Vitaliano P P, DeWolfe D J, Maiuro R D, Russo J, Katon W
Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle 98195.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1990 Sep;59(3):582-92. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.59.3.582.
The goodness of fit among the appraised changeability of a stressor, coping, and depression in people with psychiatric, physical health, work, and family problems was examined (N = 746). It was expected that problem-focused coping (as opposed to emotion-focused coping) would be used more and be more adaptive in situations appraised as changeable as compared with situations appraised as not changeable. Although few relationships existed between appraisal and coping, tests of fit between coping and depressed mood (maladaption) were much stronger. In people with nonpsychiatric conditions, problem-focused coping and depressed mood were negatively related when a stressor was appraised as changeable but were unrelated when a stressor was appraised as not changeable. Emotion-focused coping was positively related to depression when a stressor was appraised as changeable. No general relations were observed in the people with psychiatric conditions.
对患有精神疾病、身体健康问题、工作问题和家庭问题的人群中应激源、应对方式和抑郁的评估变化性之间的拟合优度进行了检验(N = 746)。预计与被评估为不可改变的情况相比,在被评估为可改变的情况下,以问题为中心的应对方式(与以情绪为中心的应对方式相对)会被更多地使用且更具适应性。尽管评估与应对之间的关系较少,但应对方式与抑郁情绪(适应不良)之间的拟合度检验更强。在患有非精神疾病的人群中,当应激源被评估为可改变时,以问题为中心的应对方式与抑郁情绪呈负相关,而当应激源被评估为不可改变时则无关联。当应激源被评估为可改变时,以情绪为中心的应对方式与抑郁呈正相关。在患有精神疾病的人群中未观察到一般关系。