Suppr超能文献

患者和医生哮喘恶化术语:来自 2009 年哮喘洞察和管理调查的结果。

Patient and physician asthma deterioration terminology: results from the 2009 Asthma Insight and Management survey.

机构信息

University of Tennessee Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee 38120, USA.

出版信息

Allergy Asthma Proc. 2012 Jan-Feb;33(1):47-53. doi: 10.2500/aap.2011.32.3520. Epub 2011 Dec 15.

Abstract

Long-term achievement of asthma control is dependent in part on the use of mutually understandable asthma terminology in all verbal and written patient-physician communications. Using data from the Asthma Insight and Management (AIM) survey, the objective of this analysis is to provide a contemporary depiction of asthma deterioration terminology as used by current asthma patients and physicians in the United States. As part of the 2009 AIM survey, current asthma patients (≥12 years of age; weighted n = 2499) and physicians (n = 309) were queried about their recognition, understanding, and/or use of the terms "asthma attack," "asthma flare-up," and "asthma exacerbation" in telephone interviews. Nearly all patients had heard the term "asthma attack" (97%), but relatively few had heard the term "asthma exacerbation" (24%); 71% had heard "asthma flare-up." In contrast, physicians reported using the term "asthma attack" least (65%) and the term "asthma exacerbation" most (77%) when discussing asthma with their patients; 70% reported using "asthma flare-up." Among patients familiar with "asthma flare-up" and "asthma exacerbation" (n = 502), only 38% said that the terms mean the same thing; nearly all physicians (94%) said that the terms mean the same thing. Collectively, data from the AIM survey suggest that patients and physicians use different asthma deterioration terminology and, more importantly, that they do not necessarily understand each other's terms. Standardizing asthma deterioration terminology may help optimize asthma patient-physician communication to improve patient understanding of written asthma action plans and therefore, enhance patient outcomes.

摘要

长期实现哮喘控制部分取决于在所有口头和书面医患交流中使用相互理解的哮喘术语。本分析使用来自哮喘洞察和管理(AIM)调查的数据,旨在提供当前美国哮喘患者和医生使用的哮喘恶化术语的现代描述。作为 2009 年 AIM 调查的一部分,当前哮喘患者(≥12 岁;加权 n = 2499)和医生(n = 309)在电话访谈中被询问他们对术语“哮喘发作”、“哮喘发作”和“哮喘加重”的认识、理解和/或使用情况。几乎所有患者都听说过“哮喘发作”(97%),但相对较少听说过“哮喘加重”(24%);71%听说过“哮喘发作”。相比之下,医生在与患者讨论哮喘时报告使用“哮喘发作”(65%)和“哮喘加重”(77%)这两个术语的频率最低;70%报告使用“哮喘发作”。在熟悉“哮喘发作”和“哮喘加重”的患者中(n = 502),只有 38%表示这两个术语的意思相同;几乎所有医生(94%)都表示这两个术语的意思相同。AIM 调查的数据表明,患者和医生使用不同的哮喘恶化术语,更重要的是,他们不一定理解对方的术语。使哮喘恶化术语标准化可能有助于优化哮喘患者与医生的沟通,以提高患者对书面哮喘行动计划的理解,从而提高患者的治疗效果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验