Department of Eating and Weight Disorders, Villa Garda Hospital, Garda (VR), Verona, Italy.
Int J Food Sci Nutr. 2012 Nov;63(7):796-801. doi: 10.3109/09637486.2012.658761. Epub 2012 Feb 7.
The aim of this study was to compare the estimations provided by three different means of measuring the resting energy expenditure (REE) in anorexia nervosa (AN) patients. REE was measured, after 24 h of refeeding, using a portable multisensor body monitor [SenseWear Pro2 Armband (SWA)], FitMate™ method and the Müller equation for individuals with body mass index < 18.5, the latter being based on dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry assessment of body composition. The mean differences between REE values estimated by SWA and those provided by the Müller equation and the FitMate™ method were significantly different from zero in both cases. In contrast, the mean differences between FitMate™ method and Müller equation were weakly significantly different from zero, and a significant correlation was noted between these two methods. In conclusion, the SWA does not appear to be an alternative to FitMate™ and Müller equation methods for assessing REE in AN patients.
本研究旨在比较三种不同方法测量神经性厌食症(AN)患者静息能量消耗(REE)的估算值。REE 使用便携式多传感器身体监测仪 [SenseWear Pro2 臂带(SWA)]、FitMate™ 方法和 Müller 方程进行测量,适用于 BMI<18.5 的个体,后者基于双能 X 射线吸收法评估身体成分。在这两种情况下,SWA 估算的 REE 值与 Müller 方程和 FitMate™ 方法提供的值之间的平均差异均显著不为零。相比之下,FitMate™ 方法和 Müller 方程之间的平均差异仅略有显著不为零,并且这两种方法之间存在显著相关性。综上所述,在评估 AN 患者的 REE 方面,SWA 似乎不能替代 FitMate™ 和 Müller 方程方法。