may help identify patients most suitable for adjuvant therapy.

摘要

对于复发风险最高的那些淋巴结阴性乳腺癌女性患者,辅助性全身治疗最具合理性。我们研究了肿瘤大小、组织学分级、雌激素受体(ER)状态、肿瘤倍体以及S期细胞分数(SPF)对169例淋巴结阴性乳腺癌患者无复发生存期(RFS)的影响,以便确定复发风险高和低的患者组。肿瘤较小(小于或等于1.0 cm)的患者RFS明显优于肿瘤较大的患者(P = 0.005),5年时96%的患者无复发。因此,在试图定义预后不良组时,将肿瘤小于或等于1.0 cm的患者排除在分析之外。在肿瘤大于1.0 cm的患者组中,肿瘤倍体(P = 0.63)、ER状态(P = 0.3)或孕激素受体(PgR)状态(P = 0.24)均不能预测RFS。1级或2级浸润性导管癌患者的预后明显优于3级肿瘤患者(P = 0.04)。然而,在各亚组之间区分度最大的预后因素是SPF。肿瘤大于1.0 cm且SPF小于或等于10%的患者5年RFS为78%,而SPF大于10%的患者5年RFS为52%(P = 0.006)。我们将肿瘤大小和SPF结合起来确定了三个预后组:(1)肿瘤小于或等于1.0 cm,5年RFS为96%;(2)肿瘤大于1.0 cm且SPF小于或等于10%,5年RFS为78%;(3)肿瘤大于1.0 cm且SPF大于10%,5年RFS为52%。这些预后分组可能有助于识别最适合辅助治疗的患者。

相似文献

1
Node-negative breast cancer: prognostic subgroups defined by tumor size and flow cytometry.淋巴结阴性乳腺癌:由肿瘤大小和流式细胞术定义的预后亚组。
J Clin Oncol. 1990 Dec;8(12):2040-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1990.8.12.2040.
2
Flow cytometric DNA ploidy defines patients with poor prognosis in node-negative breast cancer.流式细胞术DNA倍体可确定淋巴结阴性乳腺癌患者的预后不良。
Int J Cancer. 1994 Jan 2;56(1):16-25. doi: 10.1002/ijc.2910560105.
3
Prognostic value of DNA flow cytometry in the locally recurrent, conservatively treated breast cancer patient.DNA 流式细胞术在局部复发、接受保守治疗的乳腺癌患者中的预后价值。
J Clin Oncol. 1992 Dec;10(12):1839-47. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1992.10.12.1839.
4
S-phase fraction and nuclear size in long term prognosis of patients with breast cancer.乳腺癌患者长期预后中的S期分数与细胞核大小
Cancer. 1994 Oct 15;74(8):2287-99. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19941015)74:8<2287::aid-cncr2820740813>3.0.co;2-y.
5
Mutant p53 expression and DNA analysis in human breast cancer comparison with conventional clinicopathological parameters.人乳腺癌中突变型p53表达及DNA分析与传统临床病理参数的比较
Anticancer Res. 1995 Mar-Apr;15(2):581-6.
6
DNA flow cytometric analysis and prognosis of axillary lymph node-negative breast carcinoma.腋窝淋巴结阴性乳腺癌的DNA流式细胞术分析及预后
Cancer. 1992 Oct 1;70(7):1943-50. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19921001)70:7<1943::aid-cncr2820700722>3.0.co;2-y.
7
S-phase fraction and urokinase plasminogen activator are better markers for distant recurrences than Nottingham Prognostic Index and histologic grade in a prospective study of premenopausal lymph node-negative breast cancer.在一项针对绝经前淋巴结阴性乳腺癌的前瞻性研究中,S期分数和尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活剂比诺丁汉预后指数和组织学分级更能作为远处复发的标志物。
J Clin Oncol. 2001 Apr 1;19(7):2010-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2001.19.7.2010.
8
Sex steroid receptors, S-phase fraction and DNA ploidy as determinants of the risk of relapse and death of female breast cancer.性类固醇受体、S期分数和DNA倍性作为女性乳腺癌复发和死亡风险的决定因素。
Anticancer Res. 1992 May-Jun;12(3):677-82.
9
Prediction of relapse and survival in breast cancer patients by pS2 protein status.通过pS2蛋白状态预测乳腺癌患者的复发和生存情况。
Cancer Res. 1990 Jul 1;50(13):3832-7.
10
DNA ploidy and percent S-phase as prognostic factors in node-positive breast cancer: results from patients enrolled in two prospective randomized trials.
J Clin Oncol. 1993 Feb;11(2):351-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1993.11.2.351.

引用本文的文献

1
A Hybrid Computer-aided-diagnosis System for Prediction of Breast Cancer Recurrence (HPBCR) Using Optimized Ensemble Learning.一种使用优化集成学习的乳腺癌复发预测混合计算机辅助诊断系统(HPBCR)
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2016 Dec 6;15:75-85. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2016.11.004. eCollection 2017.
2
Detection of prognostic factors in metastatic breast cancer.转移性乳腺癌预后因素的检测
J Res Med Sci. 2013 Apr;18(4):283-90.
3
A simple and reproducible prognostic index in luminal ER-positive breast cancers.在腔面 ER 阳性乳腺癌中建立一种简单且可重现的预后指标。
Ann Oncol. 2013 Sep;24(9):2292-7. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdt183. Epub 2013 May 24.
4
Comparison between different cell kinetic variables in human breast cancer.人类乳腺癌不同细胞动力学变量之间的比较。
Cell Prolif. 2000 Apr;33(2):75-89. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2184.2000.00165.x.
5
Prognostic impact of proliferation-associated factors MIB1 (Ki-67) and S-phase in node-negative breast cancer.增殖相关因子MIB1(Ki-67)和S期对淋巴结阴性乳腺癌的预后影响
Br J Cancer. 1997;75(10):1525-33. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1997.261.
6
Tumor proliferative activity and response to first-line chemotherapy in advanced breast carcinoma.晚期乳腺癌的肿瘤增殖活性及对一线化疗的反应
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1996;38(3):289-97. doi: 10.1007/BF01806148.
7
S-phase fraction identifies high-risk subgroups among DNA-diploid breast cancers.S期分数可识别DNA二倍体乳腺癌中的高危亚组。
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1996;38(3):265-75. doi: 10.1007/BF01806145.
8
Differential expression of the topoisomerase II alpha and beta genes in human breast cancers.拓扑异构酶IIα和β基因在人类乳腺癌中的差异表达。
Br J Cancer. 1996 Jun;73(12):1518-24. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1996.286.
9
Prognostic factors for bone metastases in breast cancer.乳腺癌骨转移的预后因素
Int Orthop. 1993;17(1):60-3. doi: 10.1007/BF00195228.
10
Prognostic significance of flow cytometric DNA analysis and estrogen receptor content in breast carcinomas--a 10 year survival study.流式细胞术DNA分析及雌激素受体含量在乳腺癌中的预后意义——一项10年生存研究
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1992;24(2):115-26. doi: 10.1007/BF01961244.